Archived threads in /g/ - Technology - 1062. page

>>61757884
because then every webm would be a screamer

>>61757889
is every gif gay porn?

>>61757884
I think moot said before that he doesn't want 4chan to turn into a video sharing site
Also every third webm would be a screamer

File: 150831165121-google-05-31-1999-to-05-05-2010-780x439.png (478KB, 780x439px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 780x439px

Ah yes. I remember the days of the internet wild west fondly. The days when limewire and kazoo dominated illegal file sharing. The heyday of flash-based browser gaming. Runescape, Adventure Quest, Club Penguin. Before tracking. Before widespread social media. Before the dawn of the social justice warrior. Truly a time that is beyond us now. I remember these days as I would a fallen comrade.

File: milw0rm-wi.jpg (43KB, 445x71px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 445x71px

Yes...

File: pouring-out-liquor.gif (327KB, 500x203px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 500x203px

No, that internet was shite too. So was the mid-late 90s internet. It hasn't been good since AOL ruined Usenet and all the BBS communities that had been tight for years slowly died off.

>>61757701
No, its a retarded idea. Drobos and Synologies are shitboxes. They'll die after a few years because they use Intel Atoms which have serious known issues. Even if they didnt it would still be retarded. You should just buy a HBA/RAID card with external SAS ports, or a internal to external SAS adapter bracket and a disk shelf. It will be cheaper and better and you'll get far more expansion capability.

>>61757768
>HBA/RAID card

OOh that's a hot idea actually.

My server (T320 just found out) has a hardware RAID card already with SAS ports in the back (I think there's 2).

Would you recommend an external SAS box to connect this to?

Maybe in the future I can expand the DELL server but I have to move like 20TB of stuff and then replace drives and then copy it back to the server which is a pain.

>>61757829
>My server (T320 just found out) has a hardware RAID card already with SAS ports in the back (I think there's 2).
Then that'll save you $50.

>Would you recommend an external SAS box to connect this to?
Whatever is cheap on ebay. Just be aware that anything is 3gbps SAS1 will likely only support 2TB disks, so look for something which is 6gbps SAS2. You can also find eSAS cables on there for cheap. You can also daisy chain multiple disk shelfs together.

Be aware that it'll probably be loud with fans which dont do speed control, so be prepared to replace them.

Alternatively if you want to build something which can be repurposed in the future, go find some Super Micro chassises with SAS expanders (not with the direct connect backplanes), buy internal to external sas brackets, the cabling and part number CSE-PTJBOD-CB1. Should you ever want a 2nd server in the future all you'll have to do is replace the CSE-PTJBOD-CB1 card with a motherboard/cpu/ram.

>Maybe in the future I can expand the DELL server but I have to move like 20TB of stuff and then replace drives and then copy it back to the server which is a pain.
wut?

File: 1501992951266.png (150KB, 374x523px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 374x523px

>>61757657

be female
be a minority
be a female minority
be transgender

those are your 4 options
i recommend pretending to be a tranny, that usually works

File: 1501992904744.png (77KB, 351x490px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 351x490px

>>61757657
>>61757662

>>61757544
>>61757544
>Why would any sane person think its a good idea to give away the fruit of years of their labor and any competitive advantage, for free.
Because software piracy exists

>>61757544
And any pajeetski could just copy paste, closed up the source and take credit if they feel like it?

but that's wrong you idiot.
free software doesn't mean public domain or non-copyrighted software.

the author still owns a copyright (nobody can do anything without sourcing you) and with non-cuck licenses like Apache 2.0 or GPL nobody can release any copy or derivative of the software without releasing it under a license at least as free.

People get caught and sued for a ton of money every year on things like GPL violations. You can't "just copy paste" off someone's github and release a closed source (or one that does not give credit to the owner of the copyright) copy and expect to get away with it.

