i am done with skinny jeans. what are some good sweat pants / track pants / looser fit cargo pants i can get for not too crazy prices?
also if you have any /baggy/ inspo, post it
>>12281196
The Salvation Army i recon
>>12281196
what's a not crazy price for you anon?
>>12281217
depends on the quality, but i'm not looking to cop some $300 rick pods or anything
>>12281223
i'm mostly curious about hearing experience with cheaper brands, how they fit based on weight and height, quality, materials etc
jeans are easy because you have waist x height, but sweatpants / track pants etc usually just come in S M L XL.
>>12281223
are these loose enough? too much of a taper?
>>12281241
definitely leaning on the side of less taper. that's a little too much for me.
Wall Street Journal just covered how baggy pants are making a comeback
https://www.wsj.com/articles/comfort-alert-wide-trousers-are-on-the-loose-again-1487874526
>>12281199
>I could easily make 10 of these shirts with my dads Northwestern sweatshirts from 87
hot damn I'm seeing $$$$
>>12281241
i personally think those look awesome. not "loosewave" but still awesome.
>>12281388
holy shit what a shitty fit. what else do you expect from uniqlo shitfits
>>12281422
this is not uniqlo cunt
>>12281388
your book shelf lackin
shoes are nice
pants are ok but not on him/you
shirt is a pass imo
idk about yall but undershirts can get fucked
>>12281388
oh god. whats this style called
>>12281448
hhhhhhhh
fuck everything about that boxy ass shirt and fit.
>>12281487
U G L Y
G
L
Y
>/fa/ jumping trends again
Why do it faggots? You know it's gonna swing back around in like 5 years. Just stick with slims instead of skinnies or shit that balloons out.
>>12281505
got em
>>12281454
>pants are ok
>>12281523
yeah guys
just wear the same thing until you die
>>12281388
literal shite
learn to silhouette and proportion
trust someone like you to fall for the uniqlo meme
>>12281487
The Kevin Smith