Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 6921. page

>>56576634
1. Good idea. This is what our contractors from Romania did. Sometimes we'd use google hangouts but this was better because we didn't have to be near our computers to call them
2. No.
3. Nope.

>>56576634
1. Do it.
2. Everybody will assume you're a nigger.
3. Probably not because they're faggots too.

>>56576850
>>56576654
Just got a reply from a mate in CA and he told me that 424 is actually quite big, how would it be narrowed down to Compton then?

File: Sigmund_Freud_1926.jpg (434KB, 1598x1065px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 1598x1065px

>>56576612
Have you ever stopped to think about why you see nothing but big black cocks when looking at unrelated images, anon?

>>56576612
BLUE BOARD

>>56576612
CAN'T UNSEE

python 3

Go

Isn't that Go or Rust?

>>56575988
Really difficult.
There are a lot of difficulties that appear only in this style of programming.
First your language needs some kind of execution thread. Every thread has its own instruction that it's executing and it's doing that independently from all other threads. All threads can run simulatneously or one after the other or something in between.
There are several different ways to implement threads in a language.
The next thing is communication and synchronization. When threads are running independently, there needs to be a way for them to communicate through data.
There are several different ways to implement thread communication in a language.
With that you have concurrency. But it creates some problems.
It mostly comes down to the fact that there's no ordering on the instructions. First, as a programmer you actually have to identify, which parts of your program can be executed independently, which can get very tricky. You can create threads that do struff independently, but the threads can execute in any order. They can access and manipulate shared data in any order, if the synchronization is wrong. Or they get into a deadlock, because of bad synchronization. And it's very easy to get this wrong. It might even be that sometimes everything goes well, and sometimes your program crashes, simply because you can't predict in which order your program executes. This makes debugging more difficult.
Concurrency also creates some new possibilities though. It's a new and different way to structure your program and through simultaneous execution of threads you get a speedup, but you have to take care of the issues that come with it.

>>56575988
>How difficult is it to program for more processor threads?
Ever tried to do it? It's incredibly difficult. You basically have to think, for every single line of code in the program, "Okay, what might go wrong if at this exact moment in execution, some other thread changed something?" Finding race conditions and minimizing the amount of locking you have to do is brain-twisting work.

This is after you restructure all your algorithms to break work up into bits that can run in parallel. For some problems there's just no way to do that.

>>56575988
The first issue is that not many workloads can be parallelized. Even if a workload can be parallelized, it doesn't mean that it can benefit from it, and it might even slow down if the threads spent much time waiting.

>you have to open config files to change colors
>no concise desktop environment
>thousands of distros
>video rendering
>video games
>marxist GPL
None of these are a bad thing

>>56575950
>>you have to open config files to change colors
This is an X11 software made by autists problem. Don't tell me BSD doesn't have urxvt. Don't tell me BSD users don't PREFER urxvt.
>no concise desktop environment
Same problem on BSD
>thousands of distros
Dozens of BSDs
>bugs bugs bugs bugs
lol, basically anything but openBSD
>video rendering
worse on BSD
>video games
worse on BSD
>screen tearing
BSD is X11 only, no wayland
>social justice policy
A lot of SJW-infested projects are cross platform, so BSD has this problem too
>marxist GPL
As opposed to the BSD license which fails to rebel against the tyranny of IP law. I can take BSD source and make a binary that you can go to jail for hacking. You can be free without the source, it's just harder to be free, but the BSD doesn't ensure any sort of freedom. In a society where property rights are confiscated in the name of corporate profits, it has to, and I wish we could have true protection of our property rights in software without marxist "gib means of production pls" bullshit put forth by selfish "hacker" types.

>i dun wanna rely on noone but mahself cuz i got no money and no social skills -gnutard

Are you actually retarded enough to think that BSD doesn't have more than one desktop?

I'm not even going to address the rest of your retarded post because it's probably just as retarded as the one that I picked out, but you're aware that you can install a plethora of DEs (and WMs!) on BSD right you fucking idiot?

>>56575907
>1180

>>56575907
can't the titan XP handle 4K/60 in quite a few games

i'm pretty sure it does in gta v

Can we start banning the users who post these threads? They really belong on /v/ or /vg/.

>>56575774
At least it isn't giving you an frowning emoticon.

>>56575774
Where have you been since Windows 10 got released?

>>56575774
Hate to defined windows desu but once the automatically restarts windows shows the variable that crashed it located at the bottom left corner

>>56575738
ZFS with mirror vdevs
btrfs RAID 6 would be literally perfect for the hobbyist data-hoarder, if only it, y'know, worked properly

Weekly backups

>>56575781
>ZFS with mirror vdevs
this, it just works

>>56575685
You probably want low esr. They are so cheap its not going to make any price difference. Get Panasonic or Nippon chemicon brand caps.

Actually look up the data sheet for the caps you are replacing and get ones with the same specs.

>>56575777
Check em

Along as she knows what she is doing you have nothing to worry about.

>>56575593
Did you even read the second line?

>>56575593
It's a woman. You really think there's any chance that she'll know what she is doing?

I'm buying a pair when they come out.

Apple removed headphone plus from iPhones. Apple owns the biggest wireless headphone company. I can only wonder what motivated this change.

>>56575522
I for one can't wait to get my ear cock'n'balls. I just can't wait for the big, muscular Apple company to fill my ear holes.

File: 1472316773775.gif (2MB, 425x550px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 425x550px

>Next ipod shuffle version
>Removes the jack, takes Airpods
>Wirelessly charged
>Data transfer through Bluetooth

I can only get so hard. Imagine just having a tiny shuffle in your pocket and being able to wirelessly control it from your headphones, kind of like the old voice-only Shuffle.

>>56575651
that would actually be pretty neat

a little thing clipped like a button to your bag or whatever. truely wireless/

it almost makes this whole shitfest feel a little better because THAT would be the future, not the iphone shit

>>56575651
Why not build it all into the headphones

>>56575431
don't

>>56575445
Don't what?

>>56575431
Watch the s2e1 episode of Black Mirror op

Both are legacy. Get DisplayPort

>>56575193
DisplayPort for everything, HDMI is only acceptable for multimedia equipment and VGA for legacy equipment.

>>56575193
Yes.

>>56575187

Still crying over my inability to make angular work as per >>56573147

>>56575211
What the fuck is angular?

>>56575236

How are you this out of touch? It's the most used front-end framework since jQuery.