>>61757582
>sued for GPL violation
lmao

If you're oracle, sure.
If your project name doesn't start with LINUX, the GNU GPL conservatory is NOT going to waste their precious funds defending your no-name GPL software

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-06 at 1.13.04 AM.png (18KB, 692x282px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 692x282px

>>61757532
>I tried once to move one of the files to a folder that is not created, and what I got is a message says that the file is moved.
No what you got was a message saying it couldn't be moved

>I think it should give an error from the start that the system can't find the destination folder.
It does, you're just illiterate, pic related.

File: 11.png (17KB, 749x357px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 749x357px

>>61757707
123.txt is a text file that was created on the desktop.
After typing the move command to a folder that has not been created, the system creates a new file that can't be opened.
And I already tried the same thing in XP.

>>61758684
All you did there was rename 123.txt to Test

It can be opened, you were just retarded and didnt give it a dot 3 extension so it doesnt know what program to open it with. You either manually choose a program to open it with or give it a dot 3 extension like .txt

>>61757454
Right: The tried and true option that has proven itself coutless times

Left: Some trendy new comer that will become nothing more than a popular niche language but won't have a lasting impact.


hmmm...I wonder....hmmmm....

>>61757571
forth is older than c ya dingus

>>61757454
Mental issues.

>>61757320
>hey /g/uys! It's my first time on this subreddit! Hehe see what I did there? xD I really need help because my gentoo installation didn't go well, so can you guys help???

just fuck my shit UP

>>61757320
the year of the Linux desktop is a reddit thing

We just don't want you to be fucking retarded.

Normies can teethe on Android and iOS. I want the year of the Linux workstation.

It makes things easier for normies, so they don't care

>>61757267
>google - startpage/cock mail/OpenStreetMap/mega.nz
>amazon - eBay/godaddy
>facebook - myspace/instagram/google+

>>61757267
Accelerationism is the only way to approach late stage commercialized internet. The sooner this shit crashes and burns the sooner we can get to work on web 3.0.

>>61757253
I'm very tempted.

My current graphics card is the AMD 6950 (circa 2010). The performance has obviously degraded but I've been waiting to see how Gsync/Freesync pan out, and I was broke. AMD dropped support this year and I have the cash so I'm ready to upgrade. But Nvidia's cards are ancient. Gotta wait for the next generation. Or get another AMD card, but that's a sinking ship.

Will Nvidia respond at the 1070 price point? soon? Does that even matter when you factor in the additional cost of Gsync over Freesync? Are monitors settled to a point where I can safely disregard HDR? Is an affordable high refresh rate 4k monitor a possibility (as a second for gaming)?

Buying now is risky, but monitor tech moves glacially. Opportunity cost?

>>61757253
you assume that for a year there will be no AIB cards on the market to buy?

As far as housefire concerns go, the only one you might really have to worry about is one you probably won't get because it's one that is only a rumor at this point, and that is a modern version of the Asus Rog Ares. (the old one featured two GPU's on one card)

Having two Vega's on one PCB might be OK if you have a very good water cooling setup, but a potential TDP of 600+ might frighten most people away.

right

>>61757184
Left.

Right

I'd have no problem with the left if they didn't remove magsafe

She just posted that pic

Do you stalk her?

>>61757216
shes my wife idiot
now please talk about cpus

who is she (male)

>>61757116
that panasonic whatever.
or uh, a sony qx1 or whatever its called.

>>61757136
aren't you a helpful one

You could buy a lumia which are superb at camera-making or get the nexus 6

File: nokia-8[1].jpg (346KB, 2000x1125px) Image search: [Google]

346KB, 2000x1125px

>>61757116

can you wait for nokia 8? If not you may look at Huawei P10 or high end sony models.

read the manual/guide

>>61757106
It doesn't explain it in enough detail

File: Asahi_SMTIV_Final.png (706KB, 684x1428px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 684x1428px

ayo nigga you down wit the gentoo clown

Ignore it? See you later in /trash/ Anon. :^)

>>61756895
;^)))

>>61756905
I don't know when anon is being ironic anymore.