Why aren't you using a Core i9?

Are you retarded?

File: phi.jpg (32KB, 471x322px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 471x322px

>not having 72 cores

It's summer, I don't need a space heater.

File: 1471594155687.jpg (49KB, 312x585px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 312x585px

>>61218825
>72 Atom cores

poor

File: Anti-fag_2D.png (148KB, 8192x5174px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 8192x5174px

I don't do hardware DRM.

>>61218801
Why aren't you using a Pentium 4?

>purchasing a memelake-X processor
Anyone who buys this is surely on the low-functioning end of the spectrum.

Why aren't you using dual-xeons?

>using anything newer than core2
enjoy your literal botnet

>>61218801
Why aren't you using a Pentium 3?

>>61218918
Am I a server?

File: intel i9 exxxtreme edition.jpg (35KB, 400x276px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 400x276px

>>61218801

I am

>>61218801
i dont have a nuclear reactor

>>61218801
I have nothing to use it for.

>>61219130
>not using xeons for all tasks

lmao'ing @ your price for performance ratio

File: 51893.original-9806.jpg (38KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x300px

Still waiting for Core i11.

>>61219186
WHAT TASKS?
WHAT IS MY DESTINY?

it's illegal to build a nuclear power plant in your home

>>61219200
WHERE THE FUCK IS i4, i6, and i8
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Because I'm poor.

File: magik7.png (270KB, 600x336px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 600x336px

>>61218825
Why does it have a tumor

>>61219632
Omnipath.

>>61218801
I don't want jew jizz as TIM

>>61218801
My house already has central heat

>>61218801
How is their single core performance compared to 5Ghz i7 7700k?

File: housefire.jpg (225KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 1000x750px

>>61218801
But I do have an i9, anon.

Because I have Ryzen. But fuck Vega.

t. rx580 owner

>>61218801
Recently the asbestos has been removed from my house for the purposes of my own health

>>61218801
I think you meant to refer to the Intel® Core™ i9 X-series "Frylake-X" Processor.

>>61218801
I'm waiting for Threadripper™. I will go full retard if they release a 16cores part for $700.

>>61218801

i[not a prime number]

No thanks.

>>61219919
this desu

>>61219919
>year 3017
>AMD releases 2^50 quantum computer
>Intel releases ultragigganiggamemelake-X i3581, i3583 & i3593, STILL jizz inside

File: me.png (214KB, 405x402px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 405x402px

nigger im still on 2500k no need to upgrade for at least 8 more years

>>61218801
Because my custom water-cooling rig can't cool an i9.

>>61221820
>no need to upgrade for at least 8 more years
2600k fag here
Your 2500k is already showing its age
Will last 2-3 more years at best
Not having 8 threads is killing the 2500k

File: i9.jpg (434KB, 1906x1536px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 1906x1536px

>>61218801
I want to die, but burning to death seems like a horrible way to go.

Can someone please explain to me why the 18 core i9s actually have 19 cores, but the 19th core you can't use and can't deactivate.

i3 is better.

>>61221820
Have fun stuttering doing more than one task at the time faggot.

>>61222234
ummm 9>3

File: 0704171913-1.jpg (376KB, 1080x1668px) Image search: [Google]

376KB, 1080x1668px

>>61218859
Nice try there, anon!

>>61222223
Off by one.

The 19th core is probably faulty in most chips made.
So they just disable it.

>>61219566
>Marketing said not to use non-marketable digits.
fucking retarded isnt it?

>>61218853
So you're running a 386?

>>61222078
From what I've read the 10-core i9 runs cooler than the i7s since Intel is basically forced to bin them from the factory.

>>61218825
>72 cores of low frequency

Yeah sure, they might be good on servers for parallel processing, but I'm not running an imgur uploading node in my house.

>>61218801
Because it doesnt work on my ThinkPad W520 and I find my mobile quadcore sandybridge to be more than powerful enough

>>61218801
I like having a house to live in

thought about buying one (should be ok after delidding, like all intel's rubbish) but it looks like threadripper is going to suit my needs better

>>61218801
Not a fan of having my house burn down

File: a fucking fridge.jpg (407KB, 1920x1474px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1920x1474px

>>61222984
Horse shit of course, my dear shill.

