Microsoft, please...

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-04 13-15-25.png (1MB, 3200x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3200x1800px

>>61214525
>software increases your dpi

>>61214525
>pixeled vs blurried

File: Screenshot (124).png (24KB, 926x160px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 926x160px

shit, i forgot to rasterize the mactype layer before resizing

>>61214551

Is there any fucking single way of having font rendering on Linux that doesn't look like absolute shit? Look at the fucking tab header. In 'Tokyo' the 'T' is like 3 inches away from the rest of the god damn word.

Why can't freetards do anything properly? Why can't you just literally copy something from Windows or better yet Apple's newer custom San Fran font?

HOW HARD IS IT TO CLONE A FUCKING FONT

>>61214525
i dont get what the point of this picture is.
what im seeing from it is that windows font rendering is better, which is the opposite of the point youre trying to make.

from your picture, windows:
sharper, blacker, and more legible
& has support for ligatures (fi, tt)

fuck your blurry text meme

>>61214689
linuxes fontrendering ( freetype2 ) is good, it's the freeturd fonts that suck ass, using applel's and ms fonts in linux fixes it
but it's illegal, and in case of applel you aren't even allowed to post screenshots if you use applel fonts outside of applel OS

>>61214689
that has nothing to do with font rendering you fucking mong

>>61214691
it was a mistake on my part when processing the right side.
can you still say the same about this >>61214663

>>61214711
Google has some good libre fonts available

>>61214727
>>61214663
disgusting.
i would rather use terminus everywhere than deal with this blurry shit.
>>61214711
how was i able to install apple fonts from AUR then?

File: dzntmttr.png (86KB, 2027x1020px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 2027x1020px

>>61214525
its a non-issue if you're monitor's gud

>>61214711

You aren't allowed to run macOS on non-Apple hardware either, doesn't mean they've ever gone after anyone. They honestly don't care, they see it as a gateway into eventually buying a Mac, besides, Hackintosh is way too small for them to care about. They've never even went after all the websites and such that cater to the community like Tonymacx86. I doubt Apple has a division set up for scouring the web for someone posting 6 images a year of what appears to be their font in a Linux screenshot on some forum.

>>61214749
because nothing stops random dickhead users from uploading something illegal into user repository?

>>61214763
yea, but that's fucking obvious
at high enough dpi you just don't care about antialiasing, filtering, hinting and whatnot
but the future isn't here yet
4k is still an expensive meme

File: works on my machine retards.png (25KB, 913x634px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 913x634px

all good here

>>61214784
>$300
>expensive
Just because you cant buy it with ebt doesnt mean its a meme

File: Screenshot (125).png (84KB, 1648x1018px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1648x1018px

>>61214799
looks like shit

>>61214849
mac-type is the biggest meme dude

get out of here with your ugly blurry shit

>>61214980
but >>61214849 actually looks better than >>61214799 shit
honestly though, all you need is a bolder font, not different font rendering.

>>61215107
Not him but how do you bolden the font?

>>61214799
looks like shit

>>61214849
looks even worse, what's the point of using dpi scaling?

>>61215582
so i can sit further away from my monitor
i also have more than one and they are all of different sizes and resolutions

File: Screen Shot 2017-07-04 at 15.19.33.png (75KB, 783x747px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 783x747px

Mactype breaks a decent chunk of Windows apps, having shit fonts is just one of the many perks associated with being a Wincuck

>>61215981
windows dpi scaling is bad

File: 1464191967071.jpg (10KB, 237x192px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 237x192px

>people sperging out about fonts
>wow yours looks great!
>wow yours looks shit!
>change my own font settings
>it all looks the same to me

File: macfags.png (63KB, 955x838px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 955x838px

>>61216604
how so?
>>61216015

>>61217406
>how so?
It doesn't work, at all.
It's hilariously bad if you're using multiple screen resolutions and just awful otherwise.

>>61214615

/thread

>>61217448
wtf are you talking about
im using multiple monitors with various resolutions and it works just fine

>>61217487
Are you running at 100% scaling?
Change that number and tell me it works just fine.

>>61214525
Microsoft just can't into good typography. Fonts on Windows always look like pajeet-tier shit.

>>61217406
fails so bad at small text size. look at this one >>61216015 ... see the top font drop down menu? that text is 9pt. yet it's perfect.

>>61217535
one is 150%, the other is 125%

both work just fine

what is the problem you are talking about?

File: Untitled-2.png (24KB, 1095x675px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 1095x675px

>>61217573
macfags so gay they got lgbt flag in their fonts

>>61217610
bottom one looks like shit.

>>61214525
blur my shit up, senpai?
windows fonts are good, they're clear and easy to look at, every time i try to read something on macos I keep scratching my eyes thinking that my eyes got bad but it's just them blurry fonts

This is how it used to be:
https://www.thurrott.com/windows/windows-10/83964/microsoft-may-never-fix-high-dpi-issues-windows-10

I use OS X as my daily driver now but running two separate resolutions used to give you some seriously sketchy scaling, one 4K monitor another 1080 was just horrendous as it would default to 4K DPI for both monitors.

>>61217664
kek, upper is cleartype

>>61217672
sauce?

>>61217688
no it's the 600% crop of >>61216015

>>61217711
then mac has their own implementation of cleartype

>>61217723
no they dont, what you're seeing is called subpixel rendering, it's used universally nowadays but apple was the first to implement it.