is there any good r.a.t out there?

>>51461569
If you use a computer mouse like that you don't deserve to live

That looks like it's straight from a 2003 music video.

I have an original rat 7, its perfect

>>51461846
better than razer da?

>>51461884
I havent tried it, but sensor is perfect for fps and I can adjust it however I want since I have small hands. Its pretty modular too.

I didn't try out razer da so I can't compare it.

>>51461935
b-but rat 7 is a laser mouse.
it doesn't even come close to true optical gaming mouse.

>>51461978
Ive only used super shit 10$ mouses you could get at any computer store, so this is much easier to aim with.

But as I said, I have no problem aiming with it. I have it for probably 4-5 years.

File: 136907095363.png (738KB, 984x737px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 984x737px

>>51462009
thank you anyway, i was literally in same situation like you, but instead rat 7 i was using rat 3, and i want to buy something better. Now i'm looking for something more competitive than that, but i don't want to throw out my bucks like trash, so i'm just asking for opinion.

But something tells me, that whole mad catz mouse series is just a bunch of shit for it price.

>>51462113
Ive been looking at prices of it today and thats a bit too much for it imho, when there are so many better bare bones competitors.

Especially since I don't need a "snipe" button or horizontal scrolling wheel.

I don't really get the hate besides the fact its madcatz and people don't like its design desu. Oh and I replaced it 3 times in three years span, good thing it was under warranty. And in fourth year it sensor stopped broking, but left button stopped clicking, but I managed to fix that and its pretty good still! So id have to say that build quality is pretty weird, since sensor doesn't break anymore. Buy what you like tho.

Hope this helps!

>>51461569
I had a RAT 9 a while ago, and the shit sucked. The build quality wasn't great, it would always lose connection, and the battery lasted maybe a day. The receiver always glitched out, and the sensor was pretty shit. The whole thing was flimsy because of it's "modular" nature, and it wasn't very comfortable. I've got a G502 now, and its 100x better

>>51461569
I believe the madcatz RAT 3 has a 'perfect' sensor. It's good for small hands.