Functional programming goes here.
Do you have cute Poojeet girl teaching you FP?
>>61218111
>>61218135
She is so cute<3
Haskell, and by extension all FP languages are memes and offer no benefits to imperitive programming
But oop is OBJECTivly better ;->
>>61218147
>>61218192
>>61218514
This level of autism shouldn't be possible.
>>61218514
Go back to /v/ you fucking retard. I hope that you're doing it for the (You)s because that has to be the most retarded thing I read all day
>>61218619
>Hurr durr I don't even code
Shut up bitch, I bet you're a vurgin dumb fuck
I've been programming OOP for like 3 years in Python and Java and you don't know shit
>>61218514
Fuck you, i like fp so oop is shit
>>61218659
Same, everything is in the details. They like FP, but they never used it in any real project.
>>61218111
Imagine how much her flurry must stink of curry
>>61218659
You can do OOP in functional languages you retard
>Learning to do X in Javascript that it was never meant to do
STOP
STOP TRYING TO DO EVERYTHING IN THAT AWFUL LANGUAGE
>>61218856
I was baiting
>>61218864
>daily reminder that JavaScript was made in a day
>>61218897
>To defend the idea of JavaScript against competing proposals, the company needed a prototype. Eich wrote one in 10 days, in May 1995.
Fucking hell you weren't lying
>>61218948
>that one day was for planning too
Lambdas are inferior classes. Closures are inferior objects. Functional programming is a meme that should have died with Lisp machines.
>>61219076
>lambdas are classes
>closures are objects
jump off an overpass
>>61220067
If you don't understand the equivalency, then you either don't understand OOP or you don't understand FP.
>>61220160
Closures maybe, but it's a stretch.
Lambdas have nothing to do with classes and nothing in common with them though.