Is there a way to upload downloads to a cloud storage website without having to have the file on your computer to upload?
something like
>right click
>save to cloud
instead of downloading it, it uploads to a cloud storage.
>>59144495
Do you want it to do your laundry and jack you off too?
>>59144528
hell yes.
Not without support from the original host of the file, otherwise you are going to have to cache the file first at the very least
>http://www.tweaktown.com/news/56440/intel-rocked-core-over-ryzen-price-drops-begin/index.html
>Intel just drop price on CPUs
>suddenly they have price/performance parity
>all that work AMD put in for nothing
sorry amd fags, welcome to the real world
>2017
>not supporting the reason for the price drops
>meanwhile this was a ploy by AMD to see how low Intel was willing to lower prices, and then undercut them with the R5 and R3
Sorry Pajeet, we're playing 4 dimensional chess now.
>>59144420
>http://www.tweaktown.com/news/56440/intel-rocked-core-over-ryzen-price-drops-begin/index.html
>microcenter
>IN-STORE PICKUP ONLY!
So almost everyone is stuck with this?
https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819117726
>guy discovers 0-day exploit in IE and Edge
>Google notifies Microsoft
>being a good sport give Microsoft 90 days (NINETY) to fix it
>Microsoft decides the time is better spent with cocaine and hookers paid for with the income from their newly gained botnet adware features
>90 days later
>still not fixed
>Microsoft users don't care
>because muh games and """AutoCAD""" über alles
You can't make this up :^)
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/17/02/26/2119246/google-discloses-yet-another-new-unpatched-microsoft-vulnerability-in-edgeie
Note that if the Linux kernel, Chromium or Mozilla took 90 days to fix a remote exploitable vulnerability, the world would be on fire.
Nobody as much as shrugs anymore because this is the modus operandi for Microsoft.
>>59144311
Who cares? Nobody even uses IE or Edge besides old people waiting to get hacked.
>>59144351
>>59144311
they dont need i.e. exploits, just spent an hour uninstalling millions of adware programs on a relatives computer because rejeev called from microsoft india warning them they had a wirus installed and they fell for it
Why is it so hard to get a keyboard with anti-ghosting/NKRO that doesn't:
1. look like riced out gayman shit
or
2. cost a lot because it has memechanical switches
?
>>59144251
I just want a keyboard that looks like this, costs under $20-30 and can handle more than 4 key presses at once.
Is that really too much to ask? Does NKRO cost a lot to implement or something?
>>59144251
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B01DBJTZU2/
Have fun.
>>59144291
>blue mech switches
>per CORE voltage modification
>can disable individual cores
>can OC individual cores, all cores
>alternatively, can undervolt certain cores while keeping others high, akin to big.Little without the clustering
>OC profiles under a keybind, can switch to all/single/multiple core OC with a button
>doesn't need restart
There hasn't been a more interesting OCing tool in ages, finally some granularity ever since everything got dumbed down after FSB was there.
The only drawback is that it's Windows only for now and only enabled after booting up the OS, if you're just gonna do a all core OC then the old BIOS method is gonna be better.
>max 6375MHz
Whoa
Probably a single core on LN2
>>59144242
That's not per core voltage, read the label on each voltage slider. A few retards are going to miss that and fry their chips though, kek.
>>59144300
Mhmm, good point, still it seems trivial to set up a profile with disabled cores and higher OCd cores for older games if you need ST that much
yo /g/, what's a faster and more stable alternative to firefox?
>>59144135
google chrome
Chrome. There's a reason it has like 130% market share.
>>59144135
Firefox without a billion addons installed.
>DAT bezels
>DAT shitty colors
>moto g2 looks much superior
>prices same as Nokia 5 & Samsung J5
It is lenovo niow.
It's complete garbage. Do not buy. Abandon ship.
>>59144084
>>59144125
actually it costs the same as a Nokia 6 & that phone is almost flagship tier
>>59144125
This
That's the reason it doesn't look close to phones from when it was an independent or backed up by google company, from now on it will all be just generic chinesse crap
Who here is waiting for Ryzen II on AM4+?