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/intel-core-i9-7900x-skylake-x,5092-11.html

File: 140wmyass.png (26KB, 711x533px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 711x533px

>>61222078

File: ebin.png (2MB, 5098x1500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5098x1500px

I value my life.

>>61219048
this kid gets it

File: pepsi universe.png (141KB, 501x646px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 501x646px

>>61222911
>non-marketable digits.

what the hell does this even mean?

>>61218801
Waiting for winter so I can use it to heat my house.

File: 1497761641305.jpg (39KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 640x640px

>calls his CPU x86
>isn't using an intel 8086

File: 1467701884662.jpg (306KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1000x1000px

>>61218801
I don't have fire insurance

File: IntelOnRyzen2.png (485KB, 1016x2190px) Image search: [Google]

485KB, 1016x2190px

Because the i9 is a desperate attempt for Intel to play catch-up with AMD

>>61218801
Because I'm content with my Core2 Duo. Even if I did upgrade, it certainly wouldn't be to anything Intel.

>>61225101
>not calling it AMD64

File: nope.jpg (24KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 500x374px

>i9 over i7 broadwell-e

File: 1490787168578.png (76KB, 830x1000px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 830x1000px

>>61218801
The idea of having my own personal blast furnace does sound rather appealing.

File: the cat is pissed off at you.jpg (152KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 750x1334px

>>61218801

Here's your you (You)...

cus it expensive, i dont need it, and i wont replace my MOBO, RAM, PSU, AND CPU just to please you, YOU MOTHER FUCKER.

>>61226251
>Broadwell-E over the based 5820k
I wouldn't buy it today, but at the time, I thought it was THE CPU to buy.

>>61218801
Because my workloads don't really involve anything needing lots of cores? Don't need it, so I am not going to pay for it.

Funny thing, I am pretty sure I said this exact statement in a carbon copy of this thread, except it was about thread ripper.

And the identical one about Epyc.

Are there templates for these shitty threads that you cucks just bring up and input the meme product of the week? It's always the exact same shit, but with a new meme.

It would be not that bad if I use it at under 3GHz like Xeon. It's still overpriced for a CPU with no ECC, so I wouldn't touch it anyways.

>>61222078
>Intel
>Radeon hat
>Old Radeon logo
What

>>61227348
Someone is yet to make a Ryzen/nu-Radeon wojak edit.

No iGPU.

>>61227552
Why the fuck would you want an iGPU?

>>61218801
Because my 1st gen i3 does everything I want it to do.

>>61227561
For not playing games

>>61218801
The i7-7820X is almost as fast and it's much cheaper. Even cheaper than Ryzen 7 1800X if you consider everything.

File: 1499208006009.jpg (433KB, 1906x1536px) Image search: [Google]

433KB, 1906x1536px

>>61227518
>>61227348
>>61222078

I fixed it. I'll make a Threadripper one when that comes out.

>>61219817
$849 iirc

>>61218845
> being on /g/
> not hyping the AMD muh 9999 cores strategy

GAAAAY
Everyone knows here that muh cores and threads is da future!

File: xPP0lZE.jpg (127KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1024x1024px

>>61218801

I don't live in a fridge and my delidding bench hasn't arrived yet.
>>61219095
he is, the last time intel updated their arch was netburst and they backpedaled hard on that one

>>61218801
LN2 is too expensive to use 24/7

>>61223966
thatsthejoke.jpg

>>61218801
>upgrading cpu just cause there's a newer one
call me when it's at least twice faster than a 6th gen i5 per core

>>61218801
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
Because the 7740k has better single thread performance.

>>61230277
pretty crazy that they're all in the same ballpark

you have to go back to like Core2 Duo to see a big difference with modern cpu performance

this explains a lot about the software industry and why a GPU maker has returned to the market

>https://www.extremetech.com/computing/251882-overclocker-claims-x299-vrm-temperatures-disaster-limit-skylake-x-potential

Just when you thought it was safe after the 7700k fiasco...

File: 1454395771212.jpg (26KB, 478x483px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 478x483px

>>61230481
>mfw X299 is a legit, not even fucking kidding fire hazard if you OC it

File: animefacepalm006.jpg (30KB, 632x357px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 632x357px

>>61230537
>mfw Intel probably will come back with the fact that X299 wasn't meant to be OC like they did the 7700k

File: 30035734923l.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>61230579
lul, good luck with that.

