what the fuck is going on
Why would you post a thread like this offering no detail or insight as to what the fuck you're on about?
They had a massive outage on East coast yesterday. Are you still down? I lost all of my MPLS sites yesterday for about 10 minutes but that was it.
Was told it was routers causing problems and they had rebooted them to fix my problem but repairs were still under way.
This was at about 1:00 yesterday EST. Cincinnati service area.
Reddit sucks. Who'd doin' Voidlinux?
>>59218765
>Reddit sucks
leavin this here
>>59218776
>>59218776
>Using a security risk from 2006 as proof that Reddit sucks
I'm sorry, I don't like Reddit either, but please have a better reason as to why Reddit sucks. This is 2017, they have learned.
HOLY SHIT INTEL DETHRONED RYZEN DID IT BOYS
FORGET THE 1800X ITS A BUGGY TRASH THE 1700K IS WHERE ITS AT
HOW DOES JIM DO IT?
Really makes you think
How the fuck is a 1700X $30?
>>59218671
i'd buy it for 30$
(more like 100 of them)
I just want to clarify that those game benchmarks being shilled around aren't anything shocking if you actually read anything about Ryzen before the release. We knew Ryzen is going to have 52% more IPC than Excavator for months now and those benchmarks show exactly this. CB15 puts it exactly 7-8% behind Skylake in terms of IPC and we also see exactly this in gaming benchmarks in games that only utilize 4 cores. It's just that majority of those benchmarks make AMD look bad because if you talk about hundreds of frames per second a 8% difference can mean being dozens of frames. Still it's nothing shocking and no it won't be magically fixed by some bios update. Yes the mexican fatso fucked up his benchmarks by bottlenecking GPU. No you shouldn't worry or cry, this is literally what Ryzen promised you fucking morons.
Pic related, it's exactly what Ryzen promised and I guess few false flagging shills and AMD fanboys blew the IPC out of proportion.
>>59218261
IPC hardly affects gaming, you moron.
Games don't use 100% of a core. IPC only comes into play when you're using all the clocks.
The bad gaming performance is due to something else.
With SMT off compared to HT off, it only seems about 5-7% behind on average. Problems with games schedulers using SMT incorrectly is a big part of Ryzens problems.
But there are other problems too.
I'm going to wait for some Windows and game patches before I decide to buy or not. It looks attractive if they at least fix it in a few games to show it probably won't be a problem in future games.
>>59218261
Ryzen is a fantastic CPU and it lit a fire under intel's ass when it comes to their HEDT lineup.
Ryzen will bring prices of CPU down by a lot and create actual competition for the first time in more than a fucking decade which is good for everybody including intel since they'll have to actually produce better cpus with every new series.
All of that being said, at this point I cannot recommend, and you should be very suspicious of anybody that does, Ryzen for gaming focused builds.
Is it good enough for gaming? Pretty much yes, even the 1700 should be fine even a higher framerates.
Is it better than i7 7700K for gaming? No, it is not.
So if you look at the prices, and consider the discounts most retailers are doing right now, the choice is obvious.
>but I also encode video once is a blue moon, even though 80% of the time I spend on my computer not shitposting on 4chan is gaming
You should buy the better CPU for what you do most of the time, not for what you do every once in a while.
TL;DR:
Ryzen 7 is great but not for gaming
Ryzen 5 will likely trade blows with 7700k and be the best bang for buck
https://systemspace.link/index.php
Explain what you know of Tsuki and how does this translate to a cult?
pic unrelated
>>/x/18703428
I registered.
>>59217955
>buy domain
>code a website
>be some edgykid
>say something is going to happen
>spam this shit on 4chinz
>???
>profit
>>59218282
it kinda began on /x/
now it's blown up a little bit since
AYYMD IS FINISHED & BANKRUPT
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>>/biz/
>>59217794
blame the dumbass reviewers, who criticized it's gaming performance despite it never being marketed as a gaming CPU it's always been marketed as a HEDT and something to bridge the gap between gaming and workstation, and has the trade offs of that positioning.
>>59217878
This. The stock market is not rational.
This sounds about right
>In b4 damage control
Very much agree. Also keep in mind that most of these games are compiled using icc so they're targeting the intel processors to begin with. And yet AMD is still competitive.
I game on a fucking 1055t, what the fuck are people playing that need these CPUs just for a fucking video game?
>>59217039
I think the only real issue in games is number 3. and the fact that games are tailored to Intel's SMT implementation.
Number 1 and 2 sound plausible but AMD isn't dumb enough to make their CCX to CCX communication that slow... and the statically provisioned parts of the SMT implementation can be dealt with in other ways to improve a single threads performance.
Why does every different language use the word functor for a completely different concept? Haskell, C++, OCaml...
>>59215949
elaborate
Because it's exactly the same abstraction underlying. Only the syntax and the commonly taught intuition changes.
Functors are (depending on the functor to varying degree) structure preserving mappings.
best formfactor, more then sufficient hardware for the next years, best mobile os.
period.
>>59215342
>best formfactor, more then sufficient hardware for the next years
yes
>best mobile os.
no
>>59215342
>IOS
>best mobile os
>>59215342
>No clover
>Expensive in my country
>Church of emacs is now in session
>The church of emacs as no god, but it does have an editor
>ITT we praise emacs unironically
>There are several layers of the church of emacs.
>the kernel
>core autists who know how it works
>the shell
>mid tier autists who use it but don't know how it works
>sub tier autists
>all people are on the autism spectum but these ones are on the wrong side of the spectrum
>to be a saint in the church of emacs you must purge your computer of all proprietary software including the firmware and bios
>To use VI is not a sin but a pennance
>But seriously don't fall for the vim meme
blessed are those who bestow on them the source of the all editor.
>>59215181
Hah! Is funny cause he no embarrass about being see jacking off, he embarrass about RMS see him Windows!
I'm thinking of building a nas and after some research, it is suggested that I use ecc ram to prevent data corruption. I chose to go with a g4560 and it says on intel's specs page that it supports ecc ram, as well as the motherboard that I selected. However, whenever i go to filter the ram for ecc, nothing pops up. I tried removing the compatibility filter and it says that the ram is not compatible with my cpu. Is this a mistake on pcpartpicker's account, or am I missing something here?
and with motherboard as well. Both say they support ecc ram
>>59215133
>>59215161
Obligatory >g/sqt/ link, but I'll help you regardless.
Quick googling says that the g4560 doesn't support ECC memory, and to be fair, ECC is only useful for extra-large implementations like workstation servers and bank mainframes that process hundreds of thousands of requests daily. For a home NAS, the risk of corruption is far, far too small to warrant the necessity of ECC RAM.
Also, I'd suggest going with something like a celeron/athlon if you want to go purely NAS, as you won't need the G4560's power unless you plan to transcode/use it as a HTPC.
Plus, it's easier on power consumption.
I found a Lenovo ThinkPad T430 laptop Core i7 3.6GHZ 1600X900 NVIDIA 500GB 8GB listed at 350$. Is it worth the extra cost for the i7 core and 1600x900 res?
Yes Yes Yes.
yes. i don't know about the i7 but 1600 x 900 will make your computing experience much nicer than 1366 x 768
i'm of the opinion that 1080p is too much for a 15 inch screen, sucks alot more resources and everything will be fucking tiny and you'll scale up anyways
what is the best advanced book to learn Python programming if you know the basics of the language (I went through a DiveIntoPython3 book to learn it)?
>>59214712
Violent Python.
Pretty solid, especially if you're considering going into security.
learn node instead
>>59214712
http://www.cprogramming.com/tutorial/lesson1.html
WTF?!? Pajeet has taken over Age of Empires as well!?!?! They just announced,
Age of Empires II: Rise of the Rajas.
>>59214709
Will Raja save the VR meme?
CAN"T BEAT THE PAJEET
What should i upgrade next?
i currently have this
CPU: AMD FX-9590 4.7GHz 8-Core
CPU Cooler, Noctua NH-U14S CPU Cooler
Thermal Compound: Noctua NT-H1 3.5G
Motherboard: Asus Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 ATX
Memory: Kingston Blu Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 1866 MHz
Storage1 Samsung 850 EVO Series 250GB SSD
Storage2: Seagate Barracuda 2TB 7200RPM
Video Card: GeForce GTX 970 GALAX 4GB OCed Edition
Case: NZXT H440 (White) ATX Mid Tower Case
Power Supply: Corsair 750W RM
Operating System: Windows 10
Case Fans: Noctua NF-F12 PWM 120mm
Mouse: Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard: IBM Model M / ANNE PRO
Headphones: Logitech G933
Monitor 1: AOC G2460PG 144hz (G-Sync)
Monitor 2: AOC G2460P 144hz
Monitor 3 BenQ XL2411T 144hz
Monitor Stand: MS300
pic not related
>>59214470
almost fell for beito
>>59214498
what beito
>>59214470
Upgrade that mobo man.