>Most microcontroller use gcc >Many libraries only build

>Why is Microsoft still pushing MSVC and cmd/PS?
Because it's Microsoft. They push their own, always. PS still a shit btw.

>Will Microsoft ever make Windows fully UNIX-like?
Do you mean like Unix Services for Windows? Otherwise there's little motivation.

>Will Microsoft ever make Windows fully UNIX-like?

Can you please stop falling for the meme that everything good is always UNIX-like

>>51503471
>Unix Services for Windows
No, I mean instead of their \.\\Device_Root\HHD0 stuff, just use /dev/sda, and so forth, also bash instead of cmd...

Why would there be little motivation?
A shit ton of new projects on GitHub only work fine on *nix...

>Because it's Microsoft. They push their own, always.
I thought Salty Nutella was different?

>Will MS ever make Windows fully UNIX-like?
You know, Win 2k had POSIX apps support.
>Why MSVC and cmd/PS
Because they basically fucking built everything on them and it's not a good time right now to change it.

>>51503495
this, dave cutler produced a nice foundation with the nt kernel but they've let it rot and stagnate since then

what a waste

>Most microcontroller use gcc

you must live in a small world.

>>51503495
> those are the reasons Windows would benefit from being UNIX-like
> MEME MEME MEME

You do realize you sound like a, right?

>>51503589
>'reasons'
>only appeals to 0.001% of their users
>'Many libraries only build with gcc or clang'
>supporting vendor lock in

you're as cancerous as ms

>>51503608
So talk about that in your post. I am not on either side. I'm just pointing out that you look a retard when you make a post and your main argument is MEME MEME MEME.

>>51503625
You didn't even point that out in your post, you left the sentence half completed.

>>51503631
Fine, I messed up. My point still stands.

>>51503502
>>Because it's Microsoft. They push their own, always.
>I thought Salty Nutella was different?
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.