File: FB_IMG_1482391240057.jpg (27KB, 720x723px) Image search:
[Google]
27KB, 720x723px
Hey guys have an issue with a PC I built about a year ago, two days ago it got BSOD while installing fallout New Vegas. I've system restored it and factory reset it and reinstalled the graphics drivers off of USB drive. Got it working ok installed fallout again played it for a while, turned it off, come back to it and bam BSOD again. It's really got me stumped as to why it keeps getting this error, it's currently working atm, any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Pic unrelated.
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
Install solus
>>
>>59227263
Is your bios being reset when you turn your pc off?
This could be happening due to a dead battery.
>>
>>59227263
Read the error code and google next time
File: screenshot.jpg (12KB, 248x126px) Image search:
[Google]
12KB, 248x126px
update out!
https://www.fosshub.com/qBittorrent.html/qbittorrent_3.3.11_x64_setup.exe
6 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
so?
>>
>>59226975
Check the catalog before making a thread next time, retard.
>>
>stalled
Anonymous
System not turning on. 2017-03-04 02:05:15 Post No.59226940
[Report] Image search: [Google]
System not turning on. 2017-03-04 02:05:15 Post No.59226940
[Report] Image search: [Google]
File: 20170303_204910.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search:
[Google]
4MB, 4032x3024px
I recently built a pc and tried it out to see if everything was put together well. Without the hdd though. It hasn't arrived yet. Every thing seems to be in place but when I turned it in all I got was the fans twitching for a second and then turning off.
Motherboard: msi 970a-g43 plus
Psu: evga 500 w
Graphics card: geforce gtx 1060
Ram: hyperx 8gb
Fans: 2 corsair quiet edition
Processor: and fx-8350
11 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
Pic related? Cuz I don't see shit plugged in.
Anyway try a different dimm slot for the ram, since you only have 1 stick it's hard to ISO test for a faulty stick.
>>
Make sure RAM is in and all fans are plugged in, dumbass
>>
>>59226940
Shitty b8
your CPU and it's fan isn't plugged in, nor is your GPU, nor are any of your system fans like literlaly fucking nothing is plugged in holy ufkci jgj;g
File: photo (1).jpg (132KB, 900x900px) Image search:
[Google]
132KB, 900x900px
Live streaming now
https://youtu.be/I5mGFDAusOs
81 Posts / 7 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226884
>Ubuntu
Cuck detected.
>>
CIA are fucking with my internet. They're constantly disconnecting me.
>>
>>59226955
It works you dumb archnigger
File: bpZXAXlS.jpg (18KB, 400x400px) Image search:
[Google]
18KB, 400x400px
Is 2k a noticeable upgrade from 1080p? Or is it just a half-measure and you'd be better off getting 4k? I ask because with the 1080ti coming out I'm thinking of upgrading to a 2k 144hz monitor and I think the 1080ti is more than capable of handing it, I'm hesitant about going to 4k because I've grown really accustomed to 125fps+ on my current 1080p 144hz monitor. But if the resolution isn't that much more noticeable then I won't bother.
13 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
2560x1440p is a sweet spot for 27"
Yes it's a noticeable upgrade in image clarity from 1080p.
4K is overkill for 27" unless you have perfect vision and sit close to the monitor. Even then windows 10 DPI scaling is kinda ass, whereas 100% dpi scaling @ 27" 1440p feels just right.
>>
For work, higher res = amazing. For games, I don't think it really matters. I'd rather play at max settings on a high-end 60" 1080p television than on med-high on a 4k monitor or something like that. It's kind of a toss up. I don't think 4k really matters for TVs and I don't think higher res but lower settings is superior to 1080p at max settings in most cases.
But, like I said, if you're using it for work or just general stuff, it's amazing. Never going back to 1080 for desktop/laptop use.
>>
>>59226848
I do tend to sit closer and I currently have a 27" 1080p, I had a 34" tv up there before I built my rig and found it was too big, and 27 is the sweet spot for me if that is the sweet spot for 1440p I think I might invest.
File: 1421894933750.jpg (85KB, 640x683px) Image search:
[Google]
85KB, 640x683px
What's the best image viewing software for Ubuntu? The default is gross. The best image viewing software I've used is JPEGView for Windows, is there anything comparable for Linux?
14 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
File: 1482845893851.jpg (839KB, 2272x1704px) Image search:
[Google]
839KB, 2272x1704px
>>59226721
I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I've recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX.
Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called "Linux", and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project.
There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine's resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called "Linux" distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux.
>>
>>59226721
feh
>>
I like viewnoir, it's pretty minimal, but it does the job, I don't want much from an image viewer
What went wrong?
50 Posts / 19 Images
View this topic
>>
their fanbois exist
>>
>>59226708
Mainly BIOS problems
>>
File: 1488428278854.jpg (396KB, 512x949px) Image search:
[Google]
396KB, 512x949px
>>59226708
Cores
>accurate reaction to RYZEN lol
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226702
I don't get it
>>
>>59226702
>moon runes
>>
>>59226730
Let me try to explain it to you
>egg cracks
>small creature pops out
>both say "kyuun"
What is there not to get?
File: 8Rch6JF.png (55KB, 1509x905px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 1509x905px
Apparently Ryzen is sick for servers, those Nipples will be mighty fine.
https://www.servethehome.com/amd-ryzen-7-1700x-linux-benchmarks/
^
Some production benches even by dual Xeons.
