Piracy exposes children to harm

>>61218139
>Porn
>Harm
Pick one.

>>61218139
The corporate megaculture exposes children to a hell of a lot more harm than piracy ever could

>>61218187
Children are traumatized and never have healthy sexual lives if exposed to such content when they are too young for understanding it.

Basically all pedos, rapists, nymphomaniac women etc. were abused or exposed to pornography when they were kids themselves.

If you have a child and let them browse anything online besides Youtube Kids, you deserve to be punished for putting them in a risky situation.

>>61218139
>Piracy exposes children to harm
Well clearly.
No one is safe in the middle of a boarding for the intent to rob and cause criminal violence. It stands to reason.

>>61218215
Look at this fagola

There is a ton of research that say's you're a gigantic liar.

File: image?c=03AEHxwuzSfpXJIkUB-zEOpGGqwbvOH0Igkb10nIJ_z-q52Ctitq6PpyEvCNcE8PB2x9ahLN0gpfL4hs75epE4KFf2ijvMWSeejLZ-A2wHA8IFO31T4xZGznMIOhDolTF0GE_AMsH-znddYJLQdzdAnzU-HfFFmWsv-r0I-J8Sz-SHXSqBtlV7_etqWobmQBvKE8rQ_MNGjhOYiprZgF6tXO4w0HizI9b-Ig&th=,XK1XrYywo6.jpg (4KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 300x57px

The whole article reads like a fucking advertisement. Nice >journalism you have there in shitain.

>>61218305
Keep justifying your addiction

>Piracy exposes children to harm
>actually it's just this one program normalfags love which somehow has fucking advertisements for alcohol and gambling before you can watch your pirated content lmao
WHAT?

this is why i download, not stream

File: 1495076632726.png (163KB, 351x307px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 351x307px

>>61218378
>he doesnt jerk off 6 times a day

File: 1499191245252.jpg (117KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1280x720px

>>61218215
(((youtube kids)))

File: 1459485173366.png (3KB, 310x253px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 310x253px

>>61218139
>Noooo. If Timmy sees breasts he might develop a healthy sexuality towards females instead of chopping his dick off and crossdressing.

>>61218215
I'd rather expose my kids to porn rather than carefully-crafted corporate advertising messages.

>>61218139
Anon who grew up pirating software reporting in!
Its rubbish!
Its the new piratebay/limeware tabloid scaremongering!

>>61218139
>Parents don't want to do their job and want the state to step in
Good thing natural disasters weed them out

>>61218139
Maybe if people didn't buy shitty streaming boxes this wouldn't happen. I wish streaming fags would stop abusing kodi. It works so well for a personal library of dvd rips.

>>61218215
>Basically all bla bla bla

people that were abused as children have a slightly elevated risk of going on to become abusers themselves although there are other factors at play, however that is not to say that everyone that was abused becomes an abuser nor that everyone that is an abuser has to had have been abused

basically, quit trying to normalise abuse as 'well they were abused as children so of course they did those things', not only does it severely ostracise an already vulnerable and marginalised group of people that suffered childhood abuse it may also put vulnerable children at risk because 'of COURSE it's safe to leave timmy with our neighbour because they had a perfectly normal and happy upbringing'; outwardly good people that had normal happy childhoods aren't immune from developing severe mental issues nor are they immune from doing evil things

as far as the rest of your points goes I somewhat agree, although the common sense/in moderation approach always works, young children shouldn't be exposed to sexual content however once they're approaching puberty or are going through puberty they're probably a lot more mature and self aware than people give them credit for - a completely puritan no sex ed approach will do far more harm than it will good