Leak :
https://videocardz.com/70874/intels-epyc-response-xeon-scalable-processor-skylake-sp
> NDA lifts tomorrow at 9:15 AM PDT
> Announcement
> Live launch event July 11th 2017 (Tuesday)
8:30 a.m PT / 11:30 a.m ET
Intel's answer to AMD's EPYC
One more salvo from AMD w.r.t Thread ripper and the landscape offerings will be complete.
>>61313167
>Brickland
>>61313167
Supposed benchmarks here : https://www.google.com/search?q=xeon+platinum+site:taobao.com
https://www.google.com/search?q=xeon+gold+site:taobao.com
>>61313167
>less cores
>less PCI express lanes
>less memory channels
>less cache
>higher power draw
>likely much more expensive
>"Mesh Interconnect" can't hope to compete with Infinity Fabric
>no TSME
Nah. Anyone who was looking at EPYC will still buy EPYC.
>>61313167
>1000W from a single chip
Intel causes global warming
>>61313754
I am moreso excited that the landscape of offerings will be complete. In short time, the hardware offerings from CPU/GPU/Memory manufacturers will be defined and state-of-the art and their upcoming road-maps defined. What comes after, is a very interesting age of computing.
We take all competitors seriously, and while AMD is trying to re-enter the server market segment, Intel continues to deliver 20-plus years of uninterrupted data center innovations while maintaining broad ecosystem investments. Our Xeon CPU architecture is proven and battle tested, delivering outstanding performance on a wide range of workloads and specifically designed to maximize data center performance, capabilities, reliability, and manageability. With our next-generation Xeon Scalable processors, we expect to continue offering the highest core and system performance versus AMD. AMD’s approach of stitching together 4 desktop die in a processor is expected to lead to inconsistent performance and other deployment complexities in the data center.
>>61313665
>This is what the 18 core X299 CPU will be based on
Sad!
BRICKLAND
I fucking lold
>>61315015
and this is the 2S highest end xeon they'll have
>>61316954
What's with all the cinnebench tests? Half the time CB fails to detect >64 threads, doesn't support process groups.
>>61316970
>Half the time CB fails to detect >64 threads
sauce?
>>61317007
its an intel thread mate nothing that makes them bad is acceptable
> the intel experience
>>61313167
>videocardz.com
>CPU
OK