4970k vs 6700k

if you're a kek.

no change from haswell to skylake unless youre using iGPU.

>>51487198
Not much, but unless you get a nice discount on the 4970k I'd get the 6700k anyways.

Not really.
Access to DDR4 perhaps.

>>51487198
Do you give a shit about power usage or multiple M.2 slots?
If not, nope.

>>51487198
Larger number > lower number

Go for it OP, unless you find a processor with higher numbers in the title

>>51487198
Apart from a %5 performance increase at best, you won't benefit buying a 6700k. Just buy a 5820k if you want something better than a 4790k. Also ddr4 is a meme.

Think of it in terms of differences in motherboard features than performance.

If you think that Z170 offers anything useful or substantial for you over Z97, then get it, otherwise it's a toss up and get the one that you can find for "cheaper".

File: pic_disp.jpg (44KB, 650x470px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x470px

>>51487269
The 6700k sometimes even draw more power than a 4790k, that's memelake for you.

>>51487198
>http://www.anandtech.com/show/9483/intel-skylake-review-6700k-6600k-ddr4-ddr3-ipc-6th-generation/23
>In our discrete gaming benchmarks, at 3GHz Skylake actually performs worse than Haswell at an equivalent clockspeed, giving up an average of 1.3% performance.
It's definitely not worth it, go with the older one unless you need the IGP.

>>51487493
Kek

>>51487910
draws*