His channel is really bad lately what's up with that?
How is it bad?
>>59216792
>nigger
>e/celeb
>>59216792
He's a nigger
GNU/Linux is a bit like the Micronesia football team.
It'll do the task you want, but horrifically bad.
>>59216762
No games, what a piece of shit.
>>59216762
> It'll do the task you want, but horrifically bad.
In reality, it does almost everything the world needs doing, and it does so in widespread production.
Only a fraction of Games and a subset of shitty art production depend on Windows / OSX.
What do the Commoners see in football?
Watching grown men chase a ball for 90 minutes, while you ingest ethyl alcohol and lay on your couch?
For what purpose?
so who's going to be getting those 1080s with the new memory
>spending 500$ on gpu
>for 3% better performance
>>>/v/
>>59216739
Nope. 290X/260X is what I'll be sticking with until a better deal comes along.
>>59216739
not me.
If they would have quit dragging their feet back in January.. hell even if maybe they simply didnt give the fag the stream after ces and let an employee talk shit to the customers then I might buy it now.
But now, they let an employee talk shit to everyone, so fuck nvidia.
How would the internet be affected by a nuclear attack?
I've been reading pic related, and its really good but also 40 years out of date, so it doesnt mention the internet at all.
Some example attacks:
Large Attack:
>2000 bombs aimed at 400 targets with a 20,000MT total yield
Small Attack:
>500 bombs aimed at 150 targets with a 1500MT total yield
I dunno what you expect
Servers would be destroyed disabling some websites and services but apart from that people would still be posting online about it
>>59216725
In the "large attack", the 53 largest metropolitan areas of the US would be levelled.
how would that affect internet infrastructure?
>>59216764
Nearly all us sites would be unavailable
The rest would be fine I guess unless the ocean cables cut off places
Inventor of the Li-Ion Battery, age 94, creates breakthrough solid-state battery, noncombustible and holds 3X charge
>coming to your smartphone never
https://fossbytes.com/goodenough-solid-state-battery-glass-electrolyte/
>monthly new breakthrough battery tech announcement
Yawn
>>59216596
Do you remember how awful batteries were only 15 years ago?
>>59216605
You mean about the same as today?
I've got some old tech from 10+ years ago with lions that are similar capacity to ones now and lasted a similar time between chargss
How can the market ever recover? Their stock are all literally dropping faster than lead
tech bubble finally bursting, good riddance
>>59216548
God damn, you clearly have never made an investment in your life.
/g/'s desperate struggle to understand how the stock market works has been my favourite part of the Ryzen launch.
What's the most powerful 2-core CPU that money can buy? Yes I'm looking for something specialized. Anything more than 3 cores is a waste of space.
Two single core systems beowulf'd together.
Intel i3 cpu's
>>59218058
this
The AMD Ryzen R7 series CPU is meant to go up against Intel's 8/10 core CPUs. In that regard, it completely destroys them on both price and performance.
It is not meant to compete directly against their 4 core CPUs. Just the fact that it indirectly competes with a CPU that it was never targeted at in the first place, before the bugs have even been shaken out, should tell you just how much deep shit Intel is in.
When the R5 and R3 comes out and directly targets the rest of Intel's lineup, you're gonna see some serious shit. Ryzen is just beginning to shake things up.
Also, if I see one more GAYMAN benchmark that shows 100 FPS vs 120 FPS at 1080p (which nobody with a high end CPU/GPU would even bother to run at) as some huge loss, I'm going to be sick.
>>59216478
>The AMD Ryzen R7 series CPU is meant to go up against Intel's 8/10 core CPUs. In that regard, it completely destroys them on both price and performance.
Funny, that's not what 99% of /g/ was saying last week. :^)
my gaming
Lets just ignore that it gets close to a $1700 10 core CPU.
Please don't post Amada while arguing.
Amada is for cuteposting.
So is uBlock Origin still the best or has anything changed?
Yes, but you might want to look into Ad Naueseum
I prefer AdGuard over uHide Origin
>>59216416
uBlock Origin
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/
uMatrix
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/umatrix/
And MVPS hosts system-wide
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
Should block pretty much everything.
Anyone else have severe crippling autism as bad as me?
>I can't afford the GTX 1080, but I don't want to buy the 1070 because it's an odd number.
The 1060 is too weak.
You're a lost soul, OP.
>>59216370
Also, the amount of disk space left on my drives has to end in 5.
If it doesn't, I find things to either delete or fill it up with.
If it's not like this I feel physical pain and start to get anxiety.
>>59216357
take a loan from your best friend.
>Intel can't into 4k gaymer
>can't into power consumption
>can't into multi-threading
>Intelfags have degraded to defending 800x600 gaming
How can kikes ever recover?
Remember to buy a $500 CPU to game at 640x480 because that's the PROPER way to test a CPU and not in the few hundred CPU benchmarks out there.
640x480 is the real world, not 4k.
I wonder why 4k benchmarks have been suspicously gone from reviewers, must have nothing to do with Intel.
Human eye can't see higher than 720p anyway
>visit ANY site but imageboards
>everyone agrees: ryzen is the best price/performance cpu for either gaming or working
>visit /g/
>it's don't
>it's don't
its is tho...
who cares what people say? all that matters is what is true. on /g/ we have some degree of freedom to banter with each other and post pics and that's all that matters. draw your own conclusions.
as far as I'm concerned, the best value for gaming is the 7700k and the best value in new CPUs is the ryzen 1700
>>59216337
They do think it's be like it is, but it's don't.
Thoughts on the new history viewer?
The interface felt so slow the last time I used it. Other than that, it's basically a chrome reskin.
What the fuck is Vivaldi and why should I care?
Is anyone in scientific/engineering computing actually using Julia in production? What is the state of industry uptake? Is it worth my time to learn if I can already Fortran, Matlab, and Python may way through anything I need?
>>59216154
During last year's ECMI modelling week there was one project that used it. It could replace Matlab some day if it grows the same quality of software suite.
>>59216177
Jupyter Zeppelin Beaker etc (one or multiple of them) and all their more common languages already do this. There is no opening.
>>59216207
The Julia debts make some pretty bold performance statements on their website. Are they blowing smoke or is Julia really as fast as C and Fortran?
Now that the dust has settled, what is /g/'s definitive opinion on Ryzen?
Hope they sort out their shit in time for R5 and R3
The dust has not settled yet faggot: https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/5x4hxu/we_are_amd_creators_of_athlon_radeon_and_other/def5h1b/
>>59216059
core for core, thread for thread, intel is better albeit more expensive.
if you're a gaymer, get intel
if money isn't an issue, get intel
if you're poor, get amd.
so nothings changed pretty much.