Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 6304. page

Yup the dream of gbit is over. Now waiting for 10gbe

>>57252739
Space exploration. Literally had the moon in the 1970s and now all we do is go in circles.

Graphene

>>57252735
>just do it node javascript
>node javascript
>node

This is bait, right? No one would use node javascript when they have perl.

>>57252749
I never learned pearl

look up python

>smartwatches
in other news, vr headsets arent catching on

>letting a woman turn your company, the biggest company on earth, into a fashion company

yep, apple is finished. theyre not innovating on anything that matters anymore.

>>57252712
I got an Apple watch after it launched through work and used it as a fashion accessory. I used the status, the fashion part, but the watch during launch was a terrible product. It looked decent, almost like a proper watch by an actual proper designer, but I could lift on the hype and use it as "something different".
For the second Watch they keep marketing it as a fitness accessory. We have better brands for that, and since I already keep healthy and fit through better means, that is useless to me. Then I'd use it for exercise, but I'd look like a weirdo wearing an expensive watch alongside a $20 sports top, $10 sports bra and $15 sports pants. I know shoes are expensive, but a device only targeted at fitness that lasts but two years and has to be charged before every workout session (in my case daily except Sunday), and costs triple the amount of shoes that last a year and are actually useful, that's just not something to cough up for those who don't get it for free.
What Apple needs is Steve Jobs. Sadly, he's dead. Samsung is still doing well, as they've always been independent of Steve Jobs. I like Tim Cook, but I don't like the shitty products Apple ships nowadays. Seriously, a mouse that has to be charged from the bottom?

spend 200-500€

>>57252496
That's a decent one for the price. I have the cheaper one with the lower back.

The cheap artificial leather on 100$ chairs will come off after like two years and it will be absolutely everywhere in your home.

>>57252467
what website is that opie?

>>57252486
coursera.org

CS50X

Following https://github.com/open-source-society/computer-science#introduction-to-computer-science to get the basics down.

Chrome

It's the only option for non autistic users who want to be productive

Chromium is literally the best browser on Linux. What happened to browsers? There used to be actual competition between them.

>>57252399
No, all browsers are shit.
Most of them for different reasons though.

There is literally nothing wrong with it.
And besides firing that one trump support Mozilla is the least cucked company.
proofs me wrong.

Make memory usage not shit
Make it run as well as other browsers
Stop appealing to normies and women

>>57252417
women and children all use chrome. Only really l33t cool people use firefox

>>57252360
It's really fast and really expensive and can get really hot

>>57252360
It's pretty good, not worth it for 99% of people though

>>57252360
M.2 is only good for running your os
If you want speed and size go intel ...but it will cost ya

Centris 610

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIRv9H-9L4k

Apple //e + HDD controller and memory expansion

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLqTSUI-NdU

Macintosh Classic II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tT22nWCSH9U

Something doesn't get shit om a specific version number
but at an age of 1 year

http://semver.org/

>>57252294
>2.9 < 2.10
for what purpose

Also forgot
previous: >>57246428

>>57252068
xkcd is worse

>>57252130
the internet is a big place. you can go literally anywhere if you're being triggered. this isn't a safe space

That's not true.

>>57251961
It is.
One of my throwaway accounts got locked because of (((unusual activity)))

>>57252003
There is no way to know if the unusual activity is attributable to you not providing a phone number.

it has never even worked for me

Technology

>>57251851
>not buying a 4chan pass
It's like you want to give to the botnet

File: 125176753.jpg (5KB, 127x170px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 127x170px

>>57251797
>28" 3:2 active digitizer screen
Say no more.

>>57251836
I would buy the display if it didn't come with all that overpriced mediocrity attached

>>57251797

Genuinely, I love the idea. I wouldn't mind spending the money for it, if I had a usecase that wasn't just >fucking around in photoshop making retarded ass edits of dumb shit my friends say and do
I AM surprised they're not running the newer Pascal hardware in it, though. That's a genuine surprise to me. Big performance leap, big decrease in power draw, and a bigger selling feature than "We've got high-end mobile graphics from last year embedded!"

... and worth every penny.

>>57251860
seriously. you can't get that sort of display anywhere else. just 4K and touchscreen is unheard of at that size, but add in a digitizer and DCI-P3? Now we just need them to sell the display only.

that's nothing for me because i'm rich. and if you get a mac you will be rich too, because it works both ways.