Website rebuild and minor redesign, part 2

Is FX 6300 really the best AMD processor to get?

I propose adding a category after "Monstrous".

"literally a supercomputer"

>>51516099
It is not the best, but it is good for mid-tier gaming. You can get the 8320 (or 8350, since the black friday deals are on), if you like.

File: Too Wide.png (115KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1366x768px

>>51516066
Boxes look too thick.
And site not loading correctly.

>>51516099
For that price? yes.
8350 is a good option too for a bit more.

>>51516099
The FX 6350 and 8320 are clearly in that picture you half wit

>>51516105
I want to add a new category, but only after SLI/CF scaling with 3-4 cards is worth it.

>>51516127
No difference with uBlock origin off other that it does autoselect region.

>>51516133
Should be relatively soon with Pascal around the corner right? Should be interesting.

>>51516127
>Boxes look too thick.
Length-wise? Height-wise?

>And site not loading correctly.
I cannot see the issue on your screenshot. What is wrong with it?

Thanks for the feedback!

>>51516147
Ok, cool. That is the desired behaviour: If the site knows your country, to load your country's table. If not, it will default to loading the USA table.

>>51516154
>Length-wise? Height-wise?
Height wise.

>What is wrong with it?
Just that i have to move around to see the total price, unlike with the original site.

>>51516066
I know this is slightly off topic,but could you possibly update the A- panel list? Many of those monitors seem to be not available anymore.

File: Untitled.png (92KB, 805x720px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 805x720px

>>51516189
Ok, I understand. The old table, when squeezed, would stack the cell text, pic related. People complained that it looked really ugly, and that there should be a fixed minimum width.

In the new table, I added a minimum width.

Would you consider adding a guide for other case form factors, or a Facebook machine build.

>>51516066
>still no Xeon builds

I don't trust Intel's "antitheft", and I'm sure there's someone else on /g/ that agrees with me.

>>51516204
I am doing that now. Goal is to have screens updated by this weekend. Already updated the gaming screens to be current.

I apologize for being late with screens. Many people have pointed out that the screen section is outdated, but I have not been able to find the time, till very recently.

>>51516228
>Facebook machine
DESTITUTE TIER

I have a FX-6300 and an HD 7850 (2 GB)

Would a new GPU (probably NVidia) be enough to allow me to play new games on high for the next two years? Or should I get a new CPU too?

>>51516293
7850 ~= R7 265 ~= R7 370

What is your budget? If you can afford a significantly better card than the 370, then it is worth upgrading.

File: Sorry for watermark, lazy to crack it.webm (602KB, 1360x768px) Image search: [Google]

602KB, 1360x768px

>>51516223
I saw that problem in the last thread and i understand it.
Its just that its quite annoying to have to scroll horizontally.

Meanwhile about the thick boxes, i feel like its just wasted space.
Length-wise looks good.

>>51516322

I suppose the same as when I bought the 7850, $200 or so. Guess a GTX 960 or a R9 380X.

>>51516353
I am about 00 pixels off making the sire 1366x768 friendly. I will try and see what I can do.

Thank you for the feedback!

>>51516398
>I am about 00 pixels off
100*

File: cutoff.png (75KB, 690x713px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 690x713px

It would be cool if, when hovering over things, it would intelligently decide whether to show the tooltip thing below or above.

Sometimes it gets cut off and you need to scroll down when there's perfectly usable space above.

>>51516468
I have this issue with the original version too.

Also what i would be missing if i wanted to use a GA-B85M-D3H instead a GA-Z97X-UD3H for a I5-4460 and a GTX 750Ti?

Awesome job you're doing, Falcon. I seriously hope you become rich or something.

File: Screen Shot 2015-11-25 at 17.55.42.png (86KB, 1026x508px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1026x508px

Stray 'T' in the text

>>51516468
>>51516489
I am using Qtip, which has not changed from the old version to the new. Yes, I am aware of this, but it will have to wait till I fix the other bugs first.

Thanks for the feedback!

>>51516577
Good catch. Thanks!

Some info on features for certain products would be good.
i.e.
>ASUS X99-A
>Supports 3-way 16x SLI, M.2 SSD

>Corsair 200R
>8 fan slots, toolless drive bays, USB 3.0

>>51516700
Corsair 200r is recommended in Mexico list over HAF912.

