Will Ryzen get a budget cpu?
Ryzen 3 this quarter, APUs probably very late in the year.
>>61171208
Yes, 4c4t R3 chips are coming. They were advertised during the Ryzen Pro reveal recently. There'll be APUs at some point too.
Aren't ryzen r3 supposed to be like 100$-120$? That's not really budget.
>>61171255
How do you even know the price?
Heck we didn't even know Ryzen 7 pricing until 2 days before release.
Ryzen IS a budget CPU
>>61171245
rumour has it they are stable @5ghz pulling less than 120W TDP
>>61171290
That won't ever happen on Zen's current 14nm process.
>>61171245
r3's will be double the price of the g4560
>>61171378
The G4560 is already up to $75 on PC part picker.
>>61171378
So you're saying that the R3s will both be the same price as the R5 1400? Seems unlikely, but I'll heed your expert opinion on this matter, anon.
If they can put a Ryzen quad core in the $99-119 range, then they would win the price-performance ratio. G4560 has a nice Single Thread performance and HT is nice, but it is still a dual core. In 2017.
>>61171447
>G4560 has a nice Single Thread performance
No, it doesn't. Anything except K-series i3/i5/i7 is the same single core speed as Ryzen. And it loses once you overclock it, which non-K series can't do.
>and HT is nice
AMD's SMT is 25-30% more efficient than Intel's HT.
>>61171417
i bought a g4560 for like 55 bucks at microcenter
stop
>>61171429
i bet that they will cost $129 and $149
>>61171482
Microcenter has dirt cheap prices, but not everyone has access to one.
>>61171482
>everybody lives next to a Microcenter
The cheapest you can buy a G4560 online is $75.
https://pcpartpicker.com/product/8gKhP6/intel-pentium-g4560-35ghz-dual-core-processor-bx80677g4560
>>61171487
Yeah, I'm sure they'll position one of them $10 below the R5 1400. That seems super likely. You're a clever girl, anon.
>>61171474
G4560 is still dirt cheap though. You get actually decent performance in a lot of games and basic scenarios for what you pay.
>>61171541
Yeah, $75 is still not a bad price. Still not going to be worth it when you can get a $100 OC-able quad core with the same/better single threaded performance (Once you OC)
>>61171563
Yup, which is what I said here >>61171447
>>61171255
Are you really that poor? Just buy used for priced <$100
>>61171290
>>61171255
They should have prices like Core i3s.
Eventually there should be something cheaper too, maybe dualcores made from disabled APUs, in Q1 2018/Q2 2018?
Supposedly they are preparing a special dualcore APU too, but that one will have single channel RAM reportedly.
>>61172316
I assume they're looking at a Jaguar replacement. My guess would be 2C4T, ditch the L3 and half the IO-ports, add half an RX550.
>>61171208
yes dumbo
will it be on par with the g4560?
i doubt it, that was priced so aggressively at the entry level