Do i really need shoe trees for my dress boots?

i'd recommend it, but if you have trash shoes anyway why bother

>>12527800
I said dress boots not shoes

>>12527807
i'd recommend it, but if you have trash boots anyway why bother, cunt.

>>12527807
you just got roasted my dude

>>12527791
>dress boots
What the hell are dress boots supposed to be ?

If they're cheap, no, if they're expensive, yes.

>>12527956
nice boots, stuff you usually wouldnt be working in

File: yk.jpg (369KB, 1000x666px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 1000x666px

>>12527956

File: j-fitzpatrick-footwear-collection-16-march-2017-2099_1024x1024.jpg (98KB, 1024x766px) Image search: [Google]

98KB, 1024x766px

>>12527961
Balmoral boots are my fetish.

File: vs.jpg (54KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x450px

>>12527966

>>12527791
Yeah, use them for any expensive shoes you own.

>>12527791

Why the fuck wouldn't you?

Maybe not, but there's absolutely no downside

Anything "dress" requires shoe trees IMHO. At least, if you want them to look fresh for a long time.

>>12527791
Shoe trees are a necessity for leather shoes unless you want them to develop deep creases.

File: orig.jpg (757KB, 950x674px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 950x674px

>>12527978

>>12527791
I'd recommend cedar shoe trees for most leather footwear. It increases the longevity of it (assuming you have a rotation of footwear), especially patent leathers.

>>12527791

yes, absolutely. trees help pull moisture and bacteria from your feet into the wood, where that shit dessicates and dies. keeps your boots not smelling like shit, and helps the leather hold its shape for longer

>>12527810
underrated post

File: vss.jpg (50KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 600x450px

>>12528767