>From a pure performance perspective, the AMD Ryzen is more than just competitive, it is downright awesome. After having hands-on time at the AMD Tech Day, I hit publish on our Ryzen pre-order story then promptly did so for a personal system and a system for our DemoEval lab (ETA on that one late March 2017 as it has some benchmarks it will be running in the meantime.) In fact, I even pre-ordered a complete set of components for STH’s William Harmon since I thought he would love the platform. We are going to have full power numbers once we get them in our standard test beds and into the data center.
>The true power of the Ryzen 7 1700X platform for STH readers, aside from gaming hobbies, will be replacing non-mission critical workstations with better hardware. If you are one of the Silicon Valley startups with a cluster of cheap Core i7 systems in the office or a set of AWS build instances constantly chugging, Ryzen is going to be worth a serious look. Likewise, there is a large segment of the dedicated server hosting business that today utilizes Core i7 chips. Given the choice between a Core i7 quad-core model and a Ryzen eight-core model, we would go with Ryzen.
And look at that voltage at 3.3GHz, a frequency a lot higher than what 20+ core chips use nowadays, the perf/watt is phenomenal.
46 Posts / 8 Images
View this topic
>>
File: peak power.png (45KB, 960x540px) Image search:
[Google]
45KB, 960x540px
>>59226509
8c/16t at 3.3ghz fitting inside of 60w when all threads are hammered to the max.
The Naples Opterons will likely be clocked somewhere around 2.5-2.7ghz which is remarkably high considering the core count.
The process clearly favors this range thats right in the sweetspot for enterprise SKUs.
>>
>>59226562
Yeah, I've seen the 1700 using around 70w running povray, with great performance to boot, that much cheap and high FPU performance at such a low power is something I would have never expected, I honestly expected AMD to really give us a "okay" FPU, but this is completely outside of my expectations.
>>
File: ryzen-power-chart.jpg (177KB, 885x1132px) Image search:
[Google]
177KB, 885x1132px
>>59226562
Some more power charts to help ya.
File: 1457469312107.png (15KB, 718x420px) Image search:
[Google]
15KB, 718x420px
Has anybody here ever bothered to COUNT the number of pixels on their monitor? How do you know you aren't being ripped off and given a few less for the companies to save money?
9 Posts / 4 Images
View this topic
>>
literally every os counts it automatically
>>
>>59226506
Yes, but how do you know that there isn't some firmware in the montor that tricks the OS?
File: Moon Shadow.gif (920KB, 600x331px) Image search:
[Google]
920KB, 600x331px
If shadows can move faster than the speed of light, would it be possible to use shadows or the "absence of light" to send information at faster than light speeds?
28 Posts / 5 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226291
>If shadows can move faster than the speed of light
They can't.
/thread
>>
>>59226291
>If shadows can move faster than the speed of light
They can't.
>>
>>59226291
No, because shadows are an absence of light. Plus, it would still be limited by the speed of the object being used to detect the difference.
File: 1488231196025.jpg (5KB, 225x225px) Image search:
[Google]
5KB, 225x225px
>bought PC mouse 2 months ago
>it often won't click, or if it does it's a double click
>it's infuriating
>decide to do a quick fix at home
>take it all apart
>fiddle with the clicking mechanism
>nick the circuitry
>it doesn't work anymore
>I'm supposed to be working on my thesis
11 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226196
Why didn't you just return it
>>
Stop being poor
>>
>>59226196
What kind of chink shit mouse did you buy and why didn't you try to get a replacement through the warranty.
File: 1488222875715.jpg (83KB, 393x325px) Image search:
[Google]
83KB, 393x325px
>click image in google images
>403 no hotlinking allowed
>click address bar and hit return to clear referrer
>same shit again
>have to copy/paste the url in new tab for image to load
Why did they do this?
7 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226174
>oh no, someone might use 300kb of bandwidth without visiting my site!
Because they're idiots, that's why, same as those people that include JS to try and block right-clicking.
I look forward to the day when browsers send blank referers by default, like how they started blocking popups by default after all the faggotry in the late 90s and early 2000s.
>>
>>59226242
This all adds up when you are a top result in a search. A single jpeg image could use gigabytes of bandwidth in a day vs 10kb placeholder.
>>
>>59226319
>go to a lot of effort to have a high ranking on search engines
>upset that all the traffic you went to all that trouble to attract uses up lots of bandwidth
Pick a lane.
File: 1610-lubuntu-default-wallpaper.png (2MB, 3200x2000px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 3200x2000px
Hey guys, I have a sort of an emergency, I need to turn my 0.04999 btc to 0.5 for food, does anyone have 0.0001 (literally 10 cents) in bitcoin? thanks, greatly appreciated
16 Posts / 1 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226142
>food
You mean drugs, right?
>>
>>59226142
Reread your post and make the appropriate corrections because you're asking for way more than 10 cents
>>
sent :^)
File: 1488316655094.png (282KB, 501x1200px) Image search:
[Google]
282KB, 501x1200px
I wanna try FreeBSD. Which tool should I use to run it without actually installing it on Debian? Am I looking for an "emulator" or "virtualisation"?
6 Posts / 2 Images
View this topic
>>
>>59226067
Try qemu. Graphical frontends exist.
>>
>>59226134
I downloaded and I'm building it right now. Apparently I had KVM enabled without knowing. From what I understand this means I get near native performance if I use amd64 (host architecture) software, is that correct?
>>
>>59226067
don't bother, BSD is only for people with autism