One question, but why do they insist on separating Turbo Boost 2.0 and 3.0? Is there some platform limitation with 3.0? Why not just advertise the faster 3.0 speeds if it works with everything?

Because I have a 6700k

>>61230647
Artificial market seperation is Intel's bread and butter ..

>>61230596
>peace of mind
>performance tuning protection plan
????
K series getting a limited warranty?

Because I'm not a retarded overclocking gamer kiddo. I just bought a 6 core Xeon and I'm done.

Ryzen seems tempting but I don't fully trust the platform yet and that iX gamer shit just seems like a money grabbing scheme.

>>61231152
You can buy one. https://click.intel.com/tuningplan/

>>61231368
>6c xeon
You better bought it used or have a very specific use, or you just jewelry yourself really hard

>>61218832
Winter is coming™

>>61231595
Yes, but is there going to be dragons or just more dick?

File: 1493289111329.gif (818KB, 268x274px) Image search: [Google]

818KB, 268x274px

>>61224174
WTF is Intel thinking?

>>61218801
Because my i7 920 running at 4.4GHz from 2008 is still fine.

>>61231618
Dragon...dicks

>>61231579
>or you just jewelry yourself really hard
it was $230 https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117627

File: 1310496497472.jpg (15KB, 203x152px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 203x152px

>3
>5
>7
>9
>none of them have 3 5 7 or 9 cores

>>61224174
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkyhvCdJ_vM

>>61226046
Kek, that is one desperate attempt to sway stores. If an employee came up to me and tried to shill Intel, I'd tell that person thanks for finally convincing me to use Amazon instead.

I buy blue and red, but if Intel really wrote that shit, I wouldn't be surprised. Businesses hate competition

>>61231667
>1.7GHz
kek you made a killer deal there pal

File: IMG_1630.jpg (193KB, 605x453px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 605x453px

>>61230596
>upgrade option
>protection plan
>Intel selling insurance as processor DLC

File: intel persuasion kit.jpg (460KB, 2083x1405px) Image search: [Google]

460KB, 2083x1405px

>>61231778
lol.

>>61231822
It's not like most people even have warranty anyway because most people here overclock their CPU.

>>61231854

It's not even that. The main problem is the amount of voiding the warranty due to needing better temps and delidding the processor due to Intel's gunk.

>>61231834
>doesn't want free coffee

>>61231667
>1.7GHz

What the fuck are you planning on doing with it?

>>61222984

But didnt the i9s get made as an afterthought in a poor attempt to counter thread ripper?

>>61231638
They were NOT thinking while releasing this.

File: 1494820372401.jpg (51KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 540x960px

>>61231638
I know, right?

inb4 retards say "more amprage = more powerful processing"

same people who say more ram usage in chromium equates to better performance (NOT PER MEMORY).

and then call you a poorfag for not buying into the 16GB meme instead of demanding better software

File: IMG_1634.jpg (53KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 600x451px

>>61231834
Free coffee is dank but I wouldn't shill. I'd sell the bare minimum to the Intel guys and red to all the new PC builders.

Also >not drinking microbrew coffee and supporting veterans by means of pic related

>>61218801
cause I don't need nothing above i3
and i'm not a basement dwelling kiddo-faggot

>>61228396
EPYC 16core parts has them starting at way lower and it's fours dies on one package. Maybe the highest end TR will be around that price or $1000 altogether.

>>61221820

Any reason why you don't OC that? You should get to 4.3/4.4GHz by sneezing in the BIOS menu.

>>61229881
I want to lick it

>>61234004
lol this. no way hes getting decent fps at that clockspeed.

Because m gonna buy a Ryzen 1700 and a gtx 1060.

>>61221820
Good luck, overclock it at least to 4.0GHz, your cpu will last 2 more years.

God damn this thing runs hot. I don't like maintaining water cooling so I have about 400 dollars of fans in my case. Everything runs chilly cool, no VRM overheat issues (peaks 73C on 240W), the temp inside the case is 27C...

...but the CPU package rides all the way up to 100C and starts throttling slightly (3.9~4 GHz instead of 4). The actual heatsink is comfortable to touch but the CPU reaches ridiculous temperatures. This would be even worse on an AIO because on air I'm also cooling down all the components near the CPU. Stock settings, no OC, no AVX offset. God damn.

