Is this shit ever going to die?

>>51426285
/thread

File: 1437623712050.jpg (20KB, 249x249px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 249x249px

>>51426266
No as long my H@H client keeps running

File: The_C_Programming_Language,_First_Edition_Cover_(2).svg.png (150KB, 2000x2810px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 2000x2810px

>>51426266
Will this shit ever die off?

>>51426266
Why would you want it die? It just werks™

>>51426307
It most definitely not just werks

>>51426330
If it doesn't fucking work then why do android apps work (most are written in java)?

JVM is good, Java 8 itself is shit.

Use Scala or Clojure if you have to use the JVM.

>>51426485
>JVM is good
>JVM is good
>JVM is good
>2015
>JVM is good

That's the worst part of Java.

File: chuck.gif (204KB, 404x416px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 404x416px

>>51426390
>android
>working

>>51426266
No. It's productive and easy to learn.

>>51426266
>Mein Kunst
Never. Microsoft will literally make their own before they let it die.

>>51426266
never
Anyway, back to work.
I was just writing this nice ContainerServiceWatcherInstanceEventManagerManagerConsumerMap<K,T> class, do you guys think I should provide an interface in case someone wants to roll his own ?

>>51426630
That's alright, you're only 15 years late.
MS already tried to make their won version of Java and miserably failed at it.

So they made C# as a better alternative, and it worked.
Java dying is literally MS wet dream.

File: 1442521621454.webm (585KB, 198x360px) Image search: [Google]

585KB, 198x360px

>>51426582
nice meme

>>51426677
>Implying they won't try again

>>51426631
I actually do this at work and I love it

>>51426724
why would they do that when they already have a better version of it

>>51426631
Yeah. You should also make a facade that implements the interface and calls everything on that map object. Ya know, to make it more extendable

>>51426946
Because of dat sweet minecraft skiddie dosh.

>>51426999
They'd rather port it to an actual engine in C#/DX

>>51426574
JVM is good because it's written in C to be fast.

>>51426582
Android is such a piece of shit. I can't stand an OS that just drops messages/events left and right. Come to think of it, Javascript does that too.

>>51427078
lol'd

>>51426306
>comparing C and Java

File: javafasterthanc++.jpg (42KB, 523x449px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 523x449px

>>51427208

>>51426306
>most portable and power languages in existence
yeaaaaa no

>>51427372

> no units

Confirmed for liberal arts

Java is a cool and fun language. I might think differently if I had to work with enterprise code, but I play with it on the side and it's just neat.

File: Liebherr_LR11000.jpg (184KB, 591x787px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 591x787px

>>51426631
>>51426739
>>51426955

I am new to programming and I've been learning Java (bad decision)? I was a bit overwhelmed by all of the event watcher and handler stuff. Is this normal of all languages? Or is it easier in other languages?

What you mean? Java is the most advanced programming language on earth.

>>51427649
OOP is shit for some stuff and good for others. Generally I prefer non-OOP languages

>>51427372
Sure thing.

>>51426266
General purpose, beginner friendly, object-oriented, huge class library, universally accessible, syntax derived from C/++.

Why does it need to die?

no because there is a real world outside of your basement. Keep programming in C, jerking off to chinese cartoon girls and living in your mothers basement, while companies and non-morons will earn money with Java.

>>51427649
Its more or less the culture of java. You can go overboard with oop. Like >>51427697 said its good for some things and bad for others.

>muh 6 billion devices

>>51426718

You know Apple does shit right when autistic faggots literally put a spotlight on the few instances of issues that comes up.

It just shows you that Android plebs are so used to issues that it's just the norm. lol

>>51427819
>>51427594
When will you retards realize that Java is just as fast as C? It's the bloat that kills Java, not the speed.

>>51428051
Except it's not.

And let's get precise: Java bytecode execution is NOT faster than machine code (to what C, C++, ... is translated), especially for arithmetic operations, like the ones mentioned in the graph above.

That in itself doesn't make Java/the JVM shit. It's just ridiculous to pretend it's better or equivalent at this particular point when it's obviously not.

No, because it, and the JVM, are fucking awesome.

>>51428198

Ha, what?

Java code is executed as machine code, the same as C, C++ and every other programming language.

You might want to brush up on what a compiler actually does there bud