Anonymous
480 Performance per Watt 2016-06-29 16:14:07 Post No.55320518
[Report] Image search: [Google]
480 Performance per Watt 2016-06-29 16:14:07 Post No.55320518
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: perfwatt_2560_1440.png (36KB, 500x930px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 500x930px
Kill me
37 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55320518
Closed the gap to last gen's nvidia stuff.
Still not as good as the new pascal, but good enough.
>>
>>55320552
God, even the 28nm Fury is better than this meme card...
>>
o wow, looking forward to buying one
Why can ONLY OSX do font rendering right?
51 Posts / 10 Images
View this topic
>>
Ubuntu has the same rendering right?
>>
>>55320504
Because Steve Jobs really cared about typography and Macs are heavily used in the design industry.
>>55320574
>Ubuntu
>>
>>55320574
freetype
File: web-browsers_1410408020.jpg (148KB, 800x800px) Image search:
[Google]
148KB, 800x800px
Is there another lite weight web browser besides Midori that isn't absolute shit?
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55320409
Lynxs
>>
lightweight means absolute shit.
>>
Vivaldi
Whew, the narrative sure changed, i wonder if google isnt paying the bloggers bills anymore
It went from
>GUISE CHROME IS THE BEST SHIT EVER! BETTER THAN HAVING A BLACK DICK IN YOUR ASS!
To
>THIS BROWSERS BLOWS ASS, HERE IS A GUIDE TO MAKE IT SUCK LESS
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55320407
No dude, it's about how to make something that is the fastest of all possible browsers even faster.
sage
>>
>>55320710
sure thing ;)
>>
>>55320407
I think when it came out it was competitively fast, but they have not put much effort into optimizing it over the years. They've also really let it bloat up with their app and extension infrastructure.
File: Kingston 120gb UV400 SSD.png (36KB, 397x332px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 397x332px
How fast or slow are your drives? SSD and HDDS welcomed.
10 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
File: wd blue laptop drive.png (33KB, 386x346px) Image search:
[Google]
33KB, 386x346px
>>55320270
Slow
>>
>>55320270
Slow ssd but better than a hdd.
>>
File: 950 Pro CystalDiskMark 5-20-16.png (483KB, 799x656px) Image search:
[Google]
483KB, 799x656px
decent i guess
File: simsen.jpg (36KB, 512x384px) Image search:
[Google]
36KB, 512x384px
For those of you who've learnt to touch type recently, what lessons did you follow? There are plenty of websites but I'd like to know what worked for some of you..
I type at a somewhat moderate speed, albeit incorrectly, and readjusting now feels very unnatural, especially that I'm much slower and fuck up a lot more.
21 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
MMORPGs
>>
>>55320220
can't tell if you mean keyboard shortcuts or
>buying girlfriend for 20 shekkles
>how do i becoem mod
>>
>>55320176
People take lessons for this?
Just use your keyboard a lot and then you kind of just learn it
is it safe?
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
fbi cracks it whenever they want.
no problem if you aren't committing a crime like reporting news as a journalist.
>>
>There are people still using 2000s era memes like Tor and TrueCrypt.
>2016 The yea of Coptic resurgence
>>
>>55320084
No, US gov owns the vast majority of nodes and if they have the entrance and exit the wntire point of tor goes out the window.
What mobo should I buy?
>am3
>will be running unlocked phenom 960t so 140W tdp? Fuck if I know
>need only 1 pcie, but at least 2 pci so none of that microscopic form factor crap
>had asus m4a87td previously, but bought it faulty for dirt cheap with 2 ram slots dead and I wanna download more ram
>usb3 is not a priority, but nice
>don't really care about nics or integrated soundcards, got my own
Should I just go and buy the same but functioning and scam someone with mine on ebay?
12 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Take the cheapest 970 chipset mobo you can get
>>
>>55319923
Forgot to add
>no gaymes, it's my daw pc
>ddr3, because I've already got 8 gigs of that
>>55319998
Why shouldn't I just stick with 870? Seems cheaper.
>>
File: 2008040241_1221831170.jpg (190KB, 800x636px) Image search:
[Google]
190KB, 800x636px
Bumpu
File: intel_xeon_lga[1].jpg (258KB, 990x887px) Image search:
[Google]
![intel_xeon_lga[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/zL4bFKj.jpg "intel xeon lga[1]")
258KB, 990x887px
>12 cores with hyperthreading (24 threads)
>encoding 1080p video, browsing youtube, watching a 4k video, opening and closing various programs, and shitposting at the same time
>everything still feels as responsive as if I wasn't doing anything at all
compare to
>quad core system with no hyperthreading
>trying to use an open browser and a couple of programs at once
>noticeable sluggishness
Fuck that shit. Anybody who tells you 4 cores are enough in 2016 is a cuck fool. I could probably play a game at the same time as all this other shit and it wouldn't be effected either. Moar cores may not affect performance in individual programs by themselves, but if you want to have a computer that never seems to slow down or strain you need at least 8 cores.
34 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
Get your phoney ass out of here, retard.
>>
I don't even know what you're trying to argue.
>>
>>55319939
x2
And you could build an even better system now. I got this last year before the big dump of e5-2670s started.
