Thoughts?

>>12544755
Embarrassing

File: 18765741_329504334135565_172708164208216383_n.jpg (23KB, 600x594px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 600x594px

>>12544755
dude I LOVE brand names!!

Not bad, but sort of memeish.

>>12544775
Why wear cheaper clothing if you aren't poor?

>>12544786
It's not the price point but the utilization of the brand (cdg heart, raf) as a focal point rather than the cut, silhouette, etc...

>>12544755
Why do you need so much branding? That completely defeats the purpose of Scandi minimalism.

>>12544796
Nothing wrong with the quality of any of the. You only focus on it because you're poor and it's a chart not a fit pic

>>12544801
lol aight anon back to r/streetwear please

Amazing...

>>12544796
Raf Stans are made from higher quality material than normal Stand.

One CDG cardigan.

Your idea of too much branding is a small heart and an R.

>>12546131
What's the shirt with that little cute face on it?

>>12547526
acne tshirt

>>12544755
Would slap you in the face on sight

>>12544786
Kek, that's a poor-fuck-pretending-to-be-rich outfit. Every single piece that you used is the entry level of the brand. CDG Play is CDG's low quality hypebeast bait label, Rafdidas are nothing but fucking perforated stan smithes made for people who cannot afford actual Raf, and your tee is the cheapest kind of shit you can find at acne. The cheap kind of shit you could find at COS too, but hey if it costs 4 times more it must be better amirite ?

Also those are litteral faggot cigarets.

>>12546131
>Raf Stans are made from higher quality material than normal Stand.
prove it

>>12547589
It's a stiffer leather that will age better, same leather Adidas uses for their "premium leather shoes". I can't really prove it, this is the internet. You'd know if you hold both.

I mean, they're still shit shoes. The R is ugly and they're still Stan Smiths. I'll stick to my CPs.

But yeah, they're made from higher quality leather.

OP's grid is literally bait anyways.