Red pill me on (Adidas) GATs please. I want a slight militaristic

>>12703611
What's the official name of the shoe? I want a pair. Wasn't the original shoe a WW1 army trainer? I really like them

if you can't afford MMM paint splatter gats then gats shouldn't even be on your radar they're the only ones that matter, cop a $50 pair of sambas at your local mall if you can't afford MMM paint splatter gats

if you're considering MMM non-paint splatter gats you are a FOOL

>>12703630
fuck off

File: onitsuka-tiger-mexico-66-white-white-DL408-0101_2.jpg (43KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 470x313px

>>12703630
awful opinion
what about all white mexico 66s?

>>12703630
No one wears paint splatter MMM's any more you inbred

>>12703660
holy SHIT those are tight

>>12703611
That looks horrible lol

finally got me a normal pair of white sneakers without shit on soles

File: b8.png (8KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 512x512px

>>12703630
as tradition

>>12703660
these are sick thanks

File: IMG_3968.jpg (176KB, 844x1500px) Image search: [Google]

176KB, 844x1500px

>>12703611
I would just cop og gats over white adidas gats. I have my eye on the black ones though- plan to cop them around "winter" (which is summer-lite in florida)

>>12703660
ugly as fuck

File: red circle gats.jpg (175KB, 500x729px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 500x729px

>>12703630
absolute shit tier opinion

>>12703611
Buy OGs not the adidas re-edition. Less branding and literally 25% of the price for the same shoe.

is the tongue on these like the plastic tongue on the gazelles?

>>12704840
it's not the same shoe in terms of comfort, quality of materials and construction.

>>12704897
Yeah OGs are better

>>12704809
wrong

>>12704840
those are mmm btw

>>12703630
Only niggers and fuccbois wear the paint splatter ones

>>12705011
They're a literal pair of surplus gats that Mmm "reconstructed"/repainted

>>12703627
They were invented in the 30s for the German team in the Olympics.

>>12704790
Don't. The "leather" is shit. It's not even black, it's grey and very shiny. The retail price is laughable. If they were the same price as Stan Smiths, they would maybe be worth it. Just save up for some MMM GATs like I'm doing now. Or buy Svensson GATs, on sale they're just 60 euros more than the Adidas, but the difference in quality is huge. Hell, even og gats would be more worth it for the money than Adidas.

>>12705101
theyre the same price as Stan Smiths in some places

>>12704977
except they're not, they're cheaply made and relatively uncomfortable. the adidas bw army sneakers are normal sneaker quality, i.e., a significant upgrade in comfort in quality.

>>12705101
Advice taken, thanks anon

>>12705066
i like them :/

>>12703611
Quality is garbage I've heard
Price tag is ridiculous on several levels if you think about it
It's way past due, it would probably be considered classic already had they released it in 2008 or something but they really messed up with the timing, all I can think is they will make boost version or something similar with it soon
Get surplus or save up for margiela

File: wjUuDJJ.jpg (2MB, 2308x2352px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2308x2352px

I really hate the sole on the Svensson, it screws up the aesthetics completely.

CARDBOARD TONGUE LITERALLY TOILET PAPER

>>12705071
still MMM

>>12705389
What significance does that hold? Why can't you just paint and old pair of be gats yourself and literally save hundreds of dollars

File: 2017-08-24 16.13.07.jpg (733KB, 1920x2560px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 1920x2560px

Can't decide what tshirt color?

>>12705438
shirtless

>>12703611
I have been wearing a pair of the black ones for a couple months. The leather is dark grey but I think they look great. They're pretty comfy too, with quite a bit of padding. I think they're more comfortable than the pairs of OG's I wore a while ago.

WORST shoelace sin history of shoelaces.
You have to double knot these bitches. Also too short.

File: palladium-palladium-pampa-hi-originale-hommes-butt.jpg (107KB, 1024x1024px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1024x1024px

Relaunch of the shoes they originally made for the French Foreign Legion as far as I know

>>12705462
nice to get feedback from peeps who own these, ty

>>12705003
no those are awful in shape and proportion, profile is horrendously low. The asics logo on the side is ugly too. Good luck with your terrible shoes

>>12705231
id on pants?

>>12706571
I gotta update this guy some time. haven't added the adidas reboots yet.

>>12706828
some of those are gone forever now, e.g., adidas doesn't do custom sambas anymore

>>12705389
you clearly have never seen a pair of MMM then

>>12706773
no the same guy, but what is the threshold between horrendously low and acceptably low? you like high tops?