>>51516066
how cheap can you go and still play 1080p video stably?

>>51516725
Destitute build should be able to play 1080p videos. Even 10-bit

>>51516700
I have done this for GPU, RAM, and HDDs, and PSUs to a certain extent. Will need to do that for cases and mobos. Thanks!

I'm not sure you should be recommending a 5820k in an SLI build. Varies from mobo to mobo but if you use a 5820k with the X99-Gaming-G1 WIFI recommended in the Extremist build you'll only be getting 8x and 4x on the two GPUs, which would be a pretty heavy bottleneck on even the 980.

Why not recommend the EVGA 600B for a cheap 600W PSU?

>>51516798
They're hec OEM.

Speaking of 80+ PSUs, the EVGA 430W isn't 80 plus bronze. It's 80+.

>>51516773
>you'll only be getting 8x and 4x on the two GPUs

Quoting:

"2 x PCI Express x16 slots, running at x16 (PCIE_1, PCIE_2)
* For optimum performance, if only one PCI Express graphics card is to be installed, be sure to install it in the PCIE_1 slot; if you are installing two PCI Express graphics cards, it is recommended that you install them in the PCIE_1 and PCIE_2 slots.
2 x PCI Express x16 slots, running at x8 (PCIE_3, PCIE_4)
* The PCIE_4 slot shares bandwidth with the PCIE_1 slot. When the PCIE_4 slot is populated, the PCIE_1 slot will operate at up to x8 mode.
* When an i7-5820K CPU is installed, the PCIE_2 slot operates at up to x8 mode and the PCIE_3 operates at up to x4 mode.
(All PCI Express x16 slots conform to PCI Express 3.0 standard.)"

Doesn't this mean that with two cards installed, you get x8/x8?

>>51516862
Fixed. Thanks!

>>51516066
You gotta work on those peripherals. Those are all old and outdated. Last updated on N/A is a bit of an issue.

>>51516066
Thanks for the great site. I just used it for a build today.

One thing I noticed, links for MSI Z97 PC Mate and ASRock H97 Pro4 are backwards.

>>51516947
Mice and gaming screens are updated. Normal screens by this weekend.

Keyboard, not sure.

>>51516890
Many people would be using dual-slot cooler GPUs, I assume.
As noted a 5820k forces the 3rd slot to 4x mode due to its limited PCI-e lanes (I assume).

Some unsubstantiated forum posts from quick googling say that 16x/4x or 8x/4x does cause performance issues, but I haven't found definitive benchmarks.

It's best to err on the side of caution.

>>51517018
Considering recently I've only been looking at keyboards and normal screens that makes sense.

On another note seriously thanks for the site. I used it for my first self built PC and now whenever anyone asks me for hardware recommendations I take them there.

>>51517020
>It's best to err on the side of caution.
That is a good point. I will check for mobos with more space between them.

Thank you.

>>51517057
Most welcome. It is a good site because of community feedback. You comments, suggestions, and criticisms are what makes it good.

Op is that table part of the code? If so and if the table is taking too long to load screenshot it and make it a image

>>51517125
Same person but even if then its not fast enough put it on imgur and then link it into the code. It might make all the difference

>>51517125
>>51517149
It is loaded, not part of the coded. It covers many different countries beside the USA, and each table is loaded on demand.

File: IMG_0514.png (134KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 750x1334px

We gucci on mobiles now

>>51517076
To make this perfectly clear:
5820k has 28 PCIe lanes. With a 5930k or 5960x it will have full bandwidth (40 lanes), but with the wifi card installled with the board will take bandwidth. As will the SSD if an M.2 PCIe X4 ssd is installed.
>* When an i7-5820K CPU is installed, the PCIE_2 slot operates at up to x8 mode and the PCIE_3 operates at up to x4 mode.
> x8 mode and x4 mode.

>>51517476
Noted. I will find a replacement mobo ASAP.

>>51516489
>Also what i would be missing if i wanted to use a GA-B85M-D3H instead a GA-Z97X-UD3H for a I5-4460 and a GTX 750Ti?
Any reccomendations about this?
I'm about to buy everything this friday.

