There you go, you fucking neckbeards.
>not realizing that programs and applications have been developed with todays monitors in mind
>not realizing with sidebars and menus that widescreens are actually more useful than square screens
Why is /g/ full of luddites? If this was the 90's that monitor would be great. But guess what? Things change
Here's my perfect Eizo
>he acts like hes ever actually coded and had 2 editors up at the same time
If I had a screen like this, I'd want an option to adjust the black bars. With a screen like this, I'd rather they just eliminate the bottom bar entirely and leave the top part black when playing 16:9 content. Honestly though, I would consider it.
>B-b-but the framerate when I play 5 year old games and indieshit makes up for my shit colours!
>I also can't bear an extra 4ms of response time! I'm a pro gaymer don't you know?
Nah, fuck off with your poor colour, and terrible veiwing angles, and take the 16:9 aspect ratio with you.
It's so you can display longer documents/have multiple things open at once and you move your head slightly up and down instead of playing tetris with your windows all day you tard.
Shocking I know but some people actally WORK at a computer instead of passively looking at one for entertainment.
Not just videos, ANY 16:9 content. Like games for example. If this is your main desktop monitor, you'll end up doing some gaming on it, and how many games support 1920x1920? Probably only those that allow custom resolutions. You'll end up with 1920x1080 letterboxed or some horribly stretched mess. I honestly think it's a great idea though, I'd buy one just to try it out. This would probably be fucking incredible for reading manga.
>finally horizontal and vertical arcade games can be the same size
We already got pretty close a decade ago with 1280x1024. Only needed another fifth.
Viewing angles matter when you have more than 1 screen.
Also, TN viewing angles on a larger display are so fucking terrible that even when staring dead center at the thing the colors in the corners and on the sides are going to be off. Fucking terrible shit.
I do admit at 120Hz would be lovely, but then again at 2560x1440 or 2560x1600 you will not be able to maintain that sort of performance even with something like 2 980s in all games, so I'd rather stick to a solid 60FPS with much better colors and viewing angles that I enjoy no matter what I do instead of 120-144FPS in old games.
I dunno the full specifics but as far as I know, VA isn't as good as IPS with color accuracy, but is pretty close, and is far superior to TN in many aspects. The blacks in particular are good from what I've heard.
The only thing I miss about TN is the ability to actually see this shit.
So, anyone read the fuck link...
It's not for gaymer, it's not for designers.
So, don't need fast response, correct color, angle of view, and super-resolutions.
The motive of this is for "better suited to writers, coders or CAD who require many items on the screen at once, often side by side."
It is a mistake to include peripheral vision when trying to justify these sorts of decisions. Both the region of your view where stereopsis occurs, as well as the fovea are very nearly perfect circles.
why are all you neckbeards replying to this obvious shill thread?