INTEL A KILL

This is based on how many CPU benchmarks are being done by one app.

Intel shills will use this argument to discredit it, while ignoring the fact that it accurately paints all the past marked shares extremely accurately.

Wtf I love AyyMD now

>>61178406
>fake chart

Intel grew complacent, now it's time to pay

File: intel.jpg (986KB, 2208x1552px) Image search: [Google]

986KB, 2208x1552px

>>61178553
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/market_share.html

OY VEY

Neato!

>>61178681
>its real

OOOOOOOYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

>>61178406
Holy shit. Zen2/Zen+ is going to murder Intel.
SHUT IT DOWN

>>61178406
>>61178681
>10 years of (((progress))) lost
DELET

>>61178406
>Iintel still on top

ALl is right with the world

File: dsfdsf.png (60KB, 739x583px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 739x583px

>>61178864
>they actually have

If AMD reaches 50/50 with Intel they'll have so much money they won't know what to do with it, Nvidia's revenue and profits will look like jokes in comparisons.

Also reminder that Intel posts over 7 times higher net profit per quarter than Nvidia, and only has 50% market value

>>61178936
AMD Is a very neat and pro-consumer company. They'll use the money to develop new technologies and have even better cards for even an even cheaper price.

>>61178964
lmao

>>61178935
They'll cross over in 3rd Q 2018 and AMD will hit 65% marketshare in 2nd Q 2019

t. futureguy from the future :^)

File: europ.jpg (26KB, 664x392px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 664x392px

This is the state in Europe at the moment.

if AMD and Intel are selling 50/50, how long would it take for AMD to reach 50%?

>>61179007
>amd supports coreboot
>jewtel add rfid chips to a cpu

>>61179071

the fuck is this scale? week of the current year?

>>61179071
>in europe
Irrelevant, they'll impose fines onto AMD the second they reach 51% because the EU doesnt understand free market capitalism.
There's a reason it takes all 20+ countries of the EU to match the GDP of the US.

>>61179085
5/29 to 7/1

http://imgur.com/a/qbGhk

Fun fact! Intel funds Feminist Frequency!
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/10/intel-cuts-300m-in-jobs-research-education-and-talent-to-fund-feminist-frequency/

File: 71b06bfd0c08c66f8cba5012fde76a60.png (31KB, 404x255px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 404x255px

So Intel is flopping around right now, sure, the 7700k and their Pentium is the only thing worth buying. 7700k only for high refresh machines. Epyc is on their ass in the business side of the market.
However 10nm is coming, and it's going to be insane if you ask me. It will be the most advanced silicon process on the planet.
But if we look at AMD they have their AM4 socket that they have committed to(big deal), mobile parts coming, etc. Gloflo is about to get their new process going next year which will bring Zen up to 5ghz instead of 4.
In addition AMD claimed that the next iteration of Zen will have 10% IPC improvement before they even launched Zen. I believe this is because there is low hanging fruit in the arch that they just didn't have time to finish optimizing.
Take a 10% IPC increase, add a 25% frequency increase, keeping in mind Zen/IF's ridiculous scaling and cheap cost to make, and you have a chip that will immediately invalidate every other desktop chip on the market.
How will this compare to Intel's 10nm? Will Intel be held back by their bingbus design vs the CCX's of Zen?
The hardware news is going to be so damn interesting over the next few years. We've had a decade of boring ass shit but FINALLY they're doing THINGS!

>>61179134
Based AMD

kaby lake was a mistake

>>61179077
>amd supports coreboot
Not true after PSP.

>>61179134
Now pasta about Wega

>>61179134
I graduate from college in winter 2018. Will be a good time to upgrade.

>>61178681
fake news

>>61179217
Yeah, if they dropped psp or open sourced it, AMD would gain even more traction still, even if they cards werent quite as good otherwise

>>61180616
>or open sourced it
they're still figuring out how to open source it without exposing their botnet

>>61180616
If AMD dropped PSP they would also find it harder to do business in a lot of countries. Governments really love backdoors anon.

I love amd

File: c46bb75726c9468ab9e8953343846d0b.jpg (50KB, 619x406px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 619x406px

>>61178406
reminds me of this

>>61178681
>This graph counts the baselines submitted to us during these time period and therefore is representative of CPUs in use rather than CPUs purchased.
Are people blind here?

>>61181029
>>61178522
>Intel shills will use this argument to discredit it, while ignoring the fact that it accurately paints all the past marked shares extremely accurately.

OOOOYYYYYYYYYYy

>>61178681
Anuda shoah

You know we would have the best prices/performance if both had 50% right?

