Will /fa/ be copping these tomorrow? Also sneaker thread
thoughts on Chuck Taylors 2
which ones guys?
>>12412173
Running shoes aren't sneakers.
And styrofoam garbage aren't shoes. Keep it in your containment general.
>>12410508
I know absolutely nothing about trainers but i've been thinking of getting a pair
I seen pic related and w2c but they're pretty much impossible to get in the UK. They're sold out fucking everywhere.
Anything that looks similar?
hey so i saw some dude wearing these nike sneakers, they kinda looked vintage and resembled the mars yard shoes except they had blue accents and they were white and cream, anyone know what they might be??
didnt have time to snap a picture
>>12412173
ID ID ID ID ID
ID
ID
ID
ID
>>12412220
They are.
>>12412743
>mars yard shoes
maybe internationalist or air pegasus?
>>12412783
seriously I'm dying over here
I need help. I recently got a decent looking pair of white sneakers from a relative. They look good enough for me to use them, but there's one problem: they have pic related logo stamped on the outside face of the shoe and it is relatively notorious. Should I still use them?
>>12413144
kinda like this. The shoe itself is good, but there's that stupid logo, although in the ones I got the logo is much smaller than in pic related
>>12413144
why? is diesel hated on 4chan?
>>12412177
personally like the silhouette on these more
ID?
>>12413147
its probably still pretty bad. see if you can sand off the logo, its probably printed on
>>12413165
i dont know about hated, its actually not nearly as popular a brand as it used to be and the backlash also died down. it was and is objectively eurotrashwear though, like g-star or *shudder* energie
>>12413298
ust realised theyre exactly the same
Any of you guys know if the lite versions of Vans shoes are worth it?
>>12413147
Logos are shit, logos that include brand name are shitter, logos that include brand name - twice - and the fucking slogan as well are cringe m8.
Don't be a billboard.