GPL is a cuck-license

Legally, they have to give the source code of all GPL software they ship. That includes modifications. So they are giving back.

>>61246958
It's like the GPL crowd think that Sony couldn't have made their own linux distro and added the same propietary code they added to their FreeBSD fork and made money and not given anything back to gpl software. I bet if Sony did they'd all brag about it, but because they chose BSD instead of GPL Linnux these socialist scumbags bitch about BSD being cucks

No. BSD is cuck-license. BSD = "corporations, get my work for free"

>>61247051
explain this
http://www.techrepublic.com/article/five-big-names-that-use-linux-on-the-desktop/

>>61247051
>Large companies can save a substantial amount of money by using open source software products
cuck

>>61246958
The moment they adapt the system for their hardware, they put money into it. They are required to give you the fruits of said money - the changes - back if you ever use their product.

>>61247140
As long as they don't sell or distribute the kernel patches only in binary, I'm fine with that. [2]

Corporation uses BSD-like licensed software
> cuck license
Corporation implementing their stuff
> thousands of people using their product
> critical vulnerability found because it's trash software
> thousands of people in danger
I think I like the first option more.

>>61246958
Damn you got so fucking butthurt about that other BSD thread you had to make another one?

>>61246958
>It's funny how you faggots call people that license their work under free BSD and MIT license for cucks
No we don't. We call proprietary software cuckware because the company is using "your" software like a bull uses your wife.

User is the cuck, not creator or software owner. Creator is the wife's dad in this analogy.

So how did Theo pay his bills for electricity in 2016? I hope Sony paid him a couple dollars for using OpenBSD.

>>61247037
They don't have to release the source code if they don't modify it. It's already released.
And they don't have to release modified code if they don't redistribute it.

>>61247601
>They don't have to release the source code if they don't modify it.
They must provide the source code (if asked), even if they do not modify it.

>>61247564
Sony uses FreeBSD and you can see OpenBSD donors online
http://www.openbsdfoundation.org/contributors.html

>>61247622
If Sony used GPL code for a game platform, they would have to release their code mods, and everybody would be using emulators.
Therefore they use the BSD cuck license.

>>61247515
If a company uses your GPL software to make money they are using your software like a bull uses your wife.

BSD you may clone my wife and add your own feature and claim the clone as your own and make clones of your clone which you sell for money

GPL you may use my wife and add to her, but not claim her as your own, she belongs to everybody for free with all the added stuff as well

>>61247617
Now your just making stuff up.

>>61247696
No. That's the basic idea behind GPL.

>>61247694
Every post you just get stupider.
It's only amusing to a point, though.

why are GPLtards like this

i don't get them

>>61247702
Have you even read the GPL?
Don't bother, I doubt you'd understand it.

>>61247564
They raised about 300-500.000 USD I think in 2016

>>61247694
>If a company uses your GPL software to make money
Nigga, lemmie just stop you right there. You're either completely retarded, underaged, or a bad troll. Possibly more than one.

>>61247728

$ cat gpl-3.0.txt | grep -v '^$' | wc -l
553

point taken, I don't want to blindly use license that I don't understand

File: 2017-07-06-162732_crop.png (18KB, 1377x170px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 1377x170px

Naw, we ain't deleting retarded posts today.

ITT people think GPLv3 doesn't exist

>>61247839
How can you see deleted posts?

>>61247874
Congrats on understanding 4chan as well as you do the GPL.

>>61247881
Enlighten me

>>61247895
No, it's far more entertaining to just let you shitpost about stuff you know nothing about. So, please continue.

>>61246958
Exactly. Stallman is a cuck.

>>61247909
Oh, you didn't refresh or something

>>61247920
Yeah, or something. Anyway, you were talking about cuck licenses?

>>61247945
No. It's just people call BSD people cucks, they aren't, they just like todo what they do and don't mind if others use their code and add their own code to distribute for free or to sell. Just as a GPL coderes aren't cuck if a company uses their software. Just turning it around showing the same insults can be used on themselves using the same logic. P.S. Not sharing how you got that is not very free/full disclosure. Got source code?

>>61248002
So, in other words, you listened to a bunch of know-nothing kiddos on /g/ and trolled yourself. You took jokes and "meemays" too seriously.

>>61247881
Are you the guys that hacked 4chan earlier?

>>61248163
Nah, I only hack Google, and then only when I need a backup copy of my data.

>>61246958
wow cool stuff bro

File: google-fuchsia-magenta-muh-bsd-sources.png (234KB, 1344x708px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1344x708px

tfw gpl has been reinforced in court and all people who redistribute must provide source and any additions upstream

bsd doesnt force these obligations

if you find a company who is infringing on the GPL please report them to the FSF

if you have personal interest in defending you can sue on behalf of the foundation or GNU itself

id suggest getting legal advice from the fsf since they have people who specifically understand the GPL and are versed in the court of law


>ps4
>magenta/fuschia
>macosx

seems like BSD are the true "cucks"