discuss

>>51411942
I'll admit I kekd but this is about as accurate as the one about Samsung's stupid 4K resolution, which was still pretty accurate. Only thing is that if this is OC it's a bit late.

File: Capture3.png (1MB, 1048x441px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1048x441px

You can actually tell a 1080p vs 1440p phone screen apart if you don't have shitty vision. Anything higher than 1440p is batshit insane a phone though. 4K res would be breddy good for a 12" Tablet though.

I dont care as long as it's helping us get to glorius 16K resolution VR.

>>51411942
It's the only way to push chip manufacturers to make faster chips. We could have had 360p res on all phones since 2005 and just made chips more power efficient.

Instead we have exynos and snapdragon wrecking each other's shit as the the most based ARM chip for phones.

4K phones aren't that far away. The Note 6 might sport a 4K screen and a snapdragon 920 or something.

>>51412273
Isn't the Z5 a 4K phone?

>>51412414
The Z5 premium is and it's a fucking meme. That 4K screen is rendered by a 810 house fire and only 3GB of RAM.

>>51412087
I have a 5.3" 1440p phone screen, and I literally can't see the pixels. I can very clearly see the pixels on an iPhone, but for some reason people try to argue that they can't... Just defending their purchase, I guess.

>>51412470
>le 810 house fire may may
They fixed the overheating problem like a year ago bruh.

>>51412502

...aren't you literally doing the same thing in this very post?

>>51413297
I'm not defending anything, I'm just affirming what he said.

>>51411942

Not too long ago Apple fans were claiming anything over 4'' was shit.

tl;dr you're a hypocrite