What is objectively the best music player for Linux?
pic not related
20 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55319841
cmus
>>
cat file.wav > /dev/dsp
or
ffmpeg -i file -u8 /dev/dsp
>>
>>55319841
moc
File: IMG_20150128_184555_283.jpg (961KB, 1840x3264px) Image search:
[Google]
961KB, 1840x3264px
kill yourself /g/ wwww
5 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55319827
>286
enjoy your >no gaems
>>
>VLSI
WHAT YEAR IS IT?
>>
>>55319827
what's with all those parallel connectors? what does this thing do?
Th (ID: !e.FaLconO6)
AMD RX 480 launch summary, thread #3 2016-06-29 15:28:24 Post No.55319729
[Report] Image search: [Google]
AMD RX 480 launch summary, thread #3 2016-06-29 15:28:24 Post No.55319729
[Report] Image search: [Google]
AMD RX 480 launch summary, thread #3
Th (ID: !e.FaLconO6)
2016-06-29 15:28:24
Post No. 55319729
[Report]
[View this topic]
The sources:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480/
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/RX_480_CrossFire/
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10446/the-amd-radeon-rx-480-preview
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-10,4616.html
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/93932-amd-radeon-rx-480-14nm-polaris/
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/7756/amd-radeon-rx-480-video-card-review-starting-rebellion-199/index.html
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/72889-radeon-rx480-8gb-performance-review-17.html
http://www.kitguru.net/components/graphic-cards/zardon/amd-radeon-rx-480-8gb-review/
http://www.gamersnexus.net/hwreviews/2496-amd-rx-480-8gb-review-and-benchmark-vs-gtx-970-1070
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-RX-480-Review-Polaris-Promise
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2016/06/29/amd_radeon_rx_480_video_card_review
Performance summary:
1- Tom's put this card as below the GTX 970 and R9 390, but not by much.
2- TechPowerUp, Anandtech, PC Perspective, Hexus, HardwareCanucks, and KitGuru put the card at slightly above the GTX 970 and R9 390.
3- LegitReviews, GamerNexus and HardOCP puts the card on par with the GTX 970 and R9 390.
Details:
1- All reviews mention that the cards does considerably better on DX12, where it can beat the GTX 980
2- The reviews praise the card's overall power consumption, but note that it exceeds the standard limits (86W from PCIe, instead of 75W)
3- Most lament the temps of the reference cooler.
4- Most of the reviews note that the reference cooler does well on the noise. As good as nVidia? No, but this is something to note, considering the horrible reference jet engines of AMD's 290/290X cards.
5- Overclocking results are mixed, some reviewers getting up to 10% OC, and some barely 2%.
Overall:
A good launch for AMD. The card is slightly above the GTX 970/R9 390, and cheaper. Once non-reference versions are out, with better temps, this should be a great purchase.
338 Posts / 44 Images
View this topic
>>
3rd party when?
>>
>>55319755
2 weeks
>>
>>55319755
Less than two months.
Theorically.
File: virtual[1].gif (22KB, 255x367px) Image search:
[Google]
![virtual[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/thY24gS.gif "virtual[1]")
22KB, 255x367px
Say I wanted to host my own website on my own server, but did not have a spare computer to make into a server, and did not want to use Gotitty.com for hosting.
Would I be able to run a virtual machine in linux/ubuntu from the computer I normally use, and assuming I set up everything correctly, connect to my website via the internet in any web browser out side of my virtual machine?
I.E, could I host it on a virtual machine on my computer, leave the house, go over to my friends house, and access the website hosted on my virtual machine via some sort of domain name on his web browser.
Anyone have experience with this? I googled it but my initial thought would be that it isn't possible, given that a Virtual Machine is well, virtual. But it seems that it might be possible based on one page that I read.
18 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>55319719
How stupid are you? No, seriously, OP. I cannot believe you googled shit.
Running a VM from your own computer, is perfectly doable if you have the RAM and CPU for it. Yes, you can access your virtual server from outside of the VM, google harder. Open up a port on your router, target the VM ip address and figure out the rest.
>>
keep reading kid
>>
>>55319946
Eyy dawg, I just wanted some more opinions before I wasted my time attempting something impossible.
File: WINAMP.png (14KB, 320x240px) Image search:
[Google]
14KB, 320x240px
Should I stop being a pleb and move on from winamp? I have been using it for decades, even the installer I keep on one of my pendrives is 10 years old.
If yes, which one?
59 Posts / 21 Images
View this topic
>>
musicbee
foobar
or just stick to winamp, no one gives a shit
>>>/sqt/
>>
>>55319701
C L E M E N T I N E
>>
>>55320166
clementine is ugly as cancer and takes up too much resources compared to musicbee and foobar
File: Screenshot_2016-06-29-11-13-14.png (234KB, 720x1280px) Image search:
[Google]
234KB, 720x1280px
The only "new" 2 games I plan on playing are MGSV and Overwatch, would a 8gb 480 be enough with the i5-6500?
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
rom the bench marks Ive seen, It is comparable to the 970 SSC. Everything was within a handful of frames between the two. I personally dont prefer the reference blowers and Im going to wait until non reference cards come out
>>
It'll be enough.
>>
>$199 for 8GB variant
holy fuck