Are differences between current atom CPUs even noticeable in real usage scenarios, to justify paying 100USD more for z8750 over z8550 or z8350?
Even few fps in the most indie of indie 2^3 bit games or faster loading of Chrome would give it an edge or ability to play Runescape that's 10 years old would be enough.
Not a goddamn bit.
>>61325125
You shouldn't even be looking at low end atom trash.
>>61325406
I can't afford anything better. I'm only 2 steps above pajeets and commies.
>>61325640
You looking at laptops? Just buy a secondhand laptop with an i5 or i3 in it for around about the same price you dumb poo.
http://ark.intel.com/products/93362/Intel-Atom-x7-Z8750-Processor-2M-Cache-up-to-2_56-GHz
Outdated, obsolete architecture
https://ark.intel.com/products/95592/Intel-Pentium-Processor-N4200-2M-Cache-up-to-2_5-GHz
Current Intel Atom architecture, but will be replaced by Gemini Lake soon
>>61325660
Convertibles to be exact.
>about the same price you dumb poo.
Maybe in USA, here in stores "secondhand" are priced exactly the same as new ones.
Half of the stuff is either used German and Russian hardware or unsold devices.
Atoms are half the IPC and half the clocks of desktop chips, literally useless even for facebook browsing
>>61325955
They can handle it as long as the OS (no naming names) isn't eating half of the system resources right off the top.
Unfortunately just trying to look at system resource usage in some OSes (not gonna say which) costs 5% CPU utilization itself.