Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 4570. page

I know right? I've got mine connected to my router without a monitor and it streams games to my linux desktop just fine. No idea what all the fuss is about.

>>58759258
Fuck off aussie shill.

File: freetard.jpg (35KB, 500x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 500x400px

>tfw to dumb to use Windows 10

File: ibuynothingnewfeb2017.jpg (811KB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

811KB, 3000x2000px

>>58758013
fURST!
Love it 7.5/10

>>58758013
Please put bst in the subject so I can filter this

>>58758051

it is

File: IMG_20170201_203644.jpg (2MB, 2857x3137px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2857x3137px

Oh, hi.

File: n2ewguts.jpg (1MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1280px

Nice guts, my man.

>is it good to learn how to cast plastic if you're going to build shit with lego?

Good? "Yes". Completely needless? Yes.

>>58757313
>electrician
implying they could learn programming... kek

File: dea70b940d28a69bc7410d4ffbf60849555a99ec304c020da3d4703c5a6fbdd7_1.jpg (97KB, 751x820px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 751x820px

Don't listen to the tards in the thread. If you know assembly/basic you can put that knowledge into electronics building. Try playing shenzen I/O, it's semi-realistic. Also you can program arduinos to do cool shit if you feel like interacting with the material world.

File: deathadder_chroma_gallery_5.png (238KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 800x600px

debatable

>>58754176
>>>/v/

>>58754137
Truth!

>>58753028
Actually give a shit about what I'm working on.

Music
Makes me wanna get up and do shit

>>58753028
Drive and obsession for reaching a goal. That comes when you work on something you like and enjoy. Most people tend to follow lucrative trends in programming instead of following their own path. This applies to all fields in general.

File: air_gallery_01[1].jpg (118KB, 921x1080px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 921x1080px

Gently reminder Citizen Satellite Wave Air has better technology than Casio's G-Shock Radio Controled watches.

>>58749410
>$500 for a Casio
Oy vey

File: seagull_by_night.png (476KB, 507x902px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 507x902px

2nd for Seagull 1963

>>58743181
congrats
for me it's the imac, the best personal computer

>>58743202
Yeah? What do you like about it?

I'm seriously digging the battery life on this damn thing. 12 fucking hours? What the fuck.

File: chicago-laptop-mac-apple-trackpad-repair.jpg (42KB, 660x495px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 660x495px

>>58743299

I bought a thinkpad after owning a macbook and I laugh my ass off at how gullible I was. Those autistic faggots don't know what they are missing. The apple trackpad tosses the salad of every other laptop.

dear web people,

i am currently trying to get a certain table layout to work.
i NEED my code to be semantically correct, but i also NEED a specific design.

i want to display a table that has the following headers and respective contents: name, address, mail, phone AND items.
every cell is a link that will be styled to display:block. the link MUST "stretch", the whole cell HAS to be clickable.

the items-column MAY contain several infos for each row, these are generated dynamically.
they also HAVE to be style as a block.

however, i cannot specify any widths or heights to absolute numbers.

what i did so far

<style>
table { width:100%; }
a { display:block; padding:1em; }
</style>

<table>
  <tr>
    <th>name</th>
    <th>address</th>
    <th>mail</th>
    <th>phone</th>
    <th>items</th>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a>Adolf</a></td>
    <td><a>Deutsches Reich</a></td>
    <td><a>[email protected]</a></td>
    <td><a>66666</a></td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><a>Reichskanzler</a></li>
        <li><a>Fuehrer</a></li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td><a>Oppenheimer</a></td>
    <td><a>Los Alamos</a></td>
    <td><a>[email protected]</a></td>
    <td><a>800-GET-A-NUKE</a></td>
    <td>
      <ul>
        <li><a>Hiroshima</a></li>
        <li><a>Nagasaki</a></li>
      </ul>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

the problem is that links within ul li, as they are styled as block, will trigger a linebreak.
how can i stretch the single links within td? actually: how i can i stretch the clickable background of the links?

i dont want to use rowspan as that would mean counting each li, adding trs and then the rowspan attribute to the cells.
i really don't like that solution and i think that it is wrong as the items in the list are very closely related to the row they are in.

is there any JS free solution?
am i blind? is this easy?
should i us a different markup as this is semantically incorrect?
maybe nested lists?

>>58734358
I just woke up and your question is too long.

We generally have a short attention-span here. Post a codepen, simplify, and I'll look at it.

File: 26gsvPhoBYGuA9qso.gif (2MB, 480x338px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x338px

Tips to increase ad visibility?

please respond

I don't even know what you're saying. Stop being a faggot dude.

get 6700k Kaby Lake has shit temps and performance gain and Skylake is cheaper now.

Literally no reason to upgrade to Kaby Lake when Skylake is still relevant

Ask the FBI, they seem to be the only one who knows how.

>>58773705
give it back, l'quisha

>>58773705
Ask the police

> I've looked at MIT Open Courseware but that seems astoundingly dense
perhaps because you're astoundingly dense

>>58773612
If it's the best way forward I'll do it. I'm looking to see if there are alternatives.

>>58773660
you can bone up on the prerequisites (calc and set theory) at Khan Academy
https://www.khanacademy.org/math

I don't

>>58773545
I already made folders before hand.

>ex. Meme folders, vidyas, porn, etc.

>>58773592
Do you organize your images you get from 4chan? Like reaction images?

pls help

Google "microcode". CPUs are shitty so sometimes their microcode needs updates to work around hardware bugs.

>>58773631
thanks!

>>58772932
Not really.

Although you are an idiot if you don't OC that k series chip.

Nah. I have a 4790k since the day it was released and I feel like it can be relevant for 10 years. It's extremely hard to shrink the transistor nowadays so we see like +1/2% differences per year.

GPUs only give the delusion of progress because they work easily in parallel. Add more cores, more speed. That is why they are more and more expensive. They order bigger and harder to make dies.

What did you upgraded from? a i5? Matters little anyway. We're talking about the best you could get is like ~5% difference with a new equivalent.

>>58772932
I have an 4790k overclocked to 4.6GHz all cores, I don't see myself upgrading in 5-10 years unless octo-cores become really cheap and hit 5GHz all cores if OCed.
All you really need is an SSD to use as a scratch disk for shit like Photoshop.