How old were you when you realized that sub-Gandhi = subhuman and that if you're sub-Gandhi there is literally zero (0) point to looksmaxxing or wearing clothes?
>>12574945
>i can't into photoshop so I will squish all these heads, the post.
>>12574965
>implying squishing the picture wouldn't improve most of these horsefaced incel potatoes
>>12574965
I think he did a good job.
Every single one of them gets BTFO when put side by side with him.
>>12574992
He's legit a different species from incels, still mogs the entire planet even in a front cam selfie and shit lighting
Pitt, Chico and Barret don't even get mogged that hard desu...
>>12575033
Chico and Barret are legit 99th percentile and STILL get MOGGED, might not be as hard as legit potatocel subhumans like Leo, Bateman or Goose, but they still turn legit INVISIBLE next to a GOD like Gandhi
>>12575011
So handsome
>>12575047
>still mogs 99.99% of humans as an oldcel bloatcel norwoodcel
>>12574945
>>12575046
It's Gandy you goddamn retard. That said, David Gandy is undeniably good looking. Even his massive hooked nose works for him, but it's his eye area that is his crowning glory. His brow ridge and eye shape are very striking. And he actually got better looking past his 30's. Now he's getting too damn old haggard, but still very handsome.
I want Lookism retards to go and stay go
>>12575258
Men look objectively better as they mature. Look at most male sex symbols that don't pander to teenage girls and tell me otherwise
>>12575047
Sorry, but Gandy doesn't look good here, it's probably the hd picture but the combination of asymmetry and weird eyes make him look 8.5/10
>>12575047
Looks shit. The majority of his pics are all air brushed.