I'm squeezing out performance from my i7 950 until then yeah
>>59144058
Not me. I need new pc asap. I might buy it in the future though with new laptop.
>>59144058
I'm waiting for $150 OLED 8K monitors and photonic CPU Intel i7 22000K or AMD k45 series.
My friend is upgrading his rig and I said he would let me buy his old parts, how much should I pay for an i5-2500k with and asus p8p67 pro motherboard and 8GB of random ddr3 ram?
250usd
>rig
>>59143930
is that what the inside of the lid looks like?
As all of you should know by now, there are servers that are required to hold identifying information on users for two or many years.
What can be done to bloat out this legal requirement of theirs so that the cost of retaining said information is not financially viable.
I ask this because the biggest motivator to law makers is CEO's and bottom lines. Not the will of the people.
One thing I have taken to is making several google accounts and cramming as much data into the storage allocated. And am tempted to do the same to YouTube.
This of course is not applicable to all services, but there much be ways to increase your digital foot print exponentially to a point that it's no longer of value.
Thoughts /g/?
Oh, I forgot to mention. I'm a 7'6" half black half Indian, does anyone know how to hack an iPhone?
No anime posts please, this is /g not /a.
P.S. AMD IS FINISHED DONE BTFO!!!!
xDDDDDDDD
-muh dick
This place went to shit in a hand basket.
lol fight the power man
As a legalbro I'd say the bigger your digital footprint is, the more they can hold against you. Regardless if it's nonsense or not.
>Le I only need 100% multiprocessing le meme
Serial performance will be always required on interactive applications.
Unless you never actual sit on a computer and only encode x265.
Layman people have the delusion it's a matter of progress.
It's not a matter of progress, it's a mathematical fact you will always require serial performance on CPUs.
This is because interactive application must always adhere to the rules of a global loop and that must always be protected with inefficient locks in contrast to purely non-interactive rendering.
You can ask all you want for your next game to be "100% multiprocessed" but it will never happen.
It's how mathematics works.
You will always need strong threads not only in gaming, but in anything that requires human input, including setting up your Photoshop before you actually render, which is 99% of the time you actually use a computer
are you upset that nobody has replied to your bait thread?
>>59143833
not sure if you're stupid or very stupid or just incredibly smart.
>>59143776
PS. I bet most games or most interactive applications can't go above 10% or 20% max parallelization. On that graph 10% is almost nothing. 20% is also almost nothing.
> Reviews show the performance is good
> Uses more power then competitors and has less overclocking potential
> Intel uses power consumption to trick people into buying their CPUs
> Afew years later people realize that they should have gone AMD when their intels age like milk
Is this going to be the new 290X /g/?
>>59143689
Yippers
>>59143689
290X was a piece of shit card. constantly ran hot and sounded like a jet engine. First and last time i buy AMD. I'm sitting happily with my GTX 970.
>>59143758
>talks shit about the 290x
>proceeds to praise the GTX 970
Not sure if bait.
Jesus Christ, how can anyone support this company?
>>59143653
It's not about support
It's about irrational attachment
>>59143653
>My CPU is the shitter and it's not AMD's fault
Low paid shill GTFO
>>59143653
I remember back in early 00s AMD being better than P4 and yet everyone had intel cpu in their pc. I didn't understand how lower clocked athlon could beat p4 and my parents fell for p4 meme.
Made SPA in ASP .NET MVC using VS template.
Me be like: "Woa technology!"
>showdown
I bet you use celesteela, faggot. Also nice blog
>>59143550
>asp
>.net
>visual studio
kys kid
and then you wonder why a Pahjeet steals your job
>>59143728
Kys(anon);
Who here is using ZOrin OS 12? I have to say, it's way more stable than and nicer looking than the previous version.
>nicer looking
I cant even begin to think what the previous version looked like if that trainwreck you posted is an "improvement"
>>59143554
Show me your desktop.
>>59143567
Why?