>>51517753
Nothing is missing. You just lose a few moo features (ability to OC) etc.

>>51517840
I was planning to get a locked CPU so its not a problem, what other features im going to miss?

>>51517840
>You just lose a few moo features
mobo*, not moot.

>>51517876
For the full list of differences: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=-1&IsNodeId=1&Description=GA-Z97X-UD3H&bop=And&CompareItemList=-1%7C13-128-607%5E13-128-607%2C13-128-710%5E13-128-710&percm=13-128-710%3A%24%24%24%24%24%24%24

Also remember that the UD3H has better power management, though that may be less of an issue since you do not OC.

>>51517893
I guess i will buy the UD3H after all, PSU and Motherboard are some stuff i don't see myself replacing ever so better invest on them.

>>51517928
>>51517893
Also do you think a 430W PSU would be enough for that build? or should i push it for 500W?

>>51517614
It's less of a mobo problem and more of a CPU problem, although a more expensive mobo should support at *least* 8x/8x. Note that with stuff like M.2 Key M and other PCIe peripherals, you'll have even more bandwidth issues.

>>51517942
A quality PSU at 430W is fine: http://www.anandtech.com/show/7764/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-750-ti-and-gtx-750-review-maxwell/22

>>51517958
Yeah, I may take out the 5820K altogether, so as not to worry about it.

Any more feedback on the staging site? Can I take it live?

New site: http://www.logicalincrements.com/staging/#!/

Is it ok? Can I take it live? Any bugs?

On my side, I do not see any issues/bugs.

>>51518074
Other than it doesn't fit in a 1366x768 resolution correctly looks fine.

>>51518103
I cannot get it smaller than 1450 pixels for now, but I will prioritize getting it back to 1366-width compatibility later.

td cells too high, perhaps decrease them by 4 px and the font by 1pt?

>No 3x Fury X tier

Dropped.

>>51518302
That, I will leave to a designer... maybe.

Site is live.

Could you maybe make a section for people who aren't looking to play games, but rather do business applications or run CAD or setup servers?

>>51518649
I will add a new table, for non-gaming setups. But that is a bit far in the future. There are so many things to add before that.

Why isn't the 3258 on the list anywhere?

>>51518664
Alright. Pretty cool so far. Keep up the good work.

File: Untitled.png (27KB, 1788x143px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 1788x143px

>>51518681

>>51518706
Well now I feel silly

Have you considered adding the amazon/newegg review score next to the part when you mouse over it along with the other info?

I noticed quite a few bad reviews for the RAMPAGE V EXTREME even though it's considered the higher quality of the monstrous tier.

Minor nitpick, but the image of the stock cooler of the 860k is instead the cooler from the FX processor family. I think the major difference is that the Athlon's cooler has no copper heat pipes or something.

>>51518746
I am not sure if that is a good. Review scores are skewed, particularly when they are few in number. People are more likely to submit a score when they are angry.

>>51518800
Google is of no help: Where can I get a decent image of the 860K stock cooler?

>being a tester
>for free

>>51516066
Maybe add closed circuit water coolers?

File: Untitled.png (273KB, 2026x1232px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 2026x1232px

>>51518872
> closed circuit water coolers
Closed loop, you mean?

>>51518894
Whoops I'm had a retarded
My bad

Why isn't the enthoo pro M or the fractal define design S in any of your recommendations? These 2 are pretty much best in class in class at their price point.

Newegg is selling the design S for 59.99$ right now.

>>51518912
I can look into them. But this is about getting feedback for the new rebuilt site, whether it has errors/issues/bugs, not about the content within. I will definitely do a thorough sweep of the content once I am confident that the site is bug free.

Dude this is awesome
Wish it was more mobile friendly but this has already been a huge help
Keep it up

>>51518937
Thank you. I am already looking to redesign the site a little, to make it better on mobile. For now, this change already improves things a lot, even though it is not perfect yet.

>>51518947
Are you planning an app or just make a mobile version of the site?

Oh god, I clicked the "tee hee" and my browser died.

>>51518986
No app, just a more mobile friendly version of the site.

File: Screen 2015-11-25 10-21-35.png (68KB, 1229x872px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 1229x872px

The expandable component info at the end is often taller than the screen. While easy to navigate when all are collapsed, its a clusterfuck when you expand most of them.

