Google Wifi Mesh system

>>61278407
Enjoy your botnet.

Just buy ubiquity stuff

Enjoy your botnet™.

>>61278407
Why would you want to buy a product from a company that's only profit margin is selling your info?

>>61278423

Yes of course. So whats the alternative? What other mesh network kits should I consider?

>>61278487
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss/140-5515588-8598345?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=mesh+network

Pick one that isn't made by google that is reviewed high.

ruckus zoneflex

>>61278487
Linksys if you want specs. TP Link if you're on a budget.

i use 3 aerohive ap250s at home, works pretty well

>>61278407
>>61278433

Buy a couple ubiquity acces points, setup unified AP. If all you want is a single wifi network spaning across the entire house-area then it's the best option.

"Mesh" is only usefull for people that can't run wires to each AP. If you can, it's a waste of money.

>>61278433
He seems to have the exact thing set up already.. 3 access points. That means the mesh shit is his issue. Client switching access points is up to the client

>>61278611

You odn'T get it, he does not have unified AP.

Mesh always comes with unified AP, unified AP can come without mesh. mesh is unnecesary i this case

>>61278572

My current access points are wired now. My understanding with the Google kit is that they will network over the wired and wifi, and present 1 AP but I'll roam between the different AP's as needed.

I already have tried naming my three access points the same name, but roaming doesn't work well. They just hang onto the current AP until they completely loose signal. I went back to different names so I can force/choose the ap's to force my roaming.

Will the Ubiquity stuff just reproduce what I'm doing now or can it do what the Google kit can do?

>>61278771
What.. All you have to do is put them on the same channel and same name.

>>61278407
IDK but have you tried turning the power of your APs down so they overlap less?