100% cotton clothing

>>12476593
there's nothing wrong with polyester if you're buying something that's decent quality. it's how it's used/made, not simply what it's made of

>>12476609
I am literally allergic to polyester, unfortunately.

>>12476609
also, polyester doesn't decay. Everytime you wash it, microscopic poly fibers get into the water and pollute ground water and back into our tap water, as well as bodies of water (rivers, seas, oceans) and end up in sea food, and back in us people.
We're literally eating plastic from our own clothes.

>>12476658
good point. not to mention the only advantage polyester clothing has over cotton is sweat-wicking. yet most athletes go shirtless anyways.

If obese people were eradicated everybody woul go back to wearing cotton (polyester is often used because its more flattering on fat people than cotton)

>>12476619
Direct polyester allergies aren't a thing; it might be an allergy to some of the chemical treatments used in making them. Have you tried different brands and blends?

>>12476666
There are plenty of sports where athletes don't just go shirtless. Also, what about underclothes and pants or shorts? Socks?

>>12476670
a jockstrap is usually enough although sometimes athletes WILL use polyester compression shorts because it helps the muscles contract.

most lifters runner and cylists though theres no disadvantage to going shirtless or commando
>>12476667
> Direct polyester allergies aren't a thing
I don't know the specifics but there are lots of different allergies towards synthetic fabrics and plastics. Myself, my skin is unfortunately fucked genetically and polyester basically acts like a lot of small knives that irritate my skin (eczema).

Get supima cottona and dont buy shirts which cost less than 100$

>>12476724
that is an awful idea

>>12476724
redpill me on supima cotton