>it's 2015 What the fuck Spotify?

>>51556717
>using Spotify

>>51556734
>listen to music for free
>without being a filthy pirate
>get useful suggestions

9/10 would use again

File: skepticalman.png (70KB, 286x101px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 286x101px

>>51556717
>install Adobe Flash. It's free.

>>51556734
This as well.

>>51556751
>using botnet DRM services to listen to music

>>51556717
Why the fuck are you still using Wangblows?

There's a linux version that works really nice.

>>51556787
>nonfree client

wtf?

also op look for the unoffical api documentation and write some shitty hack using python.

>>51556818
> I only use software hastily made by neck-beards who receive no compensation
Who's jewing who here?

Like most "music screaming" disservices, Spotify is based on proprietary malware (DRM and snooping). Recently it demanded users submit to increased snooping[1], and some are starting to realize that it is nasty.

However, it was nasty all along. Any "service" that is based on not letting people have their own copies is a scheme to subjugate people. Once you submit, they are always ready to use that leverage to subjugate you more.

This article[2] shows the twisted ways that they present snooping as a way to serve users better — never mind whether they want that. This is a typical example of the attitude of the proprietary software industry towards those they have subjugated.

Out, out, damned Spotify!

Copyright (c) 2015 Richard Stallman. Verbatim copying and redistribution of this entire page are permitted provided this notice is preserved.


[1]: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/aug/21/spotify-faces-user-backlash-over-new-privacy-policy
[2]: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/08/21/spotify_worse_than_the_nsa/

File: spotifyflash.png (15KB, 343x173px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 343x173px

>>51556953
OP here

nevermind, I fixed it :^)

>>51556989
The Adobe flash plug-in is non-free software, and people should not
install it, or suggest installing it, or even tell people it exists.