AMD Radeon RX VEGA XTX, VEGA XT and VEGA XL

>>61323160
Fuck AMD and fuck drumpf

>>61323160
>285 watts
Not as bad as anticipated, but it better at least place between the 1080 and 1080 ti.

>>61323160

price is most important

>>61323160
>GTX 1055 equivalent
>GTX 1065 equivalent
>GTX 1075 equivalent

please do black and white color scheme to match my tachi mobo and r5 black case

>>61323283
They should sell motherboards with custom silk screenings desu

>>61323264
>hurr durr big die pascal is totally going to pwn everything

>>61323160
damn it looks good

File: MCY-005P-KWN00-NV.jpg (472KB, 1600x1600px) Image search: [Google]

472KB, 1600x1600px

does it fit in this case?

>>61323160
Neat

>>61323160
blunder of the century

How ironic is it that the XL is the cut down version? Who thought that was a good idea?

>>61326234
I want the pro suffix back.Don't they still use pro/xt on their codenames anyway?

>>61323421
It kinda will.
Pascal scales well with adding cuda cores.

>>61326789
Definitely won't be cheap, though.

That's a sexy looking card. NIce job AMD.

File: 1499313074831.jpg (168KB, 722x960px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 722x960px

HURRREEEEE

File: AMD-Radeon-RX-Vega-2-2.jpg (151KB, 1600x670px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1600x670px

>>61323160
https://videocardz.com/70895/amd-radeon-rx-vega-is-going-on-a-tour

ROAD TRIP. AMD is like "Catch RX Vega .. if you can."

>>61328164
It's a rectangle

>>61323160
>vega having more than 8gb
>implying it will even have enough power to push settings and resolutions that will force higher than 8gb

How come the AIO is pushing the same power usage as FE? It has half the amount of HBM2 so should be lower no?

>>61323230
Disagree. I want a 1080 Ti killer and am willing to pay $800-$1000 bucks for it. I just want a high-end gaming GPU without being forced into Nvidia's ecosystem.

>>61328772
>gotta race the miners

What's the rumours about the prices of vega gpus ?

>>61328863
eh. since vega die is pretty big, that means low yields by default. so their binning is probably pretty laxed to where as long as it functions, they're gonna use it. so they probably set a pretty high voltage standard.

they did something similar with polaris. but its in case, with its die size being small, yields where already pretty high. but to meet the target performance they wanted, and 14nm from global was pretty awful maturity wise, they allowed for some pretty high voltages to meet those frequencies.

which also means vega will most likely do pretty well with undervoting. as a good percentage of those chips will probably function great at lower voltage. as they're only testing at X voltage at the fabs. similar to polaris.

File: 1499647910124.png (173KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 600x602px

>>61328957
>newfags not knowing HBM is terrible at mining

>>61329572
People always say that but Fury and Fury X prices say differently.

>>61329572
Thats because you needed more than 4gb for mining.
It wasn't the HBM, but the total Vram available.

>>61329756
No, That’s because GDDR5X and HBM have a very high latency

>>61328790
Made of brushed aluminum looking material, with tasteful lighting accents that are understated. It's a nice upscale design.

>>61323160
how better will be temperature management for GPUs with AIO liquid cooling in general?

>>61329756
>>61329698
High latency
HBM2 is worse

>>61330671
a lot better than pure air cooling with that stock cooler

the air cooler on the hybrid card is only going to cool the power delivery stuff basically, seeing that the memory and the gpu will be using the water cooling loop

File: 32521.png (9KB, 213x237px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 213x237px

>>61323160
>AMD has to ship their cards with AIOs again

>>61330761
>Air cooled model available
>Reference card
>AiB partner cards coming later

Try harder, shill.

File: Toasty.jpg (41KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 300x250px

>>61330772
>Air cooled model available

File: 1361174205065.jpg (52KB, 400x330px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 400x330px

>>61323160
Even the cut down version is more intimidating than expected.
Will my 650W PSU survive?

>>61323160
I'm totally getting the XTX

File: 7999ceead3c47f872878ffc408b76410.jpg (121KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x800px

>>61331257
I'm getting the RX xXVEGAXx xlx xtx xx myself

>>61323160
I had 800xt, loved that card
good to see they are going back to those names.

So let me get this straight. The cut down vega draws more power than a 1080ti whilist being considerably less powerful? On a 14nm node compared to 16nm? Why is this allowed, mr. Raja?

>>61331672
1080ti draws 290w and peaks to 320+

>>61331681
Yeah nah you're a faggot, it has a TDP of 250W and I don't have a single reason to believe that Nvidia somehow lies about tdp more than AMD.

>>61331681
250 tdp
the 320+ cards are all aftermarket shit like the strix and FTW3 with stupid amounts of power phases and dual 8pin connectors with two bioses

File: 1499480567632.png (28KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 711x533px

>>61331693
>>61331722
Okay, it just peaks to 290w
still we are arguing 20w here, all depends on performance if it matters or not

>>61331901
So it draws 250w and peaks at 290w, quite the opposite of what you were asserting, more in line with the OFFICIAL TDP RATINGS like I was suggesting
Good to know

>>61331901
Abs peak is power limiters off
IE: Moving the power target above 100% on MSI afterburner

>>61328923
this

>>61323160
220W for cut down version? Didn't they advertise vega with 4x power efficient? Wtf, pajeet's lying again

Oh look
More amd housefires

>>61333971
isn't it comapred to fury x with same number of CUs?
fury x is what? 350w? not quite x4 but closer

>>61323160
>that font
Kill yourself phoner.