Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 20. page

Shit tier bait. Fuck off op.

File: Capture+_2017-09-15-21-47-19.png (2MB, 1440x2392px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1440x2392px

Firefox nightly
>or Firefox beta 4 cux

>>62455485
>Firefox nightly

is it just night theme firefox?

File: wp1199.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

if only we had a board for wallpapers

>>62454114
>>>/wg/

>>62453536
https://nmap.org/book/legal-issues.html

tl;dr a port scan shouldn't be illegal, but that won't keep you from getting arrested and dragged through the courts

>>62453536
15% scanning

You'll get an angry letter from your ISP telling you to stop or they'll turn off your internet

stuxnet
flame

>>62453037
Define "rewrite."

>>62453175

Like: nerd writes a piece of software for solving problems in the year 2020. Same software will be able to solve stuff in the year 3000.

While the test used an Atlas V rocket for deployment the X37b would be the perfect method of delivery of the EKV. The X37b went back up on the latest spacex launch right around the time shit started hitting the fan with NK.

What better way to stress test the vehicle than to do it after 2 years versus right when it's deployed? 2 years of radiation, space dust bombardment etc and THEN do the test to make sure it still works.

Estimated X37b payload capacity = 500lbs
Raytheon EKV = 120 - 140 lbs

3 to 4 EKVs on a highly maneuverable platform, to disable multiple warheads during the easiest time to do so, prior to atmospheric reentry. Response time drastically cut down. Much safer instead of trying to deal with a PR disaster of launching tactical nuclear warheads if something fucked up (and violates 1967 treaty) or dealing with the additional fuel for traditional booster-based disarmament methods, also missiles in space are a terrible idea. Kinetic and laser are the ways to go.
it just makes sense.
Below is the white paper for what the OTV-5 mission is supposed to be about. Don't know why it couldn't be tested on a cheaper platform instead of the Air Force's most advanced and weapons capable space plane in service.
An excerpt:
"Microgravity influence on fluid flow, especially two-phase flow, is significantly different than in a terrestrial environment. This is true for steady-state operations, but is more important for transient operation. In
addition, the combined effects of the space environment (e.g. thermal Cutaway of an oscillating heat pipe (OHP) showing its microchannel pattern cycling, high vacuum, charging, vibration) are required to verify the performance of the system on orbit for long duration"
That's all fine and dandy, but it could have still been launched on anything other than the X37B. The official manifest shows "several smaller satellites" on board. Probably an EKV or two. The oscillating heat pipe wouldn't take up much space anyway.

Something else of interest, United Launch Alliance's Atlas V rocket (used in all prior X37B launches) uses Russian designed and manufactured RD-180 engines, while the Merlin engines on the Falcon 9 are completely in house developed....a move that NASA and the Pentagon has been dumping money into in order to wean themselves off of Russian help for putting things into orbit and beyond.
It doesn't even sound like something the Pentagon would blow money on. $62,000,000 to launch this? Nah buddy you're smoking something strong if you expect me to believe that. It's going to spend another 2 years going round and round waiting for some shit to pop off.

http://www.kirtland.af.mil/Portals/52/Advanced%20Structurally%20Embedded%20Thermal%20Spreader%20II.pdf

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2017/05/31/watch-the-exact-moment-a-kill-vehicle-takes-out-a-mock-ballistic-missile/?utm_term=.d26d4e865352

File: 1386368247934.gif (2MB, 400x197px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x197px

>>62453003
Interesting post op

File: 1492804891139.jpg (56KB, 960x415px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 960x415px

>>62452957
https://youtu.be/7F6hX3NctYc?t=384

I hope by AR you mean

>>62452673
You're not ready for Linux

>>62452673
You should not post your tech support questions here. ¿Have you downloaded a torrent client and linked it to .torrent files already?

>go to online shopping site of choice
>search for computer monitor
>filter by
>min size 27 inch
>refresh rate 60hz
>resolution 1440p
>???
>profit

>>62452588
i have done that but i never seem to find that perfect monitor or it seems to show me nothing but acer pixio and msi of all things tjat like going motherboard shopping and being offered asrock biostar amd msi as your only options

t. itoddler

>>62452532
Finance is gay. I had an offer from Goldman Sachs for only 140k a year, when Google and Facebook were offering 200k in a state with no income tax.

>>62452704
What about the bonus?

oh man are we gonna learn about properly cooked pork shoulders?

>>62452343
>fourth keynote that is nothing but memes in a fucking row
But why.
You don't do that when you have nothing to show.
Intel killed IDF because of that.

how is this technology

Wow that's fucking garbage. You need to go to /w/ or /wg/ and learn how to make a home screen.

File: Screenshot_20170915-192302.png (863KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 1080x1920px

>>62451847

>>62451610
Sometimes

>>62451622
OK.

the major benefit of android 8 is worse emojis

File: 200_s.gif (19KB, 267x200px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 267x200px

>>62451577

I want to breathe new life to my Tab E 9.6 but I doubt it'll even officially get 8.0 OTA or even unofficial ports/ROMS

Still waiting on that supposed Nougat OTA they're supposed to roll out to my Tab E 9.6, sure is taking SamSHIT forever to roll out the OTA.............

I'll be God damn happy if OTA Oreo or ROM does come to my tablet though

Set media.autoplay.enabled to false in about:config

Nevermind, found it:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1141200

Now, which Firefox Fork shall I use?
Currently using Waterfox, but if it also throws out extensions I might have to run Cyberfox until it reaches EOL.
Any other good forks out there?

(I mean they literally just need to use various compilers and keep publishing ESR builds.)

>>62451630
Yeah, just found it, ty. Bretty gud.

>>62451638
Well I hate the current state of web. Firefox is just extremely slow, but on Chrome I have the autoplay. FML.

>>62451163
Are you implying that the linux kernels doesn't use object oriented principles? Because it does. Just not in the braindead copy paste boilerplate way. The original GoF book was attempting to enshrine actual effective industry practice. Sure that got subverted pretty early on by people thinking that if it wasn't a clear design pattern it was BAD CODE. Browse the kernel source and you will see heavy reliance on encapsulation and composability and even some visitor patterns. Probably more but it has been a decade since I took that class and I don't rememebr any more OO memes.

>>62451306
>need