So what did you switch to after you left firefox behind like any sane person?
I am using chromium. It works pretty well t b h. Is made by a big company, fully open source so not a botnet, and I am no longer stuck with a shitty chromium clone like fagfox
to Microsoft Edge
nothing wrong with firefox
I used chrome from 2011 until just recently and I prefer firefox again
>>61177953
It kinda sucks that is lacking some plugins though.
Went with Waterfox, but I'm willing to try Edge in the future.
>>61177953
>not a botnet
>not a bait
>>61177953
Vivaldi. Chrome's speed. Firefox's customization. Runs like shit on low-end systems tho
iridium
I've never liked Firefox.
>>61177953
>54
>got my addons
>no need to change anything
>>61177953
>Fully open source
It literally isn't, it's full of Google binary blobs
>>61178105
enjoy your security holes in a few years. you're as retarded as those fags running utorrent 2.2.1
elinks
>>61177953
>use chromium
>monitor network
>still phones home to google
fuck off
>>61178129
eh what do i care?
it's not like i am accessing the internet in a not secure way so even if i were to use internet explorer 6 i'd be completely fine
but unlike with you i don't have to leave behind addons i use on a regular basis
Firefox Nightly
>>61177953
Trying out Vivaldi. Really like the customization options. Putting tabs to the left for the hell of it. I still have Cyberfox installed since it has my 400+ tabs in the tab groups. I guess when I need something from those tabs, I'll just open Cyberfox and I'll keep on trying Vivaldi strictly for 4chan.
>>61178150
>not writing your own chromium branch
>giving a fuck about 'phoning home'
If the experience works properly and I can do the things I want to do and keep doing those things if I do happen to change desires on a whim, I don't care about my information being transmitted back to the corporation. If they are publicly revealed to be selling information to shady third parties, I'll care, if it starts to affect my life daily. If necessary, I'll get a fake SIN and live my life through that, or live off the grid.
Until it affects me, I will not care. Preventative measures are only worth the ounce of prevention they serve.
>>61178453
t.austism
ungoogled-chromium
Nightly for when ungoogled-chromium won't load a page
Epiphany
Nightly has really been shitting the bed on Windows for the past month or so.
A few of the issues plaguing me are:
>Can't middle click on currently open tab to close
>using ctrl+tab doesn't properly cycle through tabs
>sometimes a tab will disappear from the tab bar, and I will have to drag around other tabs for it to appear
>photon menu constantly freezes
What's the best thing to switch to? I was looking at ungoogled chromium and qutebrowser but I'm not sure which one to pick
Still fucking hate people at chromium for dropping side-tabs experiment feature. And all those years later - still nothing you can do. Damn retards.
I like waterfox
>>61178181
What benefits does Firefox Nightly offer as compared to vanilla Firefox?
>>61178578
It gets all the improvements several months in advance of the stable release, and it also allows installation of unsigned extensions.
I wouldn't recommend switching to it right now though, as it's been having quite a few issues while mozilla is switching to the photon UI and webextension system. Stick to stable for now.
>>61178467
nice meme kid
>>61178548
"i cant make changes to a repo myself so it's the fault of others" t. you
>>61177968
that is the only sensible answer, unless you're on windows 7 or XP, in which case internet explorer.
>>61178675
> "i cant make changes to a repo myself so it's the fault of others"
And being stuck with old version, cause new one won't build with that experiment? I won't refactor foreign codebase that big for that.
It's just their stupid argumentaion - https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=99332
>>61179257
>"I won't"
Notice how you said 'I'.
KEK and no one mentioned Brave.
I've switched to Brave.
>>61177953
Firefox Nightly :^)
>>61179307
Brave is almost as slow as FF
>>61179373
I've tried the comparison, it's faster. Maybe you just have a slow computer.
>>61177953
I'm using chrome, I'm not too worried about botnets and all media only starts to play after you first visit a newly opened tab.
Whereas in Firefox you have to fiddle in the about:config settings with media.autoplay.enabled and after that some videos will refuse to start alltogether.
I periodically do check if they have resolved it.
>>61179403
>it's faster
That's what I said moran.
But both are slow as heck
>>61179426
>watching videos in a browser
stahp that
safari
I still use Chrome in windows
>>61179432
It's *moron, moron.
Firefox ESR
when they drop support for addons I will just switch to Pale Moon
>>61177953
It's still a botnet....????
Also- Comodo Dragon (pic related) is the ONLY good chrome fork, added security enhancements, sick ass logo, google chrome but without the botnet.. no reason you shouldn't be using this browser
alternatively pale moon is a good choice, it's like firefox but it has a bookmarks bar which is a game changer since every other firefox fork doesn't have one.
>>61177953
I switched to GNU icecat. A fully free version of firefox.
chromium
Opera, it's done me good so far
>>61178453
This is such a dumb argument what
Why wouldn't you take protective measures so you aren't affected when they are publicly revealed to be selling information? It's not like it's hard to protect yourself anyway
>>61180112
because 'protecting' myself usually means gimping myself to the point of not being able to use many quality of life features
let's all just go to w3m!!!! fun!!!!!!!
>>61180121
Okay I have no problem with that just don't say dumb shit
I completely deleted firefox from my phone and mac. Still miss the background music and video playing though.
>>61180139
ill say all the shit i want you stupid fucking gay shit fucker ass cunt boy bitch BITCH fuckwer
>>61179734
>>61177953
Not leaving firefox behind until I have to. The WebRTC leak has yet to be fixed in Chromium browsers, and you can't disable it. You can only use an easily circumvented plugin.
>>61178602
Wouldn't you also get the unwanted advancements (like what's coming in FF 57) early?
>>61178535
Have you considered not running an alpha version? Jesus christ
>>61178535
>Actually wanting to help FF release 57.
Why?