how many years of roids would I need to achieve something like

>>42899707
Post body pic. Lifting for 6 years means different things for different people.

File: image.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

>>42899720
Am I genetically cucked?

>>42899774
You look like someone with good genetics who maybe played sports but never lifted a day in his life. What are your stats?

>>42899707
This is years of roiding.
Your response depends on:
- your source/the actual drugs
- your genes: with regards to both your growth and side effects
- your ability to tolerate side effects (both mental and physiological tolerance)
- your diet

Furthermore there's good reasons to not immediately run the 5 or so compounds this guy is probably using straight away, you have to gradually increase and experiment. This alone takes months.

Training matters little as long as you fatigue each muscle regularly and don't injure yourself by ego lifting.

So there is no real way to give an accurate timespan but at least a few years.

>>42899900

My bests are

B : 325
S : 445
D : 495

>>42899981
Good info. What compounds specifically do you think this guy is running and at what dosages ?

>>42899707
>makes your body look uglier
>causes cataracts
>high blood pressure
>creates a dependence on the drug

Why do people take roids?

>>42900031

>causes cataracts
source?

>>42900021
Not him but tren, deca, mast, drol are probably used on top of a test base. Depends if he's off season or show prep. Deca and drol for making good gains. Mast, tren, nan are good for slimming/recomp. EQ probably in there too.

>>42900031
>uglier
That's opinion
>cataracts
Maybe if you abuse dnp on low cal without watching micros
>high bp
Easily manageable
>dependence
Cruising minimal test to maintain gains isn't much of a dependency.

>>42899900
>never lifted a day in his life
No need for hyperbole. U look good OP

>>42899707
>>42899981
>>42900021

ya boy is most likely training solely for aesthetics and not for functional strength, rendering him completely useless in any sport that requires fast movement. that means high reps with low weight. (Schwarzkopf lifted no less than 30 reps with 50% his 1rm)

also avoid full range of motion at all costs, 1/4 rep should be the most motion you use for maximum aesthetics and minimum functional strength

>>42900119
are u srs? OPs pic is chris bumstead, hes literally an ox. strong as fuck

>>42900031
>>42900119
Where the fuck did all these trip fags come from?

>>42900459
They're the retards that shitpost bad info all over /fit/

>>42900153
True shit, met him a few times, guys a literal gentle giant

>>42899774
Training history? Height and weight? Goal body

>>42900693
i used to lift for football now just lift as hobby, and im 6'3 210

>>42900052
It's from DNP usage. Lots of thermogenics can cause cataracts since your eyes overheat and don't have a chance to cool down since you're on for too long.

>>42900764
If you don't mind me asking, what did you do for football? Did you have a specific routine?

t. 6'7 dyel former basketball player

>>42900895

yeah we pretty much did something similar to SS. Pretty much just linear progression routine, did main lifts pressing/squat/dead/cleans twice a week with rep ranges around 5-8 and threw in some minimal functional accessory work like box jumps, pullups, rows, etc.

Thats Chris Bumstead who just got 2nd in Classic and is a genetic freak(besides biceps) - so a while. He's like 22 though