Took them 11 years to release a cpu and gpu that wasn't shit

>>61181057
It's not in any way accurate though.

File: 1496362100894.png (143KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 480x360px

>>61178681
>greater than 10% market share gain by AMD and 10% loss by Intel

Holy shit, that's fucking huge.

File: 1489122339460.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>61178406
NOOOOOOOOOOOO

File: 1496423670269.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>61178522
Bad goy

>>61181091
But the 480/580 isn't shit (supreme price for performance when miners aren't making them cost a fucktruck) and Vega is total shit

>still 2/3
>ayymd keks celebrating
nice

File: rip (2).png (14KB, 659x382px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 659x382px

>>61178406

>>61178936
if they took 10% in one Q they already have more money than nvidia

>bought an i5 a couple of months ago
I want to vomit. I swear I'm going to vomit right on my desk.

>>61179134
I don't believe that Zen2 will hit 5GHz(Image is for Zen3? 7nm will I assume), I'm hoping for 4.5 GHz or so considering what we see with thermals/voltage currently if you try to push 4.1GHz, I do believe the 10% increase though to IPC which should be competitive to coffeelake, especially moreso with the inevitable price/perf standpoint.

AMD's CCX scale-ability is amazing honestly and should win over a LARGE number of people, I'm not sure what else Intel can do instead of creating a similar design. I do wish AMD did a straight 4c/8t single CCX to cut latency purely for gaming but I'm not sure how feasible this would even be within the arch and you would be limited to 2c-4c anyways.

Something like 80% yield is incredible especially considering the majority of the 20% will make R5/R3.

File: 1487808235004.jpg (21KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 300x300px

>>61178406
FAKE NEWS

>>61183163
>I'm hoping for 4.5 GHz or so considering what we see with thermals/voltage currently if you try to push 4.1GHz
7nm LP (which Zen2 will be based on) is widly different to 14nm LPP. It's an IBM node which means absolutely hellish clocks.

>>61179030
thank you based futuregoy

>>61183181
I'm from 2025. AMD is almost a monoply and implemented pajeet&jew botnet and anticonsumer practices. Intel now are the good guys and /g/ roots for them.

>>61179090

What the fuck are you even saying?

Looks exactly like the Trump v Hillary polls from July '16 straight into election night. An omen?

>>61178406
SHUT IT DOWN

>>61181029
good point, the share of new intel sales is probably even smaller than the graph lets on because of all the people running benches on their legacy intel products still in use.

>>61183180
I was under the assumption that Zen2 was 14nm again, probably read it early on during the R7s release. It looks like Zen2 it's 7nm, Zen3 is 7nm+.

In that case Zen2 looks to be a great improvement then, probably will wait out getting Zen2 personally unless Intel opens a secret vault.

>spend nearly two decades scamming people in all sorts of different ways, with bribing, fud, viral marketeers, overcharging for shit products etc
>make billions off it
>get a headstart so big, the other company couldn't compete on a single bracket
>jim "jew slayer" keller single handedly brings an end to it all

>>61183292
>opens a secret vault.
Another P6 derivative? LMAO.

File: frustrated.png (152KB, 1484x1092px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 1484x1092px

>>61180961
what a beautiful night it was..

>>61183163
>>61183292
Following on from this apparently whatever AMD is releasing Q1 2018 is refined Zen1, on 14nm+, with Zen2 coming late 2018. That's where the 4.5GHz came from as I was basing it on the 14nm+ refinement.

If I'm wrong please correct me.

>>61183297
Crazy bastards haven't changed much the last few years, given the R+D money pile they are sitting on surely they have something right?

>>61183365
> given the R+D money pile they are sitting on surely they have something right?
Their x86 R&D budget is barely bigger than AMD's. Money goes into fabs and memory. And networking.

File: 1498746210421.jpg (154KB, 888x676px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 888x676px

>>61183216
>poo

>release 100 new cpus
>people have to test them all
who knew

>>61183508
Then why is Intel dipping

>>61183803

'cuz they decided to upstage vega for biggest failure of the week.

>>61183803
well what do you think when the max is 100% and the other rises

>>61178522
Ryzen still got pins bro. Get over it.

>>61183508
and the same doesn't apply for intel?

>>61184147
what did they release again

>>61184334
SKL-X and KBL/KBL-X families.

>>61184363
in Q1?

>>61184383
KBL is totally Q1 2017.

File: 1498480988469.png (673KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

673KB, 808x805px

>>61178406
IT WILL BOUNCE!