>refuses to use closed source software >incredibly happy

If there's no good OSS alternative then what can you do

File: Girls.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>46741905
>OSS alternative
>good

Show me an entirely open source computer, from cpu and gpu to mouse and monitor

File: 1331656570482.jpg (89KB, 450x357px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 450x357px

>/g/
>incredibly happy

If you buy Intel you are supporting an enemy of free software.

>>46741929
IRC clients for example, all the good ones are OSS

>>46741939
I'd like to see JUST an open sourced monitor.
I doub't such a thing exists or is even feasible.

>>46741939

show me your hypocrisy, oh wait

>>46741879
I can hack open source software. I can't hack open source hardware because I do not own any chip fabs, so it doesn't matter to me.

>>46741966
It's p. feasible, but not in the way you're probably thinking

>>46741959
If you buy intel you're supporting ISIS as that's the company's CPU that was used to design the cameras that they use to film people burning.
Do you support terrorists, /g/?

>FX-8320
>280x
Close enough

>>46742009
Oh, and a gook monitor that lets you overclock

File: RMS.png (254KB, 768x864px) Image search: [Google]

254KB, 768x864px

>>46741939
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lemote#Netbook_computers

>>46742119
>The Yeeloong netbook computer is intended to be built on free software[4] from the BIOS upwards,
That's not open hardware.

>>46742212
How would one make open source hardware if you cannot even compile it to see if it really is what they say it is? The best a company can do is make it well documented and even then, since you cannot compile and test yourself, there is no way to tell if that is everything they are including.

>>46742230
Compiling in software is equivalent to building in hardware, you dipshit.

>>46741961
>god tier pieces of OSS
>not using emacs as the first example

>>46742240
No fucking shit, but it still wouldn't be opensource stupid nigger.

File: 1410522228614.jpg (23KB, 341x268px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 341x268px

>>46742212
What the fuck are you talking about faggot?

>>46741879
>be John Carmack
>like free software
>everything he writes is nonfree for years

>>46742230
Base it off a FPGA and provide Verilog

Or a RISC with microcode

>>46741879
There is no such thing as open source hardware as hardware is not made from source code idiot.

>looks down on people who dont overclock their cpu/gpu
>doesn't even overclock their monitor

/g/ logic

>>46742287
#rekt

File: alex.jpg (182KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 900x1350px

>>46741879
>incredibly happy

It's impossible to verify modern hardware, you can't just bust out a microscope and audit transistor placement, it's infeasible. so even if you could get a fab house to give you full schematics you could never verify it, save for like 1 in a 1000 chips made, if even that.

Just gotta trust em

>>46742274
His magnum opus is OSS

>>46742361
NOW it is

>>46741988
>I pick up a rock and claim it as mine
>someone else takes it from me and kills someone with it
>I am the murderer
LE reverse sarcasm'd

If OP wasn't retarded, he would of said hardware without adequate documentation which does not really matter, manufacturers can bullshit all they want with documentation but can't with source code.