Which pre-modern "core" was the most /fa/?
>>12264042
16th century mongoliancore desu senpai
no bamboozle
Cossacks
edo japan obviously
>condensing thousands of years of thousands of peoples' fashion into a "core" blanket term
why don't you go read a fuckin' book
victorian
sup
Jesus
>>12264823
"damn jesus you got some nxtlvl layering goin on here w2c"
>>12264042
I dislike the prima porta statue t b h f a m
>>12264615
Seconded
>>12264724
victorian period was part of the modern era
>>12264820
so was elizibeth i's reign
>>12264042
medieval florentine poet core
Why does all clothing pre 1950s look so much better than clothing now?
>>12266014
Industrialisation and automation of everything
More mass production, less made to measure and individual preferences
More synthetic fibers to cut costs
Plus through industrialisation of idolism (pop culture) and the general opinion that everyone should dress and do as one wishes a practice of dressing up has taken hold of the people
Plus advertisements are much more refined today and people will buy any piece of plastic shit as long as it's made by a certain corporation, worn by certain people or presented to them in the right cultural context, which of course entrepreneurs know and exploit
>>12264042
>Viking core
here's an exact replica of the early medieval Scandinavian costume
>>12264898
KEEEEEEEEEEEEK
and damn, those asians were fa as hell
how can one even compete
>>12264056
>>>/reddit/
>>12266118
What time frame is this from?
I doubt how strong the red would be, dyes probably weren't that good and quite expensive.
It looks like something the rich would wear.
>>12266126
I hate the hat but everything else is fucking sweet.
>>12265965
This is as good as it gets, Romans and Greeks knew what they were doing.
Regency era
>>12266281
yes
>>12266260
>I doubt how strong the red would be, dyes probably weren't that good and quite expensive.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/uu-vdn022508.php
>>12266347
Thanks for the article, it was a good read.
I did a little bit of research about this and people are bickering about the clasps and the trimmings so I guess we're not 100% sure.
>They combined oriental features with Nordic styles. Their clothing was designed to be shown off indoors around the fire
I know vikings were good traders so does this mean when they traded with Asia they where influenced by their silk clothing's?
Sallet Core
>>12264695
imagine the comfort of just wearing robes all the time, and when you wanna fuck your qt azn housewife you two just instantly remove them with such grace
>>12267105
Clearly you have never worn their robes, senpai.
>>12267185
I think Greek robes are the way to go, less bulky.
Byzies
>>12267096
>walking through the winter wilderness wearing steel
wew
>>12266454
>does this mean when they traded with Asia they where influenced by their silk clothing's?
perhaps, why not
I doubt the usefulness of silk in a cold climate though
>>12266014
because they had shittier cameras
>>12266281
>pre-modern
>>12267533
Modern is anything after WW2
>>12267538
>Early modern Europe is the period of European history between the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, roughly the late 15th century to the late 18th century.
t. wikipedia
Pre-modern is anything before that.
>>12267543
fuck you my definition makes way more sense
>>12267257
You realize they wore clothing under armor?
>>12268211
talk about skinny pants, look at those leggins. They definitely were avant-garde
>>12268211
try wearing steel plates with clothing in winter, genius
>>12268383
You wear a thick layer of clothing under the armor, so it doesn't touch your skin. Steel itself doesn't create lower than air temperatures, it just transfers it.
>>12264823
>>12267211
When are we going to bring back robes? So simple, comfy, and clean looking. Also >>12264724 Victorian era was /fa/ as fuck.