Is google botnet?

yea

We've discussed this countless times, yes.
LURK MORE

>>61281355
>Is google botnet?
Do you even have to ask? Geez, aniki.

not fucking really. they could be but they're fairly responsible with data.

>>61281894
>they could be but they're fairly responsible with data.
How do you know that? Or do you just trust them to do what they say they'll do? Do you trust them for all time, that there's no possibility that they'll become untrustworthy in the future? Even if they're scrupulously honest, don't you think it's dangerous for one organization to have a complete picture of your life?

>>61281894
they sure are responsible with all that data they shouldn't be collecting in the first place so they can sell it and make money sign me the fuck up

File: C8_PoRjUIAAPoyc.jpg (112KB, 1076x1200px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 1076x1200px

Yeah but I would take Google fiber any day of the week

>>61281355
YOLO

>>61281894
Explain yourself

File: main-qimg-114244a6ca76ca74dbbe06e6ee1990cf-c.jpg (96KB, 572x712px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 572x712px

>>61281355
it is the most botnet of botnets, even worse than ms and fb

File: sad_pepe2.jpg (7KB, 250x241px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x241px

>>61281355
Is the pope catholic?

Gotta go fast. Very worth it, but the TV side is catching up to Time Warner in terms of shittiness. I think they're deliberately turning a blind eye.

They also just jacked up prices in everybody, but more if you weren't already signed up perviously.