>>61226524
>Here's your you...
Nicola and Bart
Rest forever here in our hearts ...

>>61234056
Single mom upbringing?

This is a ylyl thread so far.

>>61236501
Everything about X299 is ylyl.

>>61219919
but 9 is a prime number you dumb moron.

>>61235744
>tfw I wanted to buy le powerful processor
>read this

File: it's me it's me.gif (2MB, 350x263px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 350x263px

>>61235744
>every review says it's a housefire even at stock
>buy it anyway
>Wow, this thing runs hot! I can't believe it!

Over priced crap

>>61236815
The funny thing is it actually does perform well at stock, similarly to a stock 7700K for most purposes and smashing apart a R7 1800X even when thermal-throttled when doing multicore workloads. I couldn't get it to throttle unless I ran P95 AVX with small FFT; other benchmarks were closer to 80C.

>>61230277
WTF? Why is the ryzen 5 1400 so low? Did I make a bad decision? Pls respond I am depressed now

>>61234187
>3.7 GHz
>not getting decent FPS
nigga what u smokin

maybe the latest AAA game at 260Hz in 4k

but 99% of games are GPU limited not CPU limited. 2500k is still fine for gaymes

1: Can't afford it
2: Even if I could afford it I would get a Threadripper CPU

>>61237520
That's objectively untrue. Once you get past 45-60 FPS most games are no longer fully GPU bottleneked and get measurable performance increases by improving the CPU. This is especially true for minimum frame rates.

>>61236708
what is 3x3

>>61237481
All of the Ryzen CPUs are slower in terms of single core compared to Skylake/Kabylake K-series i3/i5/i7. However passmark is generally trash so don't take anything there seriously.

>>61237481
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-1400-vs-Intel-Core-i5-7400/3922vs3886

This is a better comparison with R5 1400 vs a similarly priced i5.

>>61237613
At least r5 is unlocked and the OC reduces that gap in performance a lot

>>61230277
>https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
>A12-9800 PRO has a better single-threaded score than a Ryzen 5 1500X
>a fucking Excavator is better than Zen in ST IPC
Gee, it's almost as if that benchmark is severely flawed in some way

>>61232083
For browsers that's true, cache more things = faster loading times

>>61237584
Cinebench St scores with normalized frequency shows almost same perf.
Intel has way more frequency.

The new cache structure is fucked 7900x is worse than 6950 and reaching haswell e and ryzen levels even with higher ock

Games
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/964-20/jeux-3d-battlefield-1-the-witcher-3.html

Clock per clock 7900 is 12% worse than bwe and on par with ryzen


http://www.hardware.fr/articles/964-6/piledriver-zen-broadwell-e-skylake-x-3-ghz.html

File: cinebrunch 1.png (344KB, 847x917px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 847x917px

>>61238020
I loves me some cinebrunch.

>>61218801
Ryzen 8core is more efficient, can run air cooled and you can probably save $150 on motherboard (and $100 on that cooling).

Not willing to pay the steep rise in price and power consumption/heat for the modest bit of extra performance.

>>61238163
Its still accounting frequency, so its not an IPC graph. SLX is probably getting advantage in Multithread due to the greater frequency, but that is all it takes, the bigger L2 is just a mark of a rebadged xeon architecture that will mostly benefit only enterprise apps like databases.

>>61237246
It's like they accidently set the all core turbo to a strict 4ghz and let the chips fly with that. tt's won their performance benchmarks but for what, these are competing against the coming breadtrippers and will win in gaming and photoshop really.

If they had more resonable turbo states (4.5ghz on one core is probably fine) they could probbaly maintain top performance accross most things without this housefire debacle.

>>61238483
TR probably will not win in gaming unless the 2:1 ratio on infiniyty fabric means anything.

Frequency alone SKX still tops TR, but how much?

>>61218801
>Why aren't you using a Core i9?
Don't want to get engulfed in flames during my sleep.

>>61218801
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89Tgazt8v5Y

De8auber updated the video;
Some people are not reaching overtemperatures on vrm because the BIOS actually limit current

If you remove the current cap performance scales but also throttle

If you stick with "intel approved current limit" games and benchmarks are poor

>>61239368
Jesus christ. The ride never ends. And we're not even seeing the mess the 12-18 core models are going to create yet. Except X299v2 lol.

