>run code on C that does "thing" >0.00136 seconds

>>51410586
the java solution is more portable

>>51410586
Now do the timing inside the program. Startup of the JVM costs a fixed amount of time, but the program itself won't be more than 20% slower.

>>51410586
>Bothering about Java

>>51410964
>bothering with the most used computer language of all time

>>51411008
popular != good

>write code on C that does "thing"
>300 lines later, the program is done
>write code on Java that does "thing"
>50 lines later, the program is done

Non-systems-programming programmers will defend this.

File: beels :DDDDDD.jpg (32KB, 528x404px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 528x404px

>>51410586

And what is this "thing"? A full, working application that solves a real-world problem?

Or some shitty one-line hello world?

>>51410674
good meme

>>51411032
Literally a conditional.

File: 1403033649685.png (249KB, 406x403px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 406x403px

>>51411025
What is this even supposed to mean, retard? No one is pointing a gun at millions of coders to make their programs in Java. Java is the most popular because its the most powerful language.

>>51411027

try
{
   //Protected code
}catch(ExceptionName e1)
{
   //Catch block
}

File: beels :DDDDDD.png (23KB, 528x404px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 528x404px

>>51411061
You've just proved my point. Which is you take literally two lines of code in C and Java and think you've made a worthwhile comparison.

Why not compare actual, functioning applications?

>write a code in C that does "thing"
>takes 1 second
>write a code in C++ that does "thing"
>takes 0 second, done at compile time

>>51411116
>muh templates

>>51411106
If Java takes 2 seconds to make a simple conditional, it will snowball for a full program.

File: exceptions.jpg (82KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 680x680px

>>51411098

>>51411098

try {
    //Protected code
} catch(ExceptionName e1) {
    //Catch block
}

ftfy

File: bobod xDDDDDDDD.jpg (56KB, 749x442px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 749x442px

>>51411144
Nice tripdubs, but you're retarded and you don't know what you're talking about.

>>51411144
You haven't actually profiled two implementations of the same non-trivial system.

Clojure, gg.

>>51411027
http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/java.html
Total of gziped code sizes (which is only a fair comparison if you're using an IDE with autocomplete, if not then C wins):
Java: 14307
C: 14422
Practically identical

But total time taken:
Java: 84.99
C: 50.17
Great victory for C, Java is 69% slower.

>>51410674
>more portable
>than c

hahahahahahahahahaha

>>51411098
>ExceptionName e1
>implying that you're going to have any more than 1 e in scope

>C
>program code on linux
>it includes libcurl
>try to compile for windows
>fail horribly
fucking hell

>>51411340
Write once, run everywhere you pleb

>Java
>SIMD
Choose one

>Java
>Efficient memory management
Choose one

>Java
>Horrible build tools from Satan himself
Choose two

>Java
>Runs without installing JRE
Choose one

C for embedded and OS level programs.

Java for servers and clusters.

Why choose?

>using Boilerplate: The Language

>>51411431
you forgot the fine print for everywhere*

*for some values of everywhere

>>51410586
cool, now run it in Python

File: 12241673_953297274756938_9035110955890696189_n.jpg (14KB, 480x434px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x434px

>>51411091
>most powerful language
>Java

>>51410586
>write code in Java
>get a job
>write code in C
>complain on 4chan

File: 6dc.jpg (38KB, 640x428px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 640x428px

>>51411894
>>Writing on an OS probably written in C
>> Written by people with actual jobs
Shitty b8. 0/10

>>51411403
>>Microsoft Windows
>>Visual Studio

>>51410586
Compile it and run it on a machine you've never seen before.

Good luck.

>>51410586
>code badly in java
>blame the language

>>51411025
>popular != good
>popular !== good
Fixed

>>51410586
What did you expect? Java is interpreted, it can't even be put in the same category as C.

>>51411431
except non-java platforms.

IE, embedded systems. You know, the things that real programmers work with to make lots of money.

Nobody wants Java on an ATM or security system.

>>51412171
Well, java won't run on an AVR chip, so I guess that's that.

File: Bait in 3d.jpg (100KB, 450x664px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 450x664px

>>51412527

>>51412748
Jet fuel can't melt steel bait

>>51410916
This.

>>51410674
Ideally this too, but it took a hacked version of .net called mono.

If OP wanted a real comparison, he should have used python or php. C does shit in 50ns that php will do in 50ms, yes 1000 times slower. You try making a graph of that. Meanwhile, php devs are currently jizzing over the fact that php 7 is three times faster... And still hundreds of times slower than most other languages.

>>51412585
>Nobody wants Java on a[...] security system.
Is that why smartcards run Java?

okay let us see the code, I'm 100% sure you coded badly you fucking nigger