what does /fa/ think of COS? i know urofegs have had them for

i would say wait for stuff to go on sale. i have a tshirt and a sweater, the tshirt is great quality for the price. the sweater is good but not $90 good IMO

>>12186649
ill have to check it out. their lookbooks seemed pretty okay. do the clothes fit as advertised? i'm kinda looking for a highwaist paperbag pant and nothing else ive tried from other stores really fits how i want.

>>12186645
okay on sale.

-uroflag with a cos nearby

>>12186664
the stuff i have is TTS unless the site indicates otherwise

6ft1, large tees rest about at the waist without much spare room

the shirts, jeans and trousers are usually worth retail price imo, with the rest it depends. the leather good are shit mostly.

ugly and cheap
as if a first year design student made all of it

edgy tryhard futuristic waiter cringe for men, ok for women

>>12187043
>>12187794
How was your 7 hour sleep anon? Expected to get some (you)'d overnight?

Don't worry here's one since it was pretty sad you tried this hard

Only have the t-shirts and they are good for the price. Fits good and are really soft.

File: Screen Shot 2017-01-28 at 18.26.17.png (120KB, 1080x578px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1080x578px

>>12187955
cos fan detected

>>12187794
This. COS is only good for women. Men's pieces are poor quality and mostly look awful.

i have a pair of 'loose fit' (theyre really more like a straight/slim fit) wool pants, theyre aright, at full price though you have a lot of other options

>>12186645
Hm/zara tier trash, copieng designer clothing.

I like their trousers slim cotton trousers.

That's about it.

>>12190893
really isnt at all...
why comment when youve obviously never bought it