>>61219200
>i read this as Core 9/11
Damn'it

>>61239707
Intel CPUs can melt steel beams.

>>61230596
>"It's only meant for overclocking if you delid it and use liquid nitrogen to cool it! Stop overclocking with plebeian air or water cooling!"

>>61231638
That's the thing, anon. They aren't.

>>61218801
Because socket 2066 and Skylake-E are literal hot garbage.

It's easily Intel's worst desktop product in a decade of lackluster releases.

>>61231152
>>61231152

I killed a 3970X by overclocking and got it replaced without that protection plan (which was new at the time).

File: 1499314732725.png (148KB, 1233x688px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 1233x688px

>>61224174
>>61231638

File: please upgrade to windows 10.jpg (11KB, 210x179px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 210x179px

>hardware drm

>>61218801
I was considering it, because the extra cores would actually help with my work pipeline. But $1k is a bit steep and on top of that I'd have to replace almost everything in my rig to accommodate it. I'll probably go with the Ryzen tbqh.

>>61242102
get threadripper when it comes out, 16 cores for the price of intel's 10 core, performance is equivalent to two 1800X slapped together

>>61242128
I'm still amazed at how Epyc and Threadripper scale their cores so well compared to Intel.

>>61242147
It boils down to the way AMD designed it, intel is using basically the same stuff for a long time now, only with minor tweaks

>>61242128
yeah, I'll keep an eye on it

>>61242102
1700 is a great deal desu, you can't go wrong with that. If you want even more cores, then by all means wait for TR. You might see 16 cores for $650-$750 if the Epyc slides are of indication.

>>61234004
havent had a need to overclock it yet

>>61234187
>no way hes getting decent fps at that clockspeed
im not a gaymen, >>>/v/

>>61224762
Ask marketing

>>61218808
Must be

File: ocean_pizza.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

I'm looking at the i9-7900x and 16-core Threadripper for building a new workstation.

TR will almost certainly be a better value but I'm a little concerned about single threaded performance compared to the i9. Also the x399 mobos seem a tad half-assed compared to x299 (see Asus Zenith Extreme vs Rampage VI Extreme for example) but that's probably just superficial for the most part.

>>61242672
just get the 6950X and overclock it if you're worried about single threaded performance, the 7900X is basically the same thing but it gets way hotter

Low availability. Errata (there's a reason AVX-512 has been so many years coming). Virtually mandatory delidding for a high-watt, fairly large $1000 CPU they couldn't be bothered to spend another $50 of indium and gold on when AMD does it across their entire line just fine. Chipset clusterfucks due to surprised partners. RAID DRM. Threadripper is faster, cooler, and cheaper.

It's a perfect example of why Intel needs competition from AMD.

>>61242672
>Also the x399 mobos seem a tad half-assed compared to x299
Which is funny because the x299 boards are incredibly half-assed. No TB and awwful VRM heatsinks for a start.

>>61241903
>500W draw
W H A T
H
A
T

>>61225262
Get on that shit anon, would've lost everything instead of getting a brand new home a couple years back.

>>61243683
>Prime95

Who here really takes Prime95 seriously? Because I never did. OCCT maybe (which also is like Furmark).

>>61244270
Prime95 has been a stress testing staple for years. How convinent that it suddenly becomes worthless as soon as Intel platforms melt into slag when they use it.

>>61232508
epyc has 4 dies either cut down or are fucked to make that 16 core part, meanwhile threadripper for 16 will need two fully functional dies, with binning could cost up to 1000$

>>61244270
Yeah, who takes utilizing the CPU fully seriously! Nobody should need more than 60% utilization anyway!

>>61218801
I don't want to

Real question: would you take a bullet for your favorite computer hardware corporation?

>>61237802
Or the more likely story... we have been lied to all along about what is good and this one particular website has the truth!

>>61244270
>>61244689
>stress test doesn't matter
>power consumption doesn't matter
>temperature doesn't matter
>overclocking doesn't matter
things really changed aren't they

>>61244751
Do I get something out of it? Like a lifetime supply of their newest products.

File: 1466635978292 amd lisa su ceo.jpg (7KB, 125x132px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 125x132px

>>61244751
I would take a bullet for mommy.

>>61245192
No