Post your SteamVR Performance Test results
>>61322962
No. VR is a retarded meme.
No. I don't even need it. I get nauseous when I even think of VR.
>>61323015
t. brainlet who can't handle more than 2 dimensions
>>61322962
Wont download 1+ gb to test, I just say no.
>FX 8120
I doubt it
>>61323153
It took me only 3 min to download & setup.
Do you not have fiber internet?
>1060
kek im using 1070 and its still not enough
>>61323231
he lives in the US
>>61323231
I have, ping is great but in a third world country the speed isn't.
Also, I know beforehand this pc isn't vr ready, why try?
>>61323086
t. Shill shilling faulty VR technology
>>61322962
is the varying quality a product of this test not being able to utilize all 6 cores or what? why is it dipping below very high?
>>61323211
>actually bought zambezi faildozer instead of Vishera Piledriver
>>61323375
The 1060 is way weaker than the 980 Ti
>>61323375
I think the dips are because of the GPU
the CPU was below 50C while running that
>>61323437
still, I bet my ass they made this demo on source engine, which keep in mind, is very dated and rather unoptimized for multithreaded workloads on recent hardware.
>>61322962
FX 8350
GTX 1070
so yeah it's ready, now HTC Vive for 450€ WHEN
Apparently not.
>>61324904
>7900 series not enough for low q VR
god save us all
Yes my PC is ready. I'm not though. No VR games really seem worth the hassle, and current games with VR slapped on all suck. Plus at the end of it, I'm still using a controller.
If we were talking full immersion with headgear, hand controls/controllers, games that can decipher non standard motions (everyone would reload the same gun a little differently), then maybe. VR might "be here and now" but not the level I think worthy of the buy in.
>>61323086
>who can't handle more than 2 dimensions
anon...