Add a collapse button the the bottom of each section, so you can close it after reading, without having to scroll up

>>51519150
Good point! Noted.

Thanks!

>>51516066
Love the site man

Falcon, do you have a working with children license?

>>51518827
Would amazon not have pictures of it?

>>51516973
I missed this post earlier. Fixed. Thanks!

>>51519242
http://www.amazon.com/AMD-Athlon-Black-3700Mhz-AD860KXBJABOX/dp/B00MU00IOQ/

They do not. And neither does newegg.

>>51519240
What sort of license is that?

>>51519225
Thank you.

>>51519317
>What sort of license is that?
a license you gat obtain if you work with children a lot. it serves two purposes. One, it lets the children parents know that you have skills to work with children, and 2nd, it also covers your ass if there were any accidents or anything to the children you are responsible for

>>51519354
I am a programmer, I do not work with children. Also, is that a NA thing? I am in SEA, and I have never heard of such a thing before.

>>51519365
all this guide stuff though is focused on children, and you get their input all the time for improvements. I'm just saying that a licence on the site showing that you are trained to work with children will give the children parents reassurance when they see their children on your site.

>>51519416
disregard that, i suck cocks

>>51519416
You really took 30 minutes to make that joke?

Hold on, I can turn this around. Give me a few minutes.

>>51519365
Hey! The website has been extremely helpful so far. Thank you for your work! Keep it up

>>51519449
it's not a joke.

>>51519365
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XrnWfuZTK4

File: Untitled.png (180KB, 2557x1272px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 2557x1272px

>>51519480
For you.

>>51519469
You are welcome. Your encouragement is appreciated!

>>51519501
>123 unread emails
>inbox has over 1000 emails
Sort your shit out

The donation was pretty funny though

>>51519578
I can barely keep up. I get 10-15 emails a day, and if you take ~10-15 minutes to respond to each, your whole day is gone!

Consider adding speakers/headphones/microphones to peripherals
Maybe sound cards too

>>51519589
I don't need to respond to most of the emails I get
I guess your life is just busier than mine

>>51519612
>I guess your life is just busier than mine
Busy life has its ups and downs. I admit that sometimes I want to just relax and read a book, undisturbed and unworried.

>>51519501
The more you donate, the more i feel bad. hint hint

>>51519756
My intention was not to make you feel bad. Also, I am not an oil baron.

>>51519808
if i make even badder jokes can you donate to assistance dogs australia?

>>51519808
>Also, I am not an oil baron.
it would be great if you were though, as you seem rather charitable

>>51519888
Maybe some day. Everyone can dream, no?

I guess that that is that. I will be updating the screens page next.

thanks for this website bruv i am running battlefront on 4k 90FPS

File: aaa.jpg (156KB, 1903x938px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 1903x938px

Dunno if this is due to my extensions, but I have a image not loading box.

>>51520552
ignore that, it started loading when i refreshed.

>>51520558
Thanks for the feedback anyway!

File: no good.jpg (229KB, 1364x692px) Image search: [Google]

229KB, 1364x692px

>>51516066
looks pretty bad on my low resolution monitor using chromium, cant see the star ratings on the builds, the previous version of the site was much nicer even if it took a longer time loading

>>51520666
I need to fix the qtip to properly handle very small resolutions. Sorry about the inconvenience, anon.

>>51520693
just trying to help :)

File: Screen Shot 2015-11-25 at 11.26.25.png (47KB, 1348x632px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1348x632px

>>51516066
Most people stated the boxes being too big and such. Liked that there are other country prices but some need different motherboards as they can't be used as a recommendation everywhere. i.e. Brazil getting some R$1k - 3.5k recommendations.
The font is fine, for some reason on the screenshot it got smudged.

File: IMG_0875.png (407KB, 1242x2208px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1242x2208px

Announcements frame not aligning properly on phone tried different browsers and landscape/portrait with the same results.

>>51516066
Don't use so freaking many external css, scripts, frames etc.
You know tinfoils on /g/ use RequestPolicy, NoScript, uMatrix.

Try and keep the amount of stuff you need to whitelist to make the site usable to a minimum.
And don't use Google Botnet stuff like gstatic.com