>hurr Java sucks is slow and much better alternatives exist

>>47318939
>using java when there is 300000 exploits out there

C

>>47318955
/thread

>>47318954

>Implying the exploits have anything to do with the language itself

"no"

>>47318939
>hurr AIDS sucks kills you slow and much better STDs exist

Any of them running on 3 billion people, lads?

>Any of them running on 3 billion devices, lads?
Of course, often the same devices. It's an all-inclusive world out there!

>>47318939
C

>>47318955
>>47319034
>meme language

>>47319034
>>47318955
>implying anyone volunteers to use that

if you have the choice you either use C#, C++ or simply no C variety whatsoever

C is deprecated by modern alternatives all software still running pure C at this point can be considered legacy software and a burden to maintain, operate and expand - complete rewrites to a better language should be considered

8 million retards can't be wrong!

>>47319150
>essentially assembly macros
>deprecated.

no.

>>47318939
3 billion devices with the ask toolbar.

>>47319449
My credit card chip has an ask toolbar?
Dammit I hate Oracle

>>47318939
>argumentum ad populum

I sure do love me some Windows

>>47319150
Is this a joke?

> Need to add rule to cisco fw.
> Hurrr you need java to launch asdm.

Full on retard.

>>47320131
It could be a joke.
It could be a genuine /g/ poster who actually believes the retarded shit he's saying because his experience outside of his basement is so limited he has no idea how ignorant he is.

File: 1398692715794.webm (3MB, 1270x720px)

3MB, 1270x720px

>>47318939

and there are some 5 billion people who have the Herpes virus. I would not recommend it based on this.

>>47318939
The reason it is slow is because people code in it like shit. Then they blame the language for their lack of ability to code in it.

>>47322789
yeah it's not the VM
kek

>>47322959
Well if you code like shit then their isn't much the VM can do to optimize. You have to know good coding practices from shitty ones. That goes for any language.

captcha: secks

>>47318939
Java is an okay language. Kindof and in-between of slow as fuck languages like python or ruby and fast ones like c

ARM assembly

>inb4 lots of stupid shit from india tier coders

>>47318939
yeah, 3 billion feature phones

>>47322158
sauce

>>47318939
the C language family is running on every single windows and Linux machine out there.

File: lang.rank_.plot_.q1152.png (127KB, 1250x838px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1250x838px

http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2015/01/14/language-rankings-1-15/

>Java takes the first two places

other languages, are you even trying?

>>47323203
literally googled the first few words of the quote...

>Billy Madison

>>47323253
you a dumb faggot

>Despite some naming, syntactic, and standard library similarities, JavaScript and Java are otherwise unrelated and have very different semantics

>>47323273
u mad, microsoft slave?

>>47323046
>java
>slower than C

kekek

>>47323253
>CSS is a programming language

File: blog-carlesmateo-com-performance-languages.png (39KB, 1101x753px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 1101x753px

>>47323296
forgot pic

http://blog.carlesmateo.com/2014/10/13/performance-of-several-languages/

>>47323296
>Java faster than C

Am I being baited?

wouldn't it be gnu+java as java isn't a machine in itself but rather a virtual machine running on top of the gnu tools and java in itself is kind of meaningless.

>>47323283
>microsoft slave
what? How in the world did you even get to that conclusion?

>>47323328
hahahahahahahahahhaha

>>47323312
>autist nitpicking

it's W3C/CSS and Lovelace/Programming language

>>47323329
still mad, kek

>>47323328
probably yes

>>47323322
On a single machine with a single CPU core, a C binary is obviously going to be faster. With multiple cores, it depends on the type of program and whether the C programmer has gone to the effort to implement multithreading or concurrency to match the Java program, not many do though as it is not only difficult but very error prone as the language has no support for threads.

C does not scale well. In an enterprise settings with a JVM running on top of middleware, it is not even a comparison.

>>47324142
>the language has no support for threads.
C11 has support for threads you fuck face.
At least learn the facts before you try to argue about it.

>>47323318
How about string performance. :^)

>>47323318
>ASM is slower than Java
Seems like someone wrote a fairly poor bit of assembly then eh?

>>47324208
>C11 has support for threads
O, I wasn't aware there was a new C standard. Either way, assuming both utilized multithreading/concurrency to an equal degree. The Java program still has a good chance of being faster than the C program on most systems as the JIT compiler is generating machine code for the exact machine upon it will be running upon.

>>47324667
except that every class is an object in java and memory allocation has to give every object its own address block. java can never be faster than c. it's inherently impossible due to how it handles everything as an object.

>>47318939
This is the most shocking thing i always see when i run the damn installer.
If it's really true then we're all fucked.
I also think that the rare glitch that the coke vending machine at my work mostly takes but don't add it up or detects it wrong is because it's sum 32bit embed system running sloppy java code.

>>47324237
What you're referring to as Asm, is in fact, Asm.js, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Asm plus JS.

>>47318939
Every device on Earth uses binary, whatcha gonna do about it? :^)

File: 1352393999819.jpg (5KB, 279x165px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 279x165px

>>47318939
>Parking Meters
>Credit Cards
What the fuck?

>>47324237
of course. compilers write bettler assembly than humans 99% of the time

>>47324717
that's why it consumes more memory than C if the C programmer is not retarded, but it still can be faster thanks to some godly JIT compiler that often generates better code than the C compiler is able to (because of "compile once, run anywhere"). not inherently impossible at all.

>>47325212
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Card