So this "body positivity" "fat activist"

>>42462531
I simply do not care

File: IMG_6118.png (235KB, 582x600px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 582x600px

>>42462531


There's literally nothomg positive about the article. She's shaming a fitness blogger for being fit. This shits getting ridiculous. She calls fit people privileged (spelled wrong in the article) at least 20 times. This woman got paid to write that shit... its rage inducing.

File: IMG_6119.jpg (43KB, 797x609px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 797x609px

>>42462531

WHAT THE FUCK IS A FAT ACTIVIST. FAT... ACTIVIST?!?!?!?

It's under there "heathy living" section of their blog. Is this a joke?

If she really believed in body positivity she wouldn't feel the need to attack other women. She also uses the word privilege, clearly identifying herself as the oppressed victim and the fit woman as the oppressor, thereby removing the fit woman's agency and ability to respond from anything other than a position of power.

>>42462558
She probably didn't get paid to write it desu, maybe she sold it after it was finished for 20 USD tops

>>42462990
No she's an assistant editor? Don't know what that means, but she's a staff writer. Turns out she's not even a mom but writes for cafe mom. Her life is a lie and she's getting a salary.

>>42463012
Oh I didn't know, most people submit their shitty unedited articles to websites like that either for free or a nominal fee... It's kind of shocking that she's an assistant editor, well, marginally shocking

>>42463057

*senior* editor. Still don't know what that entails. Looking through her backlog of posts they're all this rage inducing. Not a single article with positive subject. She shames someone different in each of her articles.

>>42462531
Archive that shit, I ain't giving them clicks.