Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 315. page

Does this mean I can finally install an AOSP fork and remove touchjizz on my S7?

Why can't we have a stock phone with GNU/BSD userland and utils and the graphic stack and kernel from whatever kernel the vendor is using ?

>>62267212
Meanwhile another iOS vulnrability is discovered to allow users to jailbreak and actually use their device, but that doesn't mean anything!! Android is bad!!

>Appletards and their poorphones

>>62267109
Good thread.

File: 1458967866043.png (119KB, 288x291px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 288x291px

>>62267109
>tfw bought an i5 like a reasonable person

>>62267127
my condolences

File: 111.png (90KB, 534x442px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 534x442px

what up 6600k bro

File: file.png (155KB, 904x602px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 904x602px

If you insist

File: speccy.png (71KB, 752x566px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 752x566px

More 6600k.

Because I want to.

>>62267038
because im not poor

File: tmp_1504347280940-731900137.jpg (63KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1200x1200px

>>62267038
>wanting to appease disgusting consumerist pig sluts
wew lad

You have a Thinkpad too?

>>62266949
How'd you know

>>62266940

just about to put my thinkbaby to sleep, wish me luck

>>62266919
God I love anime

>>62266919
How would you implement a real-time software audio mixer without locking, given that you can afford to load whole uncompressed PCM files (yup, all 3-5MB right into RAM).
The interface is, of course, a callback from another thread, this is the way it works in PortAudio, SDL2 and libsoundio (which I'm using), where you have to fill the buffer.
The solution I've seen is a circular buffer, but it works bad when you want to loop a song, also this approach was designed with music streaming in mind. I'm looking for a simpler solution.
This is what I've come up so far:

typedef struct DgAudioTrack {
    DgAudio *audio;
    bool looping;
    size_t index;
} DgAudioTrack;
struct DgAudio {
    size_t bufferSize;
    uint8_t *buffer;
};

The API is quite simple too:
1. Play sound.
2. Loop sound.
3. Stop sound (must be atomic operation).

Now the hardest thing is the callback: how to make it not to segfault in various circumstances that can could happen.

So I came up with this solution:

for each frame
    for each track
        retrieve audio pointer // must be atomic
        // now at this moment either playSound or stopSound
        // or loopSound could have been called, so *everything else*
        // in DgAudioTrack may be utterly incorrect except
        // the audio pointer
        add audio frame // this must be always safe
        // no matter what track.index and track.looping is
        // it might be glitchy for 1/22050 of a second (playing
        // invalid frame because track.index or track.looping has
        // been corrupted immediately after the atomic audio
        // pointer retrieval, however unlikely that might be), but it's
        // ok

And playAudio and loopAudio is just:

stopTrack // atomic
track.looping = looping
track.index = 0
track.audio = audio

So this is blazingly fast and simple, in expense of heavy memory usage. What do you think?

File: Zig.png (3KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 200x200px

Code in Zig!

http://ziglang.org/
http://andrewkelley.me/post/intro-to-zig.html
https://github.com/zig-lang/zig
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11060282
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/44skm2/introducing_the_zig_programming_language/
https://www.reddit.com/r/Zig/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiintPutWrE
https://www.infoworld.com/article/3113083/application-development/new-challenger-joins-rust-to-upend-c-language.html

File: 1487428268825.jpg (242KB, 2048x1896px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 2048x1896px

>superb phone
>superb price
>exclusive to Pajeets

>>62266749
Why the fuck would anyone want vanilla android?

MIUI looks much better

>5.5

FFS the leaks said it was gonna be a 5.2". Why does literally every phone maker only do phones in this meme size?

Feels like a brick in your pocket and not the easiest to control with 1 hand for us handlets.

Java

Install Gentoo

>>62266723
> wants to censor the n-word
> uses the r-word

File: Screenshot_20170905-110323.png (213KB, 1440x2960px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1440x2960px

my phone is a larger resolution than that

Who's this semen demon?

>>62266748
your real mother

>>62266623
Might take a year before that shows up.

>>62266623
Does mine craft even utilise the gpu? And what's going on with the screen setup, why isn't he using wraparound ultra wide, sorta looks like he's just cloning his display but with a different menu I stance on each screen...or is he some kind of turbo autistic play 3 x multilayer by himself?

Everything about that picture is painful to look at
There isn't even a way to describe the dull agony images like this bring me.
I wonder, sometimes, what it's like to be born into wealth. Then I remember I'd be completely oblivious to what a smug jackass I'd look like, and realize I'm better off being a schmuck wageslave

>>62266597
>linux
>getting shit done
well memed my friend

>>62266604
I write documents using LaTeX daily at work using vim+tmux on Mint, it has worked perfectly for years.

>>62266613
Why not use Office like a normal human being?

Chrome was a lot better before Firefox got multiprocess and started to implement parts of Servo into Gecko

>>62266560
i tried chrome once.

i've also been pegged by my GF.

i'd rather be pegged than use chrome again.

>>62266560
>>62266647
>>62266665
The Firefox shilling on this board is getting intense

>>62266387
He's like /g/ and /vr/ made a surprisingly high functioning baby.

>>62266387
Who is that?

I guess. He seems to have an actual interest in retro tech and made his hobby his job.

>>>/biz/

>>62266398
It's not about the money... I'm just asking on your guys opinion on capabilities of ASICs. Are they only for Bitcoin, or only for sha256 coins, or do they just process...


I mean... They do just the number crunching right? Software is the one doing all the job no?

>>62266370
Bitcoin ASICs are designed for the SHA256 instruction set. Most altcoins that are actually worth something are not SHA256.