Let's all use .PNG since everyone's got fast broadband

>>47196418
no.
tiff master race.

File: ie-tan chibi.png (4MB, 3000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3000x4000px

There's nothing better than seeing artwork rendered losslessly in perfect PNG quality!

>>47196437
>tiff
>not .bmp

>>47196455
>.bmp
>not .raw

>>47196418
please dont i have hughesnet

File: anon is a faggot.png (809KB, 3000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

809KB, 3000x4000px

>>47196447
>not optimising your .pngs

File: 1427321421417.jpg (68KB, 420x450px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 420x450px

>>47196418
But Anon, smaller file sizes are better for low storage and bandwidth. Why would you want to use jpg?

>>47196418
I'd love to use high res images all the time with PNG, but 4cdn is so fucking slow.

File: fuckmylife.png (46KB, 709x60px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 709x60px

>>47196418
>since everyone's got fast broadband

seriously nigger

>>47196502
png: 23k
jpg: 68k
>But Anon, smaller file sizes are better for low storage and bandwidth. Why would you want to use jpg?

File: png vs jpg.png (152KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 800x1000px

Different format for different situations.

>>47196551
Yes and?
Are you repeating what I'm saying or just having trouble with reading comprehension?

>>47196501
may i ask what quantizer software you used?

i've been using pngnq but yours has even nicer dithering

>>47196466
>.raw
>not .everything_padded_with_1_TB_of_zeros

>>47196678
>not doing this with a squashfs partition

File: a.png (130KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 800x1000px

>>47196555

>>47196455
tiff is 16 bit.
bmp is only 8 bit pleb tier shit

>>47196466
>.raw
that doesn't exist.

Also, assuming you meant raw instead of .raw:
Unedited photographs look like shit.

File: 1427322389410.jpg (84KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 800x1000px

>>47196693
I have optimized your png

Into a superior jpg

>>47196447
svg is more perfect than png

>>47196660
i just used this website

https://tinypng.com/