>net neutrality What's so bad about forcing normalfags

Can normie phoneposters deliver their take on this?

>>61339610
Net neutrality is more about not having ISPs lean on websites for money. Facebook and twatter will pay ISPs so that people who use those normie services will get full speed access.
But when it's time for the ISPs to lean on 4chan and say 'hey you should pay us money to get 'premium service content delivery'', you think hiroshima will pay the ransom? You think any small site can pay the ransom?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook_Zero
I know, right? What's so bad about normalfags freely browsing Facebook and Twitter while 4chan gets ratelimited to 1kbps?

>>61339969
That's targetted at developing markets where there is little specific service penetration due to bandwith costs. In the West facebook has mass penetration and no bandwith obsticles, people are already hooked on the service and depend on carriers, this example just doesn't apply.