I can't find this specific design (apart from one in the wrong size on ebay) anywhere.
Just weird. Not a fan
>>12757788
I like they design on the onestars but I way prefer the general aesthetics of the all stars. These seem like a great compromise, plus they just look cool imo
>>12757778
One star mids seem to be pretty easy to cop, not quite the same but pretty close. I like them more desu
https://www.converse.com/us/en_us/pw/mens-converse-one-star-mid-top-shoes/7puZpirZr3oZoi3Zs9r
>>12757806
The normal ones are pretty average desu, I'd rather the low tops if I can't find these.
>>12757778
target
>>12758472
Lying sak o shit
>>12758917
It's the truth but I've only seen low-tops
>>12757778
These look really bad, like a guy decided to wake up and make his own shoes
>>12758917
>>12758927
I'm the anon that said Target. I'm not lying. Before converse mainline reintroduced the one stars, they sold them exclusively at Target. Thats why these ones have the rubber toe cap on them. They were like a cheaper version of the All Star, just had the star, making them One Star. I know because I bought a pair when I was in middle school, these exact ones pictured. I don't believe Target carries them anymore, but it is indeed where they were sold. :) Hope that helps
>>12758917
They're from the Fall 2011 Converse One Star Collection :)
>>12759603
>>12758917
more specifically the "TARGET Fall 2011 Coverse One Star Collection"
>>12759598
I believe you anon, forgive me for my sin of calling you a sak o shit and thank you for going out of your way to prove that they indeed sold them at Target. May your day be an awesome one and don't forget, you're still a sak o shit :)
>>12759675
I love proving dummies wrong :)
>>12759675
Yeah I got the low tops at target back in 2010 or so
>>12759603
>>12759598
Thanks heaps anon. I'm from Australia so it might be slightly trickier but this helps stacks
>>12757778
Bandwagon fucktard
90$+, but you can get it straight off converse website. Only Grey, Green, or Black and they are called the Converse One Star '74 Mid Vintage Suede.
What of these are more /fa/?
>>12761617 or >>12757778
>>12761975
Neither of these are fashionable.
I know this is a stretch but is there anywhere I can buy these online and choose the size and such? simply googling just turns up a few second hands
>>12761617
hideous
>>12762274
well since they do seem to be out of production, since theyre from 2011 as seen in >>12759603
